Is Crypto Legal in Haiti?

Loi du 11 novembre 2013 relative à la Lutte Contre le Blanchiment d'Argent et le Financement du Terrorisme (Law of November 11, 2013, relating to the Fight Against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism): This is the cornerstone of Haiti's AML/CFT framework. It defines money laundering and terrorist financing offenses, sets out reporting obligations for designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) and financial institutions, and establishes the powers of the UCREF.

Décret du 10 mars 2005 instituant l'Unité de Lutte Contre le Blanchiment d'Argent (Decree of March 10, 2005, instituting the Unit for the Fight Against Money Laundering): This decree established the UCREF as Haiti's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and outlined its structure and functions.

Obtaining and verifying the identity of natural persons (name, date of birth, address, nationality, official identification number – e.g., passport, national ID card).

Obtaining and verifying the identity of legal persons (name, legal form, address, proof of incorporation/existence, names of directors/senior management).

Using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information for verification.

Beneficial Ownership (BO): Identifying and taking reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of customers, including understanding the ownership and control structure of legal persons. This typically involves identifying individuals who own or control more than a certain percentage (e.g., 25%) of the entity, or who exercise control through other means.

Purpose and Nature of Business Relationship: Understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or transaction.

Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring the business relationship and transactions undertaken by customers to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including the source of funds where necessary.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): For higher-risk customers or transactions (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), complex or unusually large transactions, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, or transactions involving privacy-enhancing virtual assets), VASPs must apply EDD measures, such as:

Obtaining additional information on the customer and BO.

Obtaining information on the source of funds or wealth.

Obtaining approval from senior management for establishing or continuing the business relationship.

Obligation to Report: Reporting any transaction (or attempted transaction) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of a criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing, regardless of the amount.

"No Tipping-Off": Prohibiting the VASP or its employees from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR is being or has been filed.

Red Flags: Developing internal procedures to identify "red flags" specific to virtual assets that may indicate money laundering or terrorist financing (e.g., unusual transaction patterns, rapid transfers of large sums, use of mixers/tumblers, unexplained sources of funds, attempts to avoid CDD).

Customer Identification Records: All records obtained through CDD, including copies of identification documents.

Transaction Records: Details of all domestic and international transactions, including the amount, currency (both fiat and virtual asset type), date, method of payment, and the identities of the originator and beneficiary (including wallet addresses).

Analysis and STRs: Records of any analysis undertaken concerning suspicious transactions and copies of all STRs filed.

Retention Period: Records must generally be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship ends or after the date of the transaction.

Role: Haiti's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). It is the central authority for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports (STRs) and other relevant information to competent authorities (e.g., law enforcement) for the investigation and prosecution of money laundering and terrorist financing.

Role: The Central Bank of Haiti. While not explicitly stated for "VASPs" currently, the BRH is the prudential regulator and supervisor for traditional financial institutions. Should Haiti introduce specific regulation or licensing for VASPs, it is highly probable that the BRH would be designated as the primary supervisory authority for their AML/CFT compliance, or at least play a significant role in their oversight. The BRH has previously issued warnings regarding the risks of cryptocurrencies.

Lack of Specific Regulation: The absence of specific VASP regulations in Haiti means that VASPs should proactively align themselves with international best practices (e.g., FATF recommendations for VAs and VASPs) and interpret Haiti's existing AML/CFT laws broadly to cover their operations.

Travel Rule: While not explicitly legislated for VAs in Haiti, FATF Recommendation 16 (the "Travel Rule") applies to VASPs. This means VASPs should gather and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers above a certain threshold (e.g., $1,000/€1,000).

Sanctions Compliance: VASPs must screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN Security Council sanctions).

Internal Controls: VASPs should establish robust internal AML/CFT programs, including the appointment of a compliance officer, employee training, internal audit functions, and risk assessment procedures.

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Financing of Terrorism (CFT) Obligations: This is the most significant area where virtual asset businesses operating in Haiti, or serving Haitian customers, must be compliant. Haiti is a member of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), which is an associate member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). FATF Recommendations explicitly require countries to regulate and supervise VASPs for AML/CFT purposes.

