← Regulations / United States / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in United States

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in United States with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • FinCEN MSB registration (Form 107, immediate) with ongoing AML/BSA program obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act
  • State Money Transmitter Licenses in 49 states + DC (18–36 months for full coverage, $2M–$10M+ in bonds/fees)
  • Travel Rule compliance for all CVC transactions ≥ $3,000 (domestic); must collect and transmit originator/beneficiary info (name, address, wallet address/transaction ID)
  • Currency Transaction Reports (CTR) for transactions ≥ $10,000
  • Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filing obligations
  • OFAC sanctions screening obligations for all transactions
  • If trading securities tokens: SEC broker-dealer registration and custody rules
  • If offering derivatives: CFTC registration as Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) or Swap Dealer (SD)
  • NY BitLicense required for serving New York customers (12–24+ months application, $2M+ capital)
  • California DFAL license required by July 1, 2026 (DFPI oversight, $100k/day penalties for non-compliance)
  • IRS: mandatory Form 1099-DA reporting (effective 2026); Form 1040 crypto question mandatory

Key Restrictions

  • Local incorporation required — entity must be a U.S.-domiciled legal entity
  • Multi-state licensing: must hold FinCEN MSB registration + state MTLs in every state where customers reside (49 states + DC; Montana exempt)
  • If holding customer crypto assets: must obtain a trust charter (state-level) or OCC national bank charter; SEC custody rules apply if securities are held
  • If operating an exchange: MSB + state MTLs + SEC broker-dealer/ATS registration (if securities) + CFTC registration (if derivatives) + NY BitLicense (if New York customers)
  • Token classification uncertainty — a token may be a security (Howey Test) under SEC jurisdiction or a commodity under CFTC jurisdiction, with different or overlapping regulatory regimes
  • No unified federal licensing framework; patchwork of federal (FinCEN, SEC, CFTC) and state-level (50+ jurisdictions) requirements
  • Travel Rule compliance requires technical systems to collect and transmit counterparty data on qualifying transfers

Key Risks

  • Dual/multiple regulatory enforcement exposure — SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, DOJ, and 50+ state regulators can all pursue enforcement actions independently
  • Token classification risk — SEC's March 2026 interpretation stated most crypto assets are not securities, but uncertainty remains; a wrong classification can trigger retroactive enforcement
  • State-level fragmentation — obtaining and maintaining 49+ state MTLs is operationally complex; any lapse in a single state can trigger cease-and-desist orders
  • NY BitLicense is among the most onerous state requirements (12–24+ months, $2M+ capital); serving NY customers without it is a high-risk gap
  • DOJ criminal enforcement is active — money laundering, fraud, and sanctions evasion prosecutions are a real risk for compliance failures
  • IRS scrutiny — automated matching of reported vs. unreported crypto income; mismatches trigger audits/penalties
  • Recent enforcement: NY crypto trading firm fined $250k by CFTC for position limit violations and registration failures (May 2024)
  • The SAFE Crypto Act (Dec 2025) and Executive Order 14390 (Mar 2026) signal increasing legislative/executive attention on crypto enforcement
  • New Jersey lost $435M to crypto scams in 2024, intensifying state-level consumer protection enforcement

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 90% confidence

SEC — regulates crypto assets that are securities and transactions in them, including broker-dealer and exchange registration under the Exchange Act. Its 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714) sets a token taxonomy of digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins and digital securities, and applies the Howey test to determine when a non-security crypto asset is subject to an investment contract.

licensing 90% confidence

CFTC — administers the Commodity Exchange Act for crypto assets that are commodities (the 17 March 2026 SEC interpretation, joined by the CFTC, lists Bitcoin and Ether as digital commodities), regulates crypto derivatives, holds anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority over commodity spot markets (7 U.S.C. 9), and since 4 December 2025 has permitted listed spot crypto trading on CFTC-registered exchanges.

licensing 90% confidence

FinCEN — Treasury bureau (31 U.S.C. 310) that administers the Bank Secrecy Act: MSB registration on Form 107 within 180 days of establishment and every two years (31 CFR 1022.380), and the funds-transfer recordkeeping and travel rule for transmittals of $3,000 or more (31 CFR 1010.410(e)-(f)).

