Custodial wallet / SaaS in Switzerland
Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).
Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Switzerland with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- KYC mandatory for transactions exceeding CHF 1,000 per month; prove ownership of non-custodial wallets (ch.aml.threshold-kyc-mandatory-for-transactions)
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for high-risk clients (e.g., PEPs), unusual transactions, or third-party involvement (ch.aml.enhanced-due-diligence-edd-required)
- Collect personally identifiable information (PII) to prevent fraud, identity theft, and money laundering (ch.aml.collect-personally-identifiable-information-pii)
- Internal controls, staff training, and transaction monitoring (e.g., blockchain analytics for amounts over CHF 1,000) required (ch.aml.internal-controls-staff-training-and)
- Retain client identification data, beneficial owner details, and transaction records for at least 10 years (ch.aml.retain-client-identification-data-beneficial)
- Conduct regular, risk-based reviews to keep data current (ch.aml.conduct-regular-risk-based-reviews-to)
- Suspicious activity reporting to Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) (ch.aml.money-laundering-reporting-office-switzerland)
- Travel Rule obligations apply for crypto transfers (ch.licensing.legislation-amla-anti-money-laundering-act)
- Join a recognized SRO (VQF, SO-FIT, AOOS) for AML compliance and supervision (ch.aml.anti-money-laundering-act-amlagwg-core)
Key Restrictions
- Clients' crypto assets must be held in bankruptcy-remote segregation under the DLT Act (ch.licensing.custody)
- Banking license (CHF 10M+ capital, 12-18 months) or FinTech license (CHF 300K capital, 3-6 months, no lending) required for custodial wallet services holding client crypto assets (ch.licensing.custody)
- No single 'crypto license' — activity-dependent licensing: SRO membership insufficient for custody of third-party assets (ch.licensing.vasp)
- Technology neutrality applies: custody of crypto is regulated same as custody of traditional financial assets based on economic function (ch.licensing.technology-neutrality-regulation-focuses-on)
- A local Swiss entity (corporation) is required to obtain a FINMA license and join an SRO
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity around allocation of AML obligations between SaaS custodian and white-label client — FINMA likely expects both parties to have compliance obligations
- Banking-license burden (CHF 10M+ minimum capital, lengthy process) may be prohibitive for smaller custodial wallet operators
- FinTech license caps deposits at CHF 100M and prohibits lending, limiting business model flexibility
- Enforcement risk if FINMA determines the custody service constitutes unlicensed deposit-taking
- Travel Rule compliance complexity for cross-border crypto transfers handled through the platform
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
FINMA is Switzerland's integrated financial market supervisor (FINMASA Art. 6): it licenses banks, FinTech licence holders, securities firms and DLT trading facilities, supervises AML compliance, and issued the ICO Guidelines (2018) and the stablecoin guidance (06/2024).
Financial intermediaries under AMLA Art. 2(3) without a FINMA licence, the usual route for smaller crypto businesses, must join one of the 10 FINMA-recognised self-regulatory organisations (AMLA Art. 14(1)), which include VQF, SO-FIT, AOOS, PolyReg and ARIF.
The DLT Act (Federal Act of 25 September 2020 on the Adaptation of Federal Law to Developments in Distributed Ledger Technology, AS 2021 33) amends ten federal acts, introducing ledger-based securities, DLT trading facilities and the segregation of crypto-based assets in bankruptcy; it entered into force on 1 February and 1 August 2021.
The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 10 October 1997 (AMLA/GwG, SR 955.0) sets identification, due-diligence and suspicious-activity reporting duties for financial intermediaries, including crypto service providers; the travel rule itself rests on AMLO-FINMA Art. 10 as applied by FINMA Guidance 02/2019.
The Financial Institutions Act of 15 June 2018 (FinIA, SR 954.1), in force since 1 January 2020, licenses portfolio managers, trustees, managers of collective assets, fund management companies and securities firms (Art. 2(1)).
The Banking Act of 8 November 1934 (BA, SR 952.0) governs banking and FinTech licences, while the separate Financial Market Infrastructure Act of 19 June 2015 (FMIA) governs DLT trading facilities; the former securities dealer licence is now the securities firm licence under the Financial Institutions Act (FinIA Art. 41).