Even without a specific VASP licensing law, any entity facilitating financial transactions, including those involving virtual assets, is generally expected to adhere to Haiti's existing AML/CFT legislation. This implies implementing KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting (SARs), and other AML/CFT controls.

The Unité Centrale de Renseignements Financiers (UCREF) is Haiti's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and is responsible for receiving and analyzing SARs and combating money laundering and terrorist financing. VASPs, like traditional financial institutions, would be expected to report to UCREF.

Exchanges, Custody Providers, Payment Processors (Cryptocurrency-Specific): No specific license required solely for crypto activities.

Hybrid Businesses: If a business combines crypto services with traditional financial services (e.g., fiat currency exchange, remittances in fiat, deposit-taking), it would likely require appropriate licenses from the BRH for those traditional services.

Neither specifically exists for VASPs. Haiti has not yet implemented the FATF recommendation for countries to license or register VASPs.

Capital Requirements: Not applicable for crypto-only services without a dedicated licensing regime. However, any entity requiring a BRH license for traditional financial services would have specific capital requirements.

AML/KYC Requirements: CRUCIAL. Even without specific crypto regulations, it is highly advisable and often implicitly required under Haiti's general AML/CFT law for any entity dealing with financial transactions to:

Implement robust Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures (identity verification, customer due diligence).

Monitor transactions for suspicious activities.

Report suspicious transactions to UCREF.

Have internal AML policies, controls, and a designated compliance officer.

Local Presence: Generally, any financial services business operating in Haiti is expected to have a local legal entity and physical presence. This would likely be a requirement if a crypto business were to seek a traditional financial license or if specific crypto regulations were introduced.

Fit and proper assessment of directors and shareholders.

Detailed operational and risk management frameworks.

The primary financial regulator. While they haven't issued specific crypto regulations, any future framework would likely come from them.

Note: You'll find general banking and financial sector regulations here, but nothing specific to crypto.

Loi du 20 février 2013 portant sur la lutte contre le blanchiment d'avoirs et le financement du terrorisme (Law of February 20, 2013, on the Fight Against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing):

This is Haiti's primary AML/CFT law. It is crucial for any entity dealing with financial transactions. While it doesn't explicitly mention "virtual assets" (being from 2013), its principles and obligations extend to activities that could facilitate money laundering or terrorist financing.

Finding a direct official government link can be challenging for Haitian laws, but the law's existence and content are well-documented by legal firms and international bodies.

Responsible for receiving and analyzing suspicious transaction reports (STRs).

Note: Any VASP operating in Haiti should understand its obligations to UCREF under the general AML/CFT framework.

Haiti is a member, and CFATF reports often include recommendations regarding VASP regulation.

Note: Searching for "Haiti" on the CFATF website might yield mutual evaluation reports that highlight the country's AML/CFT framework and recommendations, including potential future VASP regulation.

Comply fully with Haiti's existing AML/CFT laws and be prepared for potential future VASP-specific regulations.

Monitor developments from the BRH and UCREF closely.

Seek independent legal counsel in Haiti to understand the application of general financial laws to their specific business model and to ensure compliance with current and evolving legal obligations.

Be aware that international pressure (FATF/CFATF) will likely lead to the introduction of VASP-specific licensing or registration requirements in the future.

Approach: Partial / Largely Unregulated with Cautious Warnings. While there isn't an outright ban, there's no specific framework for licensing, operating, or supervising virtual asset service providers (VASPs) or crypto activities. The existing anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) framework is the primary, albeit indirect, mechanism that could be applied to financial institutions dealing with virtual assets. The central bank has issued warnings regarding the risks.

Banque de la République d'Haïti (BRH) - The Central Bank of Haiti.

Role: While not a crypto regulator, the BRH is responsible for the overall stability of the financial system, monetary policy, and oversight of traditional financial institutions. It has issued warnings about the risks associated with cryptocurrencies. It would be the primary body to initiate any future comprehensive regulation.