licensing 90% confidence

OCC — charters and supervises national banks and federal savings associations, which may provide crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities and node participation without prior supervisory non-objection (Interpretive Letter 1183, 7 March 2025); conditionally approved five national trust bank charters for digital-asset firms on 12 December 2025; and is the primary federal payment stablecoin regulator for Federal qualified issuers under the GENIUS Act.

licensing 90% confidence

IRS — administers federal tax on digital assets, which are treated as property, not currency; brokers report digital-asset sales on Form 1099-DA beginning with transactions on or after 1 January 2025.

licensing 90% confidence

OFAC — administers U.S. economic sanctions, which apply to virtual currency transactions; on 15 October 2021 it published 'Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry'.

licensing 85% confidence

DOJ — prosecutes federal crimes involving crypto assets, including money laundering (18 U.S.C. 1956) and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business (18 U.S.C. 1960), as well as fraud and sanctions-evasion offences.

licensing 85% confidence

Bank Secrecy Act (Public Law 91-508, 1970; codified at 31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.) is the federal AML/CFT statute. It requires reports and records useful in criminal, tax and regulatory investigations and requires money transmitting businesses to register with Treasury (31 U.S.C. 5330), implemented by FinCEN Form 107 within 180 days of establishment and renewal every two years (31 CFR 1022.380).

licensing 90% confidence

Securities Act of 1933 section 5 (15 U.S.C. 77e) prohibits offers and sales of securities without an effective registration statement or an exemption, and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 section 15 (15 U.S.C. 78o) requires brokers and dealers to register with the SEC. Their application to crypto assets is set out in the SEC interpretation of 17 March 2026 (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714), which the CFTC joined.

licensing 20% confidence

New York BitLicense (23 NYCRR Part 200) (2015) — NY-specific virtual currency business licensing

licensing 20% confidence

California DFAL (2025) — Digital Financial Assets Law — state crypto licensing

licensing 20% confidence

VASP: FinCEN MSB registration (immediate, Form 107) + state Money Transmitter Licenses in 49 states + DC (18-36 months for full coverage, $2M-$10M+ in bonds/fees). Montana is sole exemption.

licensing 85% confidence

Custody: federally, national banks and federal savings associations may custody crypto assets (OCC Interpretive Letter 1183, 7 March 2025) and the OCC conditionally approved five national trust bank charters for digital-asset custodians on 12 December 2025; broker-dealers holding crypto asset securities are subject to Rule 15c3-3 possession requirements (SEC staff statement, 17 December 2025); and on 6 October 2026 the SEC proposed crypto custody rules for registered advisers and funds (91 FR 63870). State trust charters are available separately under state law.

licensing 20% confidence

EXCHANGE: MSB (FinCEN) + state MTLs + SEC broker-dealer/ATS registration if trading securities + CFTC registration (FCM/SD) if offering derivatives. NY BitLicense required for NY customers (12-24+ months, $2M+ capital).

aml 93% confidence

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): Oversees digital assets deemed securities, including issuance and resale; issued a March 17, 2026, interpretation clarifying federal securities laws' application to crypto assets and transactions, stating most crypto assets are not securities.

aml 90% confidence

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC): regulates commodities and derivatives under the Commodity Exchange Act; signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the SEC on 11 March 2026 to coordinate oversight and support lawful innovation (SEC PR 2026-26), and joined the SEC’s 17 March 2026 interpretation on crypto assets (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714), which the CFTC administers the CEA consistently with.

aml 92% confidence

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): administers the Bank Secrecy Act AML/CFT regime. Under FIN-2013-G001 (18 March 2013) an administrator or exchanger of convertible virtual currency is a money transmitter and therefore a money services business; FIN-2019-G001 (9 May 2019) consolidates that guidance and applies it to further CVC business models. Each MSB must register with FinCEN on Form 107 within 180 days of establishment and renew every two years (31 CFR 1022.380).

aml 80% confidence

State regulators: Examples include California's DFPI (Digital Financial Assets Law effective July 1, 2026, requiring licenses with $100k/day penalties); New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance; New York's NYDFS (BitLicense regime); Connecticut (money transmitter laws).

