On-shore VASP in India
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in India with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and low licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Low
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- VDA Service Provider registration with FIU-IND under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (amended March 7, 2023) — mandatory for all on-shore VASPs
- Implement transaction monitoring systems (risk-based, real-time, AI-powered) to flag suspicious activities like large transfers, structuring, or high-risk patterns
- Deploy blockchain analytics tools (e.g., SaaS models analyzing wallets, histories, and typologies like chain-hopping or mixers) integrated with transaction monitoring
- Implement Travel Rule solutions to share originator/beneficiary details (name, account, address) for virtual asset transfers via secure channels, with screening, recordkeeping, and rejection of incomplete data
- Continuous screening of wallets, addresses, and counterparties against sanctions lists (e.g., OFAC SDN List, UN Consolidated List) and apply 50% ownership blocking rule
- Immediately freeze sanctioned cryptoassets and report to authorities
- Report suspicious transactions (SARs) to FIU-IND — no specific de minimis threshold identified for India; requirements appear to apply broadly to all VDA transactions
- Adhere to FIU-IND AML & CFT Guidelines for VDA Service Providers (January 8, 2026 update)
- No minimum capital requirement specified for FIU-IND registration
Key Restrictions
- Must be locally incorporated in India and registered with FIU-IND as a VDA Service Provider
- No specific custody framework, stablecoin framework, DeFi framework, or token issuance framework exists — activities beyond simple exchange/custody lack legal clarity
- RBI historically hostile to private crypto (attempted outright ban in 2018, reversed by Supreme Court in 2020); stablecoin/payment-related VASP activities face heightened regulatory risk
- 30% flat tax on all VDA income (Section 115BBH); no loss offset allowed; 1% TDS on transactions above INR 50,000 (Section 194S) — massively depresses trading economics
- Gifts of VDA from non-relatives exceeding INR 50,000 taxable at 30%
- SEBI may regulate tokens classified as securities — dual regulatory risk between SEBI and FIU-IND/RBI
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity — no comprehensive crypto legislation despite being 'upcoming' since 2021; legal framework relies on PMLA amendments and FIU-IND guidelines only
- RBI hostility to private crypto creates risk of future restrictive regulations or payment/banking access restrictions for VASPs
- Tax regime (30% flat + 1% TDS + no loss offset) severely impacts business viability and domestic trading volumes
- Offshore exchanges blocked in January 2024 for non-compliance set precedent for aggressive enforcement; on-shore VASPs must maintain continuous compliance
- No clear guidance on business classification for crypto traders — CBDT has not clarified when gains are business income (slab rates) vs. VDA income (30% flat)
- PMLA penalties: fines up to 3x contravention value + 3-7 years imprisonment; FEMA violations up to 3x amount
- Travel Rule threshold unclear — no specific de minimis threshold detailed for India; may apply to all VDA transactions
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
FIU-IND registers VDA service providers as reporting entities under the PMLA 2002 (FIU guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023); on 28 Dec 2023 it issued section 13 show-cause notices to nine offshore VDA service providers and asked MeitY to block their URLs.
SEBI does not license crypto exchanges or classify crypto tokens; the Ministry of Finance states that crypto products and NFTs are unregulated in India, and VDA service providers register with FIU-IND under the PMLA.
The RBI runs the e₹ CBDC, which is being piloted in retail and wholesale segments (RBI FAQ, 1 Oct 2026); its 6 Apr 2018 circular barring regulated entities from dealing in virtual currencies was set aside by the Supreme Court on 4 Mar 2020.
PMLA 2002 s 2(1)(sa)(vi): Ministry of Finance notification F.No. P-12011/12/2022-ES Cell-DOR of 7 Mar 2023 brought five VDA activities under the Act, and VDA service providers must register with FIU-IND as reporting entities (FIU guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023).
Finance Act 2022 inserted s 115BBH (30% tax on income from transferring a virtual digital asset, from AY 2023-24) and s 194S (1% TDS from 1 Jul 2022; none where a specified person pays up to ₹50,000 a year or another payer up to ₹10,000). Section numbers are those of the Income-tax Act 1961; the Income-tax Act 2025 replaced that Act from 1 Apr 2026 and also defines VDAs.
India has no VASP licence: VDA service providers register with FIU-IND as PMLA reporting entities (guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023). PIB reported 31 registered as of 28 Dec 2023 and 50 as of 1 Oct 2025; FIU-IND publishes no register.