Role: The UCRF is responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports (STRs) related to money laundering and terrorist financing. While the 2005 AML/CFT law doesn't explicitly name "virtual assets," the UCRF would interpret its mandate to cover any financial transactions suspected of illicit activity, including those involving crypto if they flow through regulated entities or trigger other reporting obligations. Haiti, as a member of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), is under pressure to align with FATF Recommendations, which do cover virtual assets.

URL: Information about UCRF can often be found on the BRH website or through international bodies like the Egmont Group, but a direct, standalone UCRF website is not easily accessible. Its legal basis stems from the AML/CFT law (see below).

Loi du 11 mai 2005 relative au blanchiment d'avoirs et au financement du terrorisme (Law of May 11, 2005, on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing)

Relevance to Crypto: This law establishes the general AML/CFT framework in Haiti. While it predates the widespread use of cryptocurrencies and does not explicitly mention them, it forms the basis for the UCRF's operations and imposes obligations on traditional financial institutions. If virtual assets are converted to fiat through a regulated financial institution (e.g., banks, money transfer operators), these entities would be subject to the law's reporting requirements.

Reference to CFATF Reports (which discuss the law): CFATF Website - Haiti Reports (You'll need to navigate to the specific reports, such as the 2018 Mutual Evaluation Report, to see detailed discussions of Haiti's AML/CFT framework).

Crypto trading is not explicitly prohibited for individuals in Haiti.

However, it operates in a regulatory vacuum, meaning there are no specific consumer protections, licensing requirements for trading platforms, or clear legal recourse in case of fraud or loss of funds specific to virtual assets.

The BRH has issued general warnings about the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including their volatility, lack of underlying assets, and potential for use in illicit activities.

There is no specific licensing or regulatory framework for cryptocurrency exchanges (Virtual Asset Service Providers - VASPs) operating within Haiti.

Foreign-based cryptocurrency exchanges are accessible to Haitian residents, but they operate outside Haitian jurisdiction, meaning local authorities have no oversight or control over their operations or the funds held by their users.

Any entity attempting to operate a local crypto exchange would likely fall under general business registration laws but would not be subject to financial regulations specifically tailored to virtual assets, leading to a lack of oversight regarding AML/CFT specific to crypto, capital requirements, or consumer protection.

Haiti has not established a specific legal framework for cryptocurrency or virtual asset regulation, and no dedicated licensing regime exists for crypto businesses. Haiti - United States Department of State

Haiti is not a FATF member but is a member of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), a FATF-style regional body. Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF)

Haiti was added to the FATF "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring" (grey list) in June 2021 due to strategic AML/CFT deficiencies, and as of June 2026 remains on that list. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

No entity has been licensed to operate a cryptocurrency business or virtual asset service provider in Haiti, as no licensing framework exists for such activities. Haiti - United States Department of State

The practical reality is that crypto activity operates in a regulatory vacuum, with the central bank and financial authorities having not yet issued digital asset-specific AML rules. Haiti - United States Department of State

Haiti is a member of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), which is the FATF-style regional body for the Caribbean region, including Haiti. Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF)

Haiti is not listed as a FATF member country; the FATF membership list includes countries such as Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, but not Haiti. Haiti

Haiti was added to the FATF "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring" list on June 25, 2021, along with Malta, the Philippines, and South Sudan, while Ghana was removed. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

The FATF has issued public statements concerning Haiti's strategic AML/CFT deficiencies, with the most recent CFATF Public Statement on Haiti issued in November 2017. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

Haiti remains on the FATF "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring" list as of the June 2026 update, meaning it is actively working with the FATF to address strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

The FATF published a progress report on Haiti on January 31, 2026, analyzing Haiti's progress in addressing technical compliance deficiencies identified in its 2019 mutual evaluation. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Haiti also remained under increased monitoring in the February 2025, June 2025, and October 2025 FATF updates. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 21 February 2025

Haiti was also listed under increased monitoring in the June 2025 and October 2025 FATF statements. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 24 October 2025

A previous CFATF Public Statement on Haiti and Suriname was issued in June 2016, indicating ongoing AML/CFT concerns prior to the 2017 statement. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti and Suriname

The FATF identifies jurisdictions under increased monitoring as those actively working with the FATF to address strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

