← Regulations / Poland / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Poland

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Poland with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with GIIF (Minister of Finance) under the Polish AML Act before commencing operations (pl.licensing.current-registration-poland-operates-a, pl.aml.regulatory-body-the-register-is)
  • Appoint a designated AML/Compliance Officer (pl.licensing.aml-officer-appoint-a-designated)
  • Develop and implement internal AML/CTF procedures including a business-specific risk assessment (pl.licensing.internal-amlctf-procedures-develop-and)
  • Perform Customer Due Diligence (CDD) including identity verification of clients and beneficial owners, sanctions screening (pl.licensing.customer-due-diligence-cdd-implement)
  • Conduct ongoing transaction monitoring and monitoring of client relationships (pl.licensing.ongoing-monitoring-conduct-ongoing-monitoring, pl.licensing.transaction-monitoring-implement-systems-to)
  • Report suspicious transactions and activities to GIIF (pl.licensing.reporting-report-suspicious-transactions-and)
  • Maintain records of client identification data and transactions for at least 5 years (pl.licensing.record-keeping-maintain-records-of-client)
  • Provide regular AML/CTF training for relevant employees (pl.licensing.training-provide-regular-amlctf-training)
  • Proof of knowledge and experience in virtual currencies required for registration (pl.aml.proof-of-knowledge-and-experience)
  • Under MiCA (from 30 Dec 2024): authorization from KNF required, with minimum capital of €50k-€150k, segregation of client assets, robust IT/security protocols, and business continuity planning (pl.aml.requirement-under-mica-entities-wishing, pl.aml.conditions-for-authorization-casps-will, pl.aml.requirement-mica-explicitly-mandates-the)

Key Restrictions

  • Must be a Polish legal entity (e.g., Sp. z o.o. or S.A.) (pl.licensing.the-applicant-must-be-a)
  • At least one management board member must reside in Poland or hold Polish citizenship (pl.licensing.at-least-one-individual-from)
  • Management board members and beneficial owners must meet fit-and-proper criteria with no criminal record for intentional financial crimes (pl.licensing.fit-proper-criteria-managementowners, pl.licensing.have-no-criminal-record-for)
  • No specific minimum capital requirements under current AML Act, but MiCA (Dec 2024) will impose capital of €50k–€150k depending on service type (pl.licensing.under-the-current-polish-aml, pl.licensing.future-mica-impact-mica-will)
  • Client asset segregation not currently mandated explicitly by Polish AML Act, but MiCA will require segregation of client crypto-assets and funds (pl.aml.current-status-the-current-polish, pl.aml.requirement-mica-explicitly-mandates-the)

Key Risks

  • Transitional risk: Current AML registration regime is relatively light (no capital requirements), but MiCA will introduce significantly stricter prudential requirements from Dec 2024, creating regulatory uncertainty for operators mid-application
  • Regulatory body changes from GIIF/Ministry of Finance (current) to KNF (Polish Financial Supervision Authority under MiCA) — operators may need to re-license or obtain top-up authorization
  • Current Polish AML Act does not explicitly mandate client asset segregation for custodians — potentially exposing operators to legal ambiguity until MiCA applies
  • KNF as MiCA regulator is untested in crypto supervision — application timelines and standards are uncertain
  • Crypto-to-crypto exchanges are taxable events (19% flat tax), creating accounting complexity and tax reporting burdens (pl.tax.exchanging-one-virtual-currency-for, pl.tax.a-flat-rate-of-19)

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 95% confidence

Poland's pre-MiCA regime is the register of virtual-currency activity under Arts 129m–129z of the AML Act of 1 March 2018, kept for the Minister of Finance by the Director of IAS Katowice (not GIIF); it has accepted no new entries since 30 December 2024, and since 1 July 2026 an entry confers no right to provide crypto-asset services.

licensing 90% confidence

Virtual-currency activity under the AML Act of 1 March 2018 may be carried on by a natural person, a legal person or an organisational unit without legal personality (Art 129n(1)); a Polish company is not required, although the register has accepted no new entries since 30 December 2024.

licensing 0% confidence

At least one individual from the management board of the Polish legal entity must have their residence in Poland or possess a Polish citizenship.

