Is Crypto Legal in Ethiopia?

Public Prohibitions and Warnings: The NBE consistently reminds the public that crypto is illegal.

Criminal Enforcement: Individuals found engaging in illegal activities (like illicit foreign exchange or money laundering) where crypto is used as a medium might face criminal prosecution under existing laws, rather than a specific "cryptocurrency enforcement action" by a financial regulator. These are typically handled by law enforcement and the justice system, not the NBE issuing administrative fines to a crypto company.

Regulator Name: National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE)

Ethiopia's Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation was initially based on ongoing armed conflict and emergency conditions, with warnings and designations issued in 2022, extended and redesignated in 2024, and terminated effective December 2025. As of the latest regulatory action, the TPS designation is no longer in effect, and the situation has moved to termination rather than being 'ongoing.'

National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) Official Website: This is the primary source for all financial regulations and official statements. While a specific "Cryptocurrency Licensing Directive" does not exist, general financial directives and public advisories can be found here.

Cryptocurrencies are not yet explicitly illegal in Ethiopia and are not recognized as legal tender, indicating the original widely reported statement is outdated.

Reputable Ethiopian news sources reported the National Bank of Ethiopia's (NBE) press release on the ban of virtual assets, but the reporting appears to reflect an older regulatory stance without recent updates.

The FBC article from June 2022 reported an NBE warning that has since been expanded to cover other virtual assets; thus, the article no longer fully represents the current regulatory stance.

The National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) prohibits any transactions of virtual assets, as confirmed by the Ethiopian Monitor on July 23 2026.

Further Clarifications and Reinforcement (Ongoing): The NBE has consistently held this position. While specific new "enforcement actions" are not announced, the continuous prohibition serves as the regulatory framework. For instance, the NBE's stance often comes up in discussions about digital currency and fintech.

Lack of regulatory oversight and consumer protection.

Potential for illicit financial activities (money laundering, terrorism financing).

Impact on foreign exchange reserves and capital controls.

Cryptocurrency Exchanges: No licenses are available, as trading cryptocurrencies is generally prohibited.

Cryptocurrency Custody Providers: No licenses are available, as holding or managing cryptocurrencies for third parties is not recognized or permitted.

Cryptocurrency Payment Processors: No licenses are available. While the NBE does license payment instrument issuers and payment system operators for traditional fiat-based digital payments (like mobile money services), these licenses explicitly exclude virtual assets.

Capital Requirements: Significant minimum capital requirements to ensure financial stability and protect consumers.

AML/KYC (Anti-Money Laundering/Know Your Customer): Strict AML/KYC obligations, aligning with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), to prevent illicit finance. This would involve robust identity verification, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting.

Local Presence: A requirement for a locally incorporated entity with physical presence and local management/staff.

Cybersecurity and Data Protection: Strong requirements for protecting customer data and securing platforms against cyber threats.

Consumer Protection: Measures to protect users from fraud, manipulation, and operational failures.

National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) Official Website: This is the primary source for all financial regulations and official statements. While a specific "Cryptocurrency Licensing Directive" does not exist, general financial directives and public advisories can be found here.

The NBE has, on multiple occasions, issued warnings against the use and trading of cryptocurrencies. For instance, in May 2022 and again in August 2023, the NBE publicly warned citizens that cryptocurrencies are illegal in Ethiopia and are not recognized as a medium of exchange. They reiterated that "any transaction carried out using virtual currency is illegal" and advised against engaging in such activities due to associated risks including money laundering, terrorism financing, and consumer fraud.

Payment Systems Directives (Contextual): While these don't apply to crypto, they illustrate the NBE's approach to digital payments generally. The NBE issues various directives governing payment instrument issuers and payment system operators, which are exclusively for fiat-based transactions. These directives implicitly exclude cryptocurrencies by not recognizing them.

For example: Payment Instruments Issuance Directive No. ONPS/02/2020 (or similar subsequent directives) regulates mobile money and other digital payment services. These do not extend to virtual assets.

Extensive research and pilot programs.

Development of a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework.

Ethiopia does not have a specific legal framework regulating cryptocurrency or virtual assets as of 2025