← Regulations / India / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in India

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in India with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with FIU-IND as a VDA Service Provider (reporting entity) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 (amended March 7, 2023) — mandatory for custodial wallet/SaaS operators that hold keys on behalf of end users
  • Implement transaction monitoring systems as required by FIU-IND AML & CFT Guidelines for VDA Service Providers — risk-based, real-time, AI-powered systems to flag suspicious activities (large transfers, structuring, high-risk patterns)
  • Deploy blockchain analytics tools (e.g., SaaS models analyzing wallets, histories, chain-hopping, mixers) as an essential part of VASP compliance
  • Adopt Travel Rule solutions — share originator/beneficiary details (name, account, address) for virtual asset transfers via secure channels, with screening, recordkeeping, and rejection of incomplete data
  • Screen wallets, addresses, and counterparties against OFAC SDN List (https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov), EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List, and UN Consolidated List; apply 50% ownership rule
  • Freeze sanctioned cryptoassets immediately and report to authorities
  • File Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) to FIU-IND; maintain records as per PMLA
  • Comply with Finance Act 2022 — 30% flat tax on virtual digital assets (Section 115BBH) and 1% TDS on transactions above INR 50,000
  • Penalties for non-compliance: PMLA fines up to 3× contravention value + 3–7 years imprisonment; FEMA violations up to 3× amount; potential OFAC secondary sanctions exposure

Key Restrictions

  • No specific custody/qualified-custodian licensing framework exists — custodial wallet/SaaS operators rely on general FIU-IND VDA SP registration
  • No regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, or token issuance — operators dealing with these face significant legal uncertainty
  • Offshore (non-Indian-incorporated) custodial wallet providers face blocking by the Indian government if not FIU-IND registered — local incorporation and registration are effectively mandatory
  • RBI maintains historically hostile stance toward private crypto (attempted ban in 2018, reversed by Supreme Court in 2020) — payment integration risks remain
  • Securities-classified tokens fall under SEBI jurisdiction — custodians handling tokenized securities may face dual regulation
  • Travel Rule applies to all VDA transfers with no specific threshold mentioned for India — effectively applies to all transactions

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: No comprehensive crypto legislation enacted despite being 'upcoming' since 2021 — operators face shifting regulatory expectations
  • RBI hostility: Central bank opposed to private crypto; risk of further payment/banking restrictions for VASPs
  • Enforcement precedent: 9 offshore exchanges (including Binance, KuCoin) blocked in January 2024 for non-compliance — demonstrates aggressive enforcement posture
  • Tax burden: 30% flat tax on VDA gains + 1% TDS creates compliance overhead and may deter user adoption
  • AML/CTF guidelines post-amendment lack explicit FIU-IND-specific published guidance — operators must infer requirements from FATF standards and global precedent
  • White-label structure risk: Custodial SaaS provider may bear primary AML responsibility even where white-label client performs front-end KYC — unclear allocation of liability under PMLA
  • Secondary sanctions exposure: OFAC/EU/UN screening obligations create cross-jurisdictional enforcement risk

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 92% confidence

FIU-IND registers VDA service providers as reporting entities under the PMLA 2002 (FIU guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023); on 28 Dec 2023 it issued section 13 show-cause notices to nine offshore VDA service providers and asked MeitY to block their URLs.

licensing 75% confidence

SEBI does not license crypto exchanges or classify crypto tokens; the Ministry of Finance states that crypto products and NFTs are unregulated in India, and VDA service providers register with FIU-IND under the PMLA.

licensing 90% confidence

The RBI runs the e₹ CBDC, which is being piloted in retail and wholesale segments (RBI FAQ, 1 Oct 2026); its 6 Apr 2018 circular barring regulated entities from dealing in virtual currencies was set aside by the Supreme Court on 4 Mar 2020.

licensing 90% confidence

PMLA 2002 s 2(1)(sa)(vi): Ministry of Finance notification F.No. P-12011/12/2022-ES Cell-DOR of 7 Mar 2023 brought five VDA activities under the Act, and VDA service providers must register with FIU-IND as reporting entities (FIU guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023).

licensing 90% confidence

Finance Act 2022 inserted s 115BBH (30% tax on income from transferring a virtual digital asset, from AY 2023-24) and s 194S (1% TDS from 1 Jul 2022; none where a specified person pays up to ₹50,000 a year or another payer up to ₹10,000). Section numbers are those of the Income-tax Act 1961; the Income-tax Act 2025 replaced that Act from 1 Apr 2026 and also defines VDAs.

licensing 90% confidence

India has no VASP licence: VDA service providers register with FIU-IND as PMLA reporting entities (guidelines effective 10 Mar 2023). PIB reported 31 registered as of 28 Dec 2023 and 50 as of 1 Oct 2025; FIU-IND publishes no register.

licensing 85% confidence

India has no custody-specific crypto framework; safekeeping or administration of VDAs, or of instruments enabling control over VDAs, is one of the five activities notified under PMLA s 2(1)(sa)(vi) on 7 Mar 2023, so custodians register with FIU-IND as reporting entities.

