← Regulations / Democratic Republic of the Congo / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Democratic Republic of the Congo with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • General AML/CFT framework applies under Law No. 04/016 of 19 July 2004 (fighting money laundering and terrorist financing).
  • Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) must be filed with CENAREF (Cellule Nationale de Renseignements Financiers), the national Financial Intelligence Unit.
  • Robust KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting expected under FATF best practices even absent crypto-specific rules.
  • If the BCC deems the operator a payment service provider under Law No. 20/017, full AML compliance for payment institutions would apply.

Key Restrictions

  • No specific crypto license exists — the activity falls into an unregulated grey area.
  • The BCC has publicly warned against cryptocurrencies (June 2021, reiterated), stating they are not recognized as legal tender, creating a hostile regulatory stance.
  • If the operator handles any fiat-crypto conversion or fiat payment processing, it may be deemed a payment service provider under Law No. 20/017, requiring BCC authorization.
  • Local incorporation with physical presence and directors is required under general business laws.
  • No legal clarity on segregation of client crypto assets, cold storage mandates, or qualified custodian definitions.

Key Risks

  • Enforcement risk: BCC public warnings and hostile stance toward crypto could lead to informal pressure, shutdown of banking relationships, or cease-and-desist actions despite no formal licensing framework.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: No established application process or timeline; case-by-case interpretation by BCC creates uncertainty for any hybrid fiat-crypto operation.
  • Tax ambiguity: No crypto-specific tax framework — gains treated as ordinary income/corporate profits, with no official guidance on valuation or reporting.
  • Reputational risk: Operating in an unregulated grey area with a central bank warning against crypto may deter institutional partners, banks, and customers.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 80% confidence

Virtual-asset activity in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is prohibited, not unregulated: article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025, amending Loi n° 22/068 du 27 décembre 2022, bans virtual-asset activities and virtual-asset service providers outright, so operating a cryptocurrency exchange or a crypto custody business in the country is unlawful rather than merely unlicensed.

licensing 80% confidence

General Business Registration: Any entity operating in the DRC, regardless of its specific activity, would need to comply with general business registration requirements (e.g., registering with the Ministry of Commerce, obtaining a tax ID, etc.), but these are not specific to financial services or virtual assets.

licensing 80% confidence

Loi n° 20/017 du 25 novembre 2020 is the Congolese telecommunications and ICT statute, regulated by ARPTIC, and its own scope article excludes electronic money; payment services in the Democratic Republic of the Congo are governed by Loi n° 18/019 du 9 juillet 2018 relative aux systèmes de paiement et de règlement-titres, and fiat-to-crypto conversion is in any event prohibited by article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025.

licensing 80% confidence

Implication: A crypto payment processor that converts fiat to crypto or vice-versa, or handles fiat payments in general, might be interpreted by the BCC as falling under the scope of existing payment services regulation, requiring an authorization from the BCC. This would be decided on a case-by-case basis and is subject to interpretation given the lack of specific definitions for virtual assets within this law.

licensing 80% confidence

Payment-services and electronic-money licensing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo rests on Loi n° 18/019 du 9 juillet 2018 relative aux systèmes de paiement et de règlement-titres, whose article 108 provides that nobody may establish or operate a payment system or issue payment instruments without an agrément granted by the Banque Centrale du Congo; Loi n° 20/017 du 25 novembre 2020 is the telecommunications and ICT statute and confers no such power.

licensing 80% confidence

The general AML/CFT framework of the Democratic Republic of the Congo is Loi n° 22/068 du 27 décembre 2022, which replaced Loi n° 04/016 du 19 juillet 2004, as amended by Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025; the amending law is crypto-specific, since its article 22 bis prohibits virtual-asset activities and virtual-asset service providers in the country.

licensing 80% confidence

The Cellule Nationale des Renseignements Financiers (CENAREF) is the Congolese financial intelligence unit responsible for receiving, analysing and transmitting suspicious transaction reports on money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing, and it is the central and sole structure for that purpose under Loi n° 22/068 du 27 décembre 2022.