India has no custody-specific crypto framework; safekeeping or administration of VDAs, or of instruments enabling control over VDAs, is one of the five activities notified under PMLA s 2(1)(sa)(vi) on 7 Mar 2023, so custodians register with FIU-IND as reporting entities.
VDA exchanges (VDA–fiat and VDA–VDA) must register with FIU-IND under the PMLA; non-registered offshore exchanges received section 13 notices on 28 Dec 2023 (9), 1 Oct 2025 (25) and 9 Sep 2026 (15), with URL-blocking or IT Act s 79(3)(b) takedown action.
FIU-IND guidelines of 10 Mar 2023 (§6.1.3) require VDA service providers to monitor transactions passing through their systems and to maintain transaction monitoring systems that determine the origin of a VDA and monitor its destination.
Blockchain Analytics Tools: Supported indirectly. Sources highlight blockchain monitoring (e.g., SaaS models analyzing wallets, histories, and typologies like chain-hopping or mixers) as essential for VASP compliance, often integrated with transaction monitoring.
FIU-IND guidelines of 10 Mar 2023 (§11.3 "Travel Rule") require VDA service providers, under PMLA Rule 12(1)(a), to include accurate originator and beneficiary information on VDA transfers and to monitor for transfers lacking it; §11.3 states no threshold.
VDA service providers were brought under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act 2002 by Ministry of Finance notification F.No. P-12011/12/2022-ES Cell-DOR of 7 March 2023, which designated five VDA activities under s 2(1)(sa)(vi); FIU-IND's AML & CFT guidelines for these providers took effect on 10 March 2023.
FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 AML & CFT guidelines require VDA service providers to file a suspicious transaction report with FIU-IND irrespective of the transaction amount where there are reasonable grounds to believe the transaction involves proceeds of crime (§7); the travel-rule section (§11.3) sets no monetary threshold.
Five VDA activities carried on for or on behalf of another person make a provider a PMLA reporting entity: VDA-fiat exchange, VDA-VDA exchange, VDA transfer, safekeeping or administration of VDAs, and financial services for an issuer's VDA offer; all must register with FIU-IND, which counted 31 registered providers on 28 December 2023 and 50 on 1 October 2025.
FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 AML & CFT guidelines require VDA service providers to run transaction-monitoring systems that trace the origin and destination of VDAs (§6.1.3), expect blockchain-analytics and sanctions-screening tools in client due diligence (§5.8.5), and apply the travel rule to VDA transfers (§11.3).
The Prevention of Money-laundering Act 2002 was not amended to cover VDAs: the 7 March 2023 notification added VDA activities under s 2(1)(sa)(vi), so VDA service providers are reporting entities under s 2(1)(wa), bound by s 12 record-keeping and reporting duties and subject to FIU-IND penalties under s 13.
FIU-IND issued AML & CFT Guidelines for Reporting Entities Providing Services Related to Virtual Digital Assets on 10 March 2023, effective immediately; FIU-IND lists an updated version dated 8 January 2026 and registration circulars of 4 July 2023, 17 October 2023, 20 January 2025 and 15 September 2025.
Screening obligations: Continuous screening of wallets, addresses, and counterparties against the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List (https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov), plus the 50% Rule (block entities owned ≥50% by SDN-listed persons) (https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/topic/1626). No crypto exceptions; includes sanctioned jurisdictions like Iran, North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Crimea/Donbas (https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information).
Blocking: Immediately freeze sanctioned cryptoassets (e.g., from designated wallets/exchanges like Blender.io or SUEX) and report to OFAC; no trading/transfer allowed without license (https://www.elliptic.co/blockchain-basics/what-are-ofac-crypto-sanctions).
Penalties: Civil fines up to $1M+ per violation (e.g., Binance $3.4B in 2023 for Iran/Russia/Cuba dealings; Bittrex $24M) (https://sanctionslawyers.net/ofac-lawyers/ofac-cryptocurrency-sanctions/); criminal penalties possible. Indian VASPs risk secondary sanctions or PMLA fines up to ₹10 lakh + imprisonment.
Screening obligations: Screen against UN Consolidated List (https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/un-sc-consolidated-list); covers terrorists, proliferators (e.g., North Korea).
Blocking: Freeze assets and prohibit dealings.
Penalties: PMLA fines (up to 3x contravention value) + 3-7 years imprisonment; FEMA violations up to 3x amount.