licensing 90% confidence

VDA exchanges (VDA–fiat and VDA–VDA) must register with FIU-IND under the PMLA; non-registered offshore exchanges received section 13 notices on 28 Dec 2023 (9), 1 Oct 2025 (25) and 9 Sep 2026 (15), with URL-blocking or IT Act s 79(3)(b) takedown action.

licensing 90% confidence

FIU-IND guidelines of 10 Mar 2023 (§6.1.3) require VDA service providers to monitor transactions passing through their systems and to maintain transaction monitoring systems that determine the origin of a VDA and monitor its destination.

licensing 20% confidence

Blockchain Analytics Tools: Supported indirectly. Sources highlight blockchain monitoring (e.g., SaaS models analyzing wallets, histories, and typologies like chain-hopping or mixers) as essential for VASP compliance, often integrated with transaction monitoring.

licensing 90% confidence

FIU-IND guidelines of 10 Mar 2023 (§11.3 "Travel Rule") require VDA service providers, under PMLA Rule 12(1)(a), to include accurate originator and beneficiary information on VDA transfers and to monitor for transfers lacking it; §11.3 states no threshold.

aml 90% confidence

VDA service providers were brought under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act 2002 by Ministry of Finance notification F.No. P-12011/12/2022-ES Cell-DOR of 7 March 2023, which designated five VDA activities under s 2(1)(sa)(vi); FIU-IND's AML & CFT guidelines for these providers took effect on 10 March 2023.

aml 85% confidence

FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 AML & CFT guidelines require VDA service providers to file a suspicious transaction report with FIU-IND irrespective of the transaction amount where there are reasonable grounds to believe the transaction involves proceeds of crime (§7); the travel-rule section (§11.3) sets no monetary threshold.

aml 90% confidence

Five VDA activities carried on for or on behalf of another person make a provider a PMLA reporting entity: VDA-fiat exchange, VDA-VDA exchange, VDA transfer, safekeeping or administration of VDAs, and financial services for an issuer's VDA offer; all must register with FIU-IND, which counted 31 registered providers on 28 December 2023 and 50 on 1 October 2025.

aml 88% confidence

FIU-IND's 10 March 2023 AML & CFT guidelines require VDA service providers to run transaction-monitoring systems that trace the origin and destination of VDAs (§6.1.3), expect blockchain-analytics and sanctions-screening tools in client due diligence (§5.8.5), and apply the travel rule to VDA transfers (§11.3).

aml 88% confidence

The Prevention of Money-laundering Act 2002 was not amended to cover VDAs: the 7 March 2023 notification added VDA activities under s 2(1)(sa)(vi), so VDA service providers are reporting entities under s 2(1)(wa), bound by s 12 record-keeping and reporting duties and subject to FIU-IND penalties under s 13.

aml 85% confidence

FIU-IND issued AML & CFT Guidelines for Reporting Entities Providing Services Related to Virtual Digital Assets on 10 March 2023, effective immediately; FIU-IND lists an updated version dated 8 January 2026 and registration circulars of 4 July 2023, 17 October 2023, 20 January 2025 and 15 September 2025.

aml 20% confidence

Screening obligations: Continuous screening of wallets, addresses, and counterparties against the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List (https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov), plus the 50% Rule (block entities owned ≥50% by SDN-listed persons) (https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/topic/1626). No crypto exceptions; includes sanctioned jurisdictions like Iran, North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Crimea/Donbas (https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information).

aml 20% confidence

Blocking: Immediately freeze sanctioned cryptoassets (e.g., from designated wallets/exchanges like Blender.io or SUEX) and report to OFAC; no trading/transfer allowed without license (https://www.elliptic.co/blockchain-basics/what-are-ofac-crypto-sanctions).

aml 20% confidence

Penalties: Civil fines up to $1M+ per violation (e.g., Binance $3.4B in 2023 for Iran/Russia/Cuba dealings; Bittrex $24M) (https://sanctionslawyers.net/ofac-lawyers/ofac-cryptocurrency-sanctions/); criminal penalties possible. Indian VASPs risk secondary sanctions or PMLA fines up to ₹10 lakh + imprisonment.

aml 20% confidence

Screening obligations: Screen against EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List (https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/consolidated-list-of-persons-groups-and-entities-subject-to-eu-financial-sanctions?locale=en); ≥50% ownership threshold codified in 19th Russia package (Oct 2025), banning crypto exchanges/transactions with targets like Rosneft (https://amlwatcher.com/blog/ofac-ofsi-eu-un-sanctions-screening-guide/). Sectoral bans (e.g., Russian LNG/crypto) apply.

aml 20% confidence

Blocking: Freeze assets of listed persons/entities; report to EU authorities.

aml 20% confidence

Screening obligations: Screen against UN Consolidated List (https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/un-sc-consolidated-list); covers terrorists, proliferators (e.g., North Korea).

aml 20% confidence

Blocking: Freeze assets and prohibit dealings.

aml 0% confidence

Penalties: PMLA fines (up to 3x contravention value) + 3-7 years imprisonment; FEMA violations up to 3x amount.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS operators are permitted in India through FIU-IND VDA SP registration (no specific custody framework), but must maintain local incorporation, implement transaction monitoring, blockchain analytics, and Travel Rule solutions, and comply with PMLA AML obligations and Finance Act 2022 taxation, against a backdrop of regulatory ambiguity and historically hostile central bank posture.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?