Evidence fact pl.licensing.fit-proper-criteria-managementowners not found (may have been renamed).

licensing 90% confidence

The AML Act (Art 129n) requires that a natural person running virtual-currency activity, or the partners, representatives and management of a legal entity, its managers and beneficial owner, have no final conviction for listed intentional offences — including against economic trading, money and securities, property, documents, for profit — or an intentional fiscal offence.

licensing 90% confidence

The AML Act of 1 March 2018 sets no minimum capital requirement for entry in the virtual-currency register: Arts 129n–129o require only a clean criminal record and knowledge or experience; the register has accepted no new entries since 30 December 2024.

licensing 80% confidence

Future MiCA Impact: MiCA will introduce capital requirements for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), ranging from €50,000 to €150,000 depending on the type of services provided.

licensing 80% confidence

Internal AML/CTF Procedures: Develop and implement robust internal anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing procedures, including a risk assessment specific to the business and its clients.

licensing 80% confidence

AML Officer: Appoint a designated individual responsible for AML/CTF compliance (AML Officer or Compliance Officer).

licensing 80% confidence

Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Implement procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of clients, including beneficial owners, and understanding the purpose and nature of business relationships. This involves collecting identity documents, verifying data, and screening against sanctions lists.

licensing 80% confidence

Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct ongoing monitoring of client relationships and transactions to detect suspicious activities.

licensing 80% confidence

Transaction Monitoring: Implement systems to monitor transactions for unusual patterns or thresholds.

licensing 80% confidence

Reporting: Report suspicious transactions and activities to GIIF.

licensing 80% confidence

Record-keeping: Maintain records of client identification data and transactions for at least 5 years.

licensing 80% confidence

Training: Provide regular AML/CTF training for relevant employees.

aml 92% confidence

The competent organ for Poland's register of virtual-currency activity is the minister responsible for public finance (AML Act Art 129p), who by ordinance of 25 October 2021 (Dz.U. 2021 poz. 1964) designated the Director of the Revenue Administration Regional Office (IAS) in Katowice to keep the register.

aml 92% confidence

Under Art 129o of Poland's AML Act (consolidated Dz.U. 2025 poz. 644), natural persons carrying on virtual-currency activity must have knowledge or experience in it, deemed met by completing a training course on its legal or practical aspects or by at least one year of documented work in that activity.

aml 80% confidence

Poland's AML Act of 1 March 2018 (consolidated Dz.U. 2025 poz. 644) contains no client-asset segregation rule for virtual-currency custodians; segregation is required of crypto-asset service providers by MiCA Art 75(7), applicable since 30 December 2024, but no CASP is authorised in Poland (ESMA interim register, last update 31 Aug 2026), so the rule reaches Polish clients only through CASPs authorised in other member states.

aml 80% confidence

Requirement: Under MiCA, entities wishing to provide custody and administration of crypto-assets will need to obtain an authorization from their competent national authority (likely the Polish Financial Supervision Authority – KNF). This authorization will be passportable across the EU.

aml 80% confidence

Conditions for Authorization: CASPs will need to meet stringent organizational, operational, and prudential requirements, including:

aml 80% confidence

Requirement: MiCA explicitly mandates the segregation of client crypto-assets and funds. Article 67 specifies that CASPs providing custody services must:

tax 90% confidence

Exchanging one virtual currency for another is not a taxable event in Poland: Art 17(1f) of the PIT Act defines a paid disposal as an exchange for legal tender, goods, services or property rights other than virtual currency, and expenses linked to a crypto-to-crypto exchange are not deductible costs (Art 23(1) pkt 38d).

tax 90% confidence

Income of Polish individuals from the paid disposal of virtual currency is taxed at a flat 19% (PIT Act Art 30b(1a)); the income is the difference between that year's disposal revenue and the costs determined under Art 22(14)–(16) (Art 30b(1b)).

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — on-shore VASPs are permitted in Poland under the current AML Act registration regime (GIIF/Ministry of Finance), with a light-touch AML-focused entry but no capital requirement; however, from 30 December 2024, MiCA will impose full authorization through KNF with capital requirements (€50k–€150k) and mandatory client asset segregation, creating a transitional licensing burden.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?