Switzerland has no single crypto or VASP licence: by activity, firms need SRO membership under AMLA Art. 14, a FinTech licence (deposits up to CHF 100 million, minimum capital at least CHF 300,000), a banking licence (minimum capital CHF 10 million), a securities-firm licence (FinIA Art. 41) or a DLT trading facility licence (FMIA Art. 73a).
Crypto-based assets that a bank or securities firm undertakes to hold available for a custody client, and that are attributable individually or by a clear co-ownership share, are treated as custody assets segregated from the bankruptcy estate (BankG Art. 16 no. 1bis, inserted by the DLT Act, in force 1 Aug 2021); FINMA Guidance 01/2026 (12 Jan 2026) covers custody risks.
FINMA applies financial market law in a technology-neutral way, focusing on the economic function and purpose of a token ('substance over form') and following the principle 'same risks, same rules' (FINMA releases of 26 Aug 2019 and 11 Sep 2019).
Depending on the activity, a crypto project may need a FINMA banking licence or FinTech licence (BankG Arts. 3, 1b), a securities-firm licence (FinIA Art. 41) or a DLT trading facility licence (FMIA Art. 73a); since FinIA took effect on 1 Jan 2020 there is no securities dealer licence.
The Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA/GwG, SR 955.0, of 10 October 1997) imposes identification, beneficial-owner, documentation and reporting duties (Arts. 3-9) on financial intermediaries, including crypto service providers that professionally accept, hold or help transfer third-party assets (Art. 2(3)); such non-bank intermediaries must join a recognised self-regulatory organisation (Art. 14), while banks and other Art. 2(2) institutions are supervised for AML by FINMA (Art. 12).
Swiss financial intermediaries must identify the contracting party when one virtual-currency transaction, or several that appear linked, reach or exceed CHF 1,000 (AMLO-FINMA Art. 51a(1)); for cash or other anonymous payments, technical measures must prevent linked transactions exceeding that threshold within 30 days (Art. 51a(1bis)); transfers to external wallets require proof of the customer's ownership by suitable technical means (FINMA Guidance 02/2019).
AMLA Art. 6 requires financial intermediaries to clarify the background and purpose of a transaction or business relationship that appears unusual or carries increased risk; relationships with foreign politically exposed persons and their close associates always count as increased-risk (Art. 6(3)), and the frequency of controls follows the client's risk (Art. 6(1)).
Swiss financial intermediaries, including crypto service providers, must verify the identity of the contracting party from a document of evidentiary value when opening a business relationship (AMLA Art. 3(1)) and establish the beneficial owner (AMLA Art. 4).
AMLA Art. 8 requires financial intermediaries to take the organisational measures needed to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, in particular adequate staff training and controls; AMLO-FINMA Art. 20 requires effective monitoring of business relationships and transactions, with an IT-based monitoring system for banks and securities firms.
Financial intermediaries must keep the records of transactions and AML clarifications, including client identification and beneficial-owner documents, for at least ten years after the business relationship ends or the transaction is completed (AMLA Art. 7(3)).
Swiss financial intermediaries must periodically review client documentation for currency and update it as needed, with frequency, scope and type set by the client's risk (AMLA Art. 7(1bis)); the duty applies equally to FINMA-supervised and SRO-affiliated intermediaries, including crypto service providers.
FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, FINMASA Art. 5) supervises banks, securities firms and other institutions under the financial market acts, issues guidance such as the ICO Guidelines of 16 February 2018 on token classification, and supervises AML compliance of Art. 2(2) intermediaries directly; non-bank intermediaries are supervised for AML by recognised SROs (AMLA Art. 12).
The Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS), run by the Federal Office of Police (fedpol), receives and analyses the suspicious activity reports that financial intermediaries, including blockchain service providers, must file under AMLA Art. 9 (AMLA Art. 23).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — custodial wallet / SaaS providers in Switzerland require either a banking license (CHF 10M+ capital) or FinTech license (CHF 300K capital, deposits capped at CHF 100M, no lending) to hold client crypto assets, plus SRO membership for AML compliance, with asset segregation protected under the DLT Act.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
- What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
- What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?