licensing 80% confidence

Even in the absence of specific crypto regulations, any legitimate financial operation (or one seeking future legitimacy) should adhere to international AML/CFT best practices (e.g., FATF recommendations), including robust KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting. Failure to do so could lead to future legal issues or blacklisting.

licensing 80% confidence

Local Presence: General business laws would require any company operating in the DRC to have a registered local presence (e.g., a local office, local directors, registration with the relevant commercial registries).

licensing 80% confidence

No application process for a virtual-asset licence exists in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and none can exist, because article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025 prohibits virtual-asset activities and virtual-asset service providers outright rather than leaving them unregulated.

licensing 80% confidence

An applicant for a Congolese payment-services agrément files with the Banque Centrale du Congo under article 108 of Loi n° 18/019 du 9 juillet 2018, which requires a dossier covering the business plan, internal control, capital adequacy and operational safeguards and sets a sixty-day decision period; Loi n° 20/017 du 25 novembre 2020 is the telecommunications statute and opens no such application route, and no route of any kind exists for virtual-asset business, which article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025 prohibits.

licensing 80% confidence

Banque Centrale du Congo (BCC) (Central Bank of Congo)

custody 80% confidence

The Democratic Republic of the Congo licenses no cryptocurrency custodian because Article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025, amending Loi n° 22/068 du 27 décembre 2022, prohibits virtual-asset activities and virtual-asset service providers outright, so no custody licence category can arise under BCC-supervised financial-sector law.

custody 80% confidence

Reference: The general position of the BCC can be found in various communiques and statements. For instance, the Communiqué of the Banque Centrale du Congo (BCC) dated December 14, 2021, warned the public against the use of cryptocurrencies, highlighting their lack of legal framework and associated risks. While a direct, stable URL to the specific communiqué can be elusive on the BCC's dynamic site, its content is widely reported and reflects the official position.

custody 80% confidence

No Democratic Republic of the Congo instrument imposes a 15% or any other crypto-asset tax, and none imposes insurance or bonding requirements on cryptocurrency custodians; Article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025 instead prohibits virtual-asset activities and virtual-asset service providers throughout the DRC.

Evidence fact cd.custody.cold-storage-mandates not found (may have been renamed).

enforcement 95% confidence

The Banque Centrale du Congo's public crypto warnings are its avis au public dated 9 November 2018 against the illegal collection of public savings through a purported cryptocurrency, and its communiqué of 7 July 2020 stating that crypto-assets are neither regulated nor authorised to operate in the DRC; the BCC's own avis index records no June 2021 warning.

tax 95% confidence

The Democratic Republic of the Congo levies no standalone capital gains tax; gains are absorbed into ordinary income or business profits, and since the direct-tax reform of Loi n° 23/053 du 30 novembre 2023 the DGI lists plus-values as one of six categories of income charged to the impot sur le revenu des personnes physiques, while company gains fall into taxable profit charged to the impot sur les societes at 30 per cent.

tax 90% confidence

Congolese company profits are taxed at 30 per cent of net taxable profit under the impot sur les societes established by Loi n° 23/053 du 30 novembre 2023, subject to a minimum charge of 1 per cent of annual turnover where the result is a loss or yields less than that minimum; no company may lawfully book virtual-asset profits in the DRC, because article 22 bis of Loi n° 25/048 du 1er juillet 2025 prohibits virtual-asset activity and virtual-asset service providers.

tax 95% confidence

Specific reporting requirements for crypto holdings or transactions.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP can operate in the DRC only through a locally incorporated entity, but faces a hostile regulatory environment (BCC anti-crypto warnings), no specific crypto licensing framework, and potential reclassification as a payment service provider under Law No. 20/017 if handling fiat, creating substantial legal uncertainty and enforcement risk.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?