India applies the travel rule to VDA service providers through §11.3 of FIU-IND's AML & CFT guidelines effective 10 March 2023, which cites PMLA Rule 12(1)(a) and sets no monetary threshold; INR 50,000 is the s 194S TDS limit for specified persons, not a travel-rule threshold.
FIU-IND's travel rule binds both originating and beneficiary VDA service providers, whether or not registered, and for transfers involving an unhosted wallet the compliance duty falls on the provider hosting the other wallet (guidelines of 10 March 2023, §11).
FIU-IND's travel rule for VDA transfers (§11.3 of the 10 March 2023 guidelines) sets no de minimis threshold and applies whether the transfer value is denominated in fiat currency or another VDA; India has not adopted the FATF USD/EUR 1,000 figure.
Under FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 guidelines, VDA service providers must monitor transactions for the origin and destination of VDAs, screen counterparties with blockchain-analytics and sanctions tools, and transmit originator and beneficiary data with each VDA transfer, flagging transfers that lack it.
Evidence fact in.travel-rule.legislation-and-guidance not found (may have been renamed).
The travel rule for VDA service providers rests on the Prevention of Money-laundering Act 2002 and its rules: FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 guidelines ground §11.3 in Rule 12(1)(a) and apply it to providers designated by the 7 March 2023 notification under s 2(1)(sa)(vi).
FIU-IND AML & CFT Guidelines for VDA service providers: Referenced in implementation overview.
FIU-IND lists AML & CFT Guidelines for Reporting Entities Providing Services Related to Virtual Digital Assets updated as on 8 January 2026, revising the guidelines first issued on 10 March 2023 that contain the travel rule at §11.3.
Evidence fact in.tax not found (may have been renamed).
Transfers and trading: Flat 30% on profits.
Mining, staking, and airdrops are generally treated as VDA income at 30%, but the cost basis for mined crypto may not be zero if the taxpayer can substantiate acquisition costs; expenses like electricity remain non-deductible.
From 1 April 2023 (assessment year 2023-24), section 16 of the Finance Act 2022 extended "property" in section 56(2)(x) of the Income-tax Act 1961 to include virtual digital assets, so a VDA received without consideration or for inadequate consideration is taxable in the recipient's hands under that clause. The Income-tax Act 2025 replaces the 1961 Act from 1 April 2026; the 1961 Act section numbers are cited here.
Non-VDA income (e.g., salary in crypto) may fall under slab rates, but VDA-specific rules dominate.
Individuals and businesses: Report VDA income in Schedule VDA of ITR forms (e.g., ITR-2 or ITR-3); include details of transfers, TDS, and gains.
TDS credits (1%) can be claimed; track all transactions as exchanges deduct TDS on sales.
Business classification does alter VDA rates in some cases—if a taxpayer qualifies as a "trader" in crypto (frequent trading), the gains may be classified as business income taxable at slab rates (which could be lower than 30% for certain taxpayers), though the CBDT has not issued clear guidance on this bifurcation.
Section 115BBH of the Income-tax Act 1961, inserted by the Finance Act 2022 with effect from 1 April 2023 (assessment year 2023-24), taxes income from the transfer of a virtual digital asset at 30%, allows no deduction other than cost of acquisition, and bars setting off or carrying forward VDA losses. The Income-tax Act 2025 replaces the 1961 Act from 1 April 2026; the 1961 Act section numbers are cited here.
Section 194S of the Income-tax Act 1961, inserted by the Finance Act 2022 with effect from 1 July 2022, requires 1% TDS on consideration paid to a resident for transferring a virtual digital asset, except where a specified person pays no more than ₹50,000, or any other payer no more than ₹10,000, in a financial year. The Income-tax Act 2025 replaces the 1961 Act from 1 April 2026; the 1961 Act section numbers are cited here.
Income Tax Department: https://incometaxindia.gov.in (search Sections 115BBH, 194S).
CBDT Circulars: https://www.incometax.gov.in/iec/foportal/ (TDS notifications).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — on-shore VASPs may operate in India subject to FIU-IND registration under the PMLA (no minimum capital, 1-3 month process), but face the world's most punitive crypto tax regime (30% flat tax, 1% TDS, no loss offset) and significant regulatory ambiguity from RBI hostility, absence of comprehensive crypto legislation, and unclear frameworks for custody, stablecoins, and token issuance.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?