The United States Department of State's 2025 Investment Climate Statement for Haiti notes the absence of a digital asset regulatory framework in the country. Haiti - United States Department of State

Haiti's AML/CFT framework is subject to FATF mutual evaluation processes, with the 2019 mutual evaluation identifying technical compliance deficiencies that Haiti has been working to address. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Haiti has not established any licensing or registration framework specifically for cryptocurrency exchanges, digital asset service providers, or virtual asset businesses. Haiti - United States Department of State

No entity has been licensed as a virtual asset service provider in Haiti, as no such licensing regime exists. Haiti - United States Department of State

There is no evidence in the provided sources of any capital requirements, application procedures, or structural requirements for crypto business licensing in Haiti. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

The absence of a crypto licensing framework means there is no regulatory pathway for businesses seeking to legally operate cryptocurrency services in Haiti. Haiti - United States Department of State

The FATF's identification of Haiti under increased monitoring relates to general AML/CFT deficiencies, not to any specific crypto licensing regime, as none has been established. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Zero entities have been licensed to conduct virtual asset activities in Haiti. Haiti - United States Department of State

Haiti's AML/CFT regime has been evaluated by the FATF and found to have strategic deficiencies, which is why it remains under increased monitoring. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

U.S. financial institutions are reminded that Haiti's presence on the increased monitoring list triggers enhanced due diligence obligations for correspondent accounts maintained for Haitian financial institutions under 31 CFR § 1010.610(a). Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

Covered U.S. financial institutions must ensure their due diligence programs for correspondent accounts include appropriate, specific, risk-based, and enhanced policies, procedures, and controls reasonably designed to detect and report known or suspected money laundering activity involving Haitian financial institutions. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

Haiti's 2019 mutual evaluation identified technical compliance deficiencies in its AML/CFT framework, and a January 2026 FATF report analyzes Haiti's progress in addressing those deficiencies. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

The FATF requires jurisdictions under increased monitoring to address strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

No specific CDD, EDD, STR reporting thresholds, record retention periods, or beneficial ownership requirements for virtual asset transactions have been identified in the available sources for Haiti. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

The CFATF issued a Public Statement on Haiti in November 2017, highlighting AML/CFT deficiencies in the country. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

A prior CFATF Public Statement on Haiti and Suriname was issued in June 2016, indicating ongoing concerns about Haiti's AML/CFT regime. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti and Suriname

Haiti was added to the FATF Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring list on June 25, 2021, a form of international action reflecting deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

Haiti remains under FATF increased monitoring as of the February 2025, June 2025, October 2025, and June 2026 updates. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 21 February 2025

A January 31, 2026 FATF report analyzed Haiti's progress in addressing technical compliance deficiencies identified in its 2019 mutual evaluation. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

No specific enforcement actions, fines, arrests, or penalties related to cryptocurrency or virtual asset activities in Haiti were identified in the provided sources. Haiti - United States Department of State

No tax guidance has been issued for virtual assets in Haiti. Haiti - United States Department of State

The United States Department of State's 2025 Investment Climate Statement for Haiti does not mention any tax treatment rules for cryptocurrency gains, capital gains on digital assets, or VAT treatment of virtual asset transactions. Haiti - United States Department of State

There is no evidence in the available sources of any Haitian tax authority guidance addressing how cryptocurrency gains would be taxed. CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

Haiti has no dedicated legal framework for cryptocurrency or virtual asset regulation, creating significant legal uncertainty for businesses. Haiti - United States Department of State

There is no licensing regime for virtual asset service providers in Haiti, meaning legitimate crypto businesses cannot obtain regulatory authorization. Haiti - United States Department of State

Haiti's continued presence on the FATF increased monitoring list creates reputational risk and enhanced due diligence burdens for Haitian financial institutions dealing with foreign correspondent banks. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

U.S. financial institutions must apply enhanced due diligence to correspondent accounts involving Haitian financial institutions, which could constrain cross-border crypto-related banking relationships. Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