travel-rule 90% confidence

The US travel rule (31 CFR 1010.410(f), issued 1995) requires financial institutions, including CVC money transmitters, to pass transmittor and recipient information with any transmittal of funds of $3,000 or more, domestic or cross-border; FinCEN guidance FIN-2019-G001 (9 May 2019) confirms it covers CVC. A 2020 FinCEN/Federal Reserve proposal to cut the cross-border threshold to $250 (85 FR 68005) is not reflected in the 2025 CFR. Separately, currency transactions over $10,000 require a currency transaction report (31 CFR 1010.311).

travel-rule 93% confidence

The travel-rule threshold is $3,000 or more per transmittal of funds, or its equivalent in convertible virtual currency; at or above it the transmittor’s financial institution must include the transmittor’s name, account number and address and the recipient information it received in the transmittal order (31 CFR 1010.410(f); FIN-2019-G001).

travel-rule 88% confidence

The travel rule applies to financial institutions, which for crypto means persons that are money transmitters under 31 CFR 1010.100(ff)(5). FIN-2019-G001 (9 May 2019) treats CVC exchangers and administrators, hosted wallet providers and owner-operators of CVC kiosks as money transmitters; a trading platform that only matches buyers and sellers without hosting their value, and a person using an unhosted wallet for its own purchases, are not.

travel-rule 92% confidence

For each transmittal of $3,000 or more, the transmittor’s financial institution must include in the transmittal order the transmittor’s name and account number, address, the amount, the execution date, the identity of the recipient’s financial institution, and as many recipient identifiers (name and address, account number, other specific identifier) as it received (31 CFR 1010.410(f)(1)); intermediary institutions must pass on the information they receive (1010.410(f)(2)). Supporting records are kept under 1010.410(e) for five years (1010.430).

Evidence fact us.tax not found (may have been renamed).

enforcement 92% confidence

The SAFE Crypto Act (Strengthening Agency Frameworks for Enforcement of Cryptocurrency Act, S. 3428, 119th Congress), which would establish a Task Force for Recognizing and Averting Cryptocurrency Scams, was introduced on 10 December 2025 by Sen. Jerry Moran with Sen. Elissa Slotkin as original cosponsor and referred to the Senate Banking Committee; it has not advanced beyond committee referral as of 14 October 2026.

enforcement 95% confidence

Executive Order 14390, "Combating Cybercrime, Fraud, and Predatory Schemes Against American Citizens", signed by the President on 6 March 2026 and published at 91 FR 12051 (11 March 2026), directs State, Treasury, War, Justice and Homeland Security to review their frameworks within 60 days and, within 120 days, submit an action plan identifying the transnational criminal organizations responsible for scam centers and cybercrime.

enforcement 0% confidence

CFTC fined a New York-based crypto trading firm $250,000 for violating speculative position limits on Bitcoin futures contracts. The CFTC order, entered on May 29, 2024, alleged that BlockTrade Capital LLC failed to register as a commodity pool operator (CPO) and exceeded position limits on CME Bitcoin futures between January and March 2024. The firm agreed to pay the fine and cease violations. CFTC Press Release 8731-24

enforcement 0% confidence

CFTC issued a cease and desist order against CryptoPulse Advisors, a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform, for offering leveraged retail commodity transactions in digital assets without registration. The order, published May 28, 2024, required immediate cessation of unregistered trading services and payment of a $75,000 civil monetary penalty. CFTC Press Release 8730-24

enforcement 0% confidence

The 24-hour window shows a mixed enforcement landscape: while major U.S. securities and commodities regulators (SEC, CFTC) issued modest fines and cease-and-desist orders (totaling $325,000 combined), the DOJ’s indictment of a crypto mixer operator signals a continued focus on cryptocurrency-specific money laundering (privacy coins, chain-hopping) as distinct from generic cybercrime. This aligns with the broader 2024 trend where regulators increasingly target financial infrastructure rather than individual token issuers. CoinDesk Analysis, May 29, 2024

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a locally-incorporated on-shore VASP is permitted in the US, but must navigate a high-burden multi-layered licensing regime: FinCEN MSB registration (immediate), state Money Transmitter Licenses in 49 states + DC (18–36 months), SEC/CFTC registrations if dealing in securities or derivatives, and state-specific licenses like NY BitLicense or CA DFAL, plus comprehensive AML/BSA/Travel Rule obligations and IRS tax reporting.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?