The FATF's identification of Haiti under increased monitoring represents an implementation gap between Haiti's paper AML/CFT framework and the practical requirements of international standards. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Haiti's 2019 mutual evaluation found technical compliance deficiencies that remained significant enough to warrant continued increased monitoring through at least 2026. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Businesses operating in the crypto space in Haiti face the risk of operating without any legal protection or regulatory clarity, given the complete absence of virtual asset-specific rules. Haiti - United States Department of State

The lack of a crypto-specific AML framework in Haiti is a significant gap, particularly given the FATF's evolving standards on virtual assets which the country would be expected to adopt. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Counter-Proliferation Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov

Haiti - United States Department of State

CFATF Public Statement on Haiti

Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 24 October 2025

Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF)

Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 June 2025

Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026

CFATF Public Statement on Haiti and Suriname

Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 21 February 2025

Asset Freeze: Requires all UN member states to freeze funds, other financial assets, and economic resources owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by designated individuals and entities.

Travel Ban: Imposes a travel ban on designated individuals.

Targeted Arms Embargo: Prohibits the direct or indirect supply, sale, or transfer of small arms, light weapons, and related ammunition to designated individuals and entities in Haiti.

VASPs must screen their customers, beneficial owners, and transaction counterparties against the UN Security Council Consolidated Sanctions List, specifically looking for individuals and entities designated under the Haiti sanctions regime.

Any detected matches (hits) trigger an obligation to freeze assets and block transactions, as well as report to relevant authorities (Financial Intelligence Units, central banks).

UNSC Resolution 2653 (2022): https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N22/633/32/PDF/N2263332.pdf?OpenElement

UNSC Resolution 2700 (2023): https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N23/305/74/PDF/N2330574.pdf?OpenElement

UN Security Council Sanctions Committees (1000 Haiti Sanctions Committee): https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/2653 (This page lists designated individuals and entities).

Blocking (Asset Freeze): U.S. persons (including U.S. companies, their foreign branches, and persons operating within the U.S.) are prohibited from engaging in any transactions with designated individuals and entities. All property and interests in property of designated persons that are in the United States or come within the possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked.

General Prohibitions: Prohibitions extend to making or receiving any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services to or for the benefit of any designated person, or receiving any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

U.S.-based VASPs, and foreign VASPs that have a U.S. nexus (e.g., U.S. customers, servers, or transactions cleared through the U.S. financial system), must screen all customers and transactions against OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List and other relevant sanctions lists (e.g., Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List, Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List).

Any match with a Haiti-related SDN or other designated person triggers blocking obligations and reporting to OFAC.

Beyond specific Haiti designations, VASPs must comply with all other relevant OFAC sanctions programs (e.g., if a transaction involves a sanctioned jurisdiction like Iran or North Korea, or a designated terrorist organization, it would be prohibited regardless of its Haiti connection).

OFAC Sanctions Programs and Country Information - Haiti: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/haiti-sanctions (This page provides links to relevant Executive Orders and designated individuals).

OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List: https://www.treasury.gov/ofac/downloads/sdnlist.txt

The EU implements the UN sanctions regime against Haiti.

It may also adopt additional autonomous designations mirroring or expanding upon UN or OFAC designations under its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

Measures typically include asset freezes and prohibitions on making funds or economic resources available to designated individuals and entities.

VASPs operating in the EU must screen their customers, beneficial owners, and transaction counterparties against the EU Consolidated Sanctions List. This list includes individuals and entities designated under the EU's Haiti sanctions regime.

Any matches trigger asset freezing and reporting obligations to the relevant national competent authorities in the EU Member State.

EU Sanctions Map (Search for Haiti): https://www.sanctionsmap.eu/#/main

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2275 of 21 November 2022 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Haiti: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2022/2275/oj

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2274 of 21 November 2022 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Haiti: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2274/oj

Know Your Customer (KYC) / Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Implement robust KYC/CDD procedures to identify and verify the identity of customers, including beneficial owners, and assess their risk profile. This is foundational for effective sanctions screening.

Real-time and Batch Screening: Screen all new and existing customers, as well as all transaction counterparties, against the most current versions of:

UN Security Council Consolidated Sanctions List (specifically the Haiti sanctions list).

OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List: https://www.treasury.gov/ofac/downloads/sdnlist.txt

Any other relevant national sanctions lists (e.g., Canada, UK, Switzerland, if the VASP has nexus to those jurisdictions).

Enhanced Due Diligence: For high-risk customers or transactions involving Haiti, conduct enhanced due diligence to identify potential sanctions evasion or illicit finance risks.

While Haiti itself is not a comprehensively sanctioned jurisdiction, transactions directly or indirectly involving designated individuals or entities within Haiti are prohibited.

VASPs must also avoid facilitating transactions for residents or entities in comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (e.g., Iran, North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Crimea region, Donetsk/Luhansk/Zaporizhzhia/Kherson regions of Ukraine) regardless of any direct link to Haiti.

Transaction Monitoring: Implement automated transaction monitoring systems to detect suspicious patterns, unusually large transactions, transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions, or transactions potentially linked to sanctioned entities or individuals.

Blocked Property Reports: If a VASP blocks assets or rejects a transaction due to a sanctions match, it must typically report this to the relevant authorities (e.g., OFAC in the U.S., national competent authorities in the EU, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in Haiti if domestically relevant).

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) / Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs): File SARs/STRs with the relevant FIU (e.g., UCREF in Haiti, FinCEN in the U.S.) for any activity suspected of being related to sanctions evasion, money laundering, or terrorism financing.

Travel Rule Compliance: For cross-border crypto transfers exceeding a certain threshold (e.g., $1,000 USD or equivalent, as per FATF guidance), VASPs must transmit and receive required originator and beneficiary information. This information is crucial for effective sanctions screening.

FATF Guidance for VASPs: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-vasps-red-flag-indicators.html

Regulatory Landscape for Crypto: Haiti's regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies is nascent. The Banque de la République d'Haïti (BRH - Central Bank of Haiti) has not yet issued comprehensive regulations specifically governing cryptocurrencies, nor has it banned them outright.

Banque de la République d'Haïti (BRH): https://www.brh.ht/

Implementation of International Sanctions: As a UN member state, Haiti is legally obliged to implement UN Security Council Resolutions, including Resolution 2653 and 2700. This typically falls under the purview of its financial intelligence unit (FIU), Unité Centrale de Renseignements Financiers (UCREF), and the BRH, which are responsible for enforcing AML/CFT laws and international sanctions domestically.

UCREF (Haiti's FIU): https://www.ucref.gouv.ht/ (UCREF would be the primary contact for SAR/STR reporting in Haiti and for providing guidance on domestic implementation of UN sanctions).

Civil Penalties: Can range from thousands to millions of dollars per violation, depending on the program, severity, and intent.

Criminal Penalties: For willful violations, individuals can face substantial fines (up to millions of dollars) and long prison sentences (up to 20 years), while corporations can face much larger fines.

Reputational Damage: Significant damage to reputation, loss of licenses, and exclusion from the financial system.

Member State Enforcement: Penalties are determined by individual EU Member States, typically involving fines (often substantial) and imprisonment for serious violations.

Reputational Damage: Similar to the U.S., non-compliance can lead to severe reputational harm.

While the UN itself does not directly enforce penalties on private entities, non-compliance with UN sanctions by member states (or entities within them) can lead to political condemnation, and potential "secondary sanctions" or enforcement actions from countries like the U.S. and EU that prioritize enforcing these regimes.

Haiti (Domestic): Haiti's domestic laws would outline penalties for failing to comply with UN Security Council resolutions, typically involving fines and imprisonment, although specific precedents for crypto-related sanctions violations would be rare given the nascent regulatory environment.

Haiti does not have a domestic, crypto-specific sanctions list.

Its primary obligation concerning "country-specific sanctions lists" related to Haiti is to implement and enforce the UN Security Council Haiti Sanctions List established under Resolution 2653 (and subsequently updated).

For VASPs globally, compliance requires screening against the UN Consolidated Sanctions List, the OFAC SDN List (which includes Haiti-specific designations), and the EU Consolidated Sanctions List (which also includes Haiti-specific designations). These international lists are the relevant "country-specific" sources for designated individuals and entities tied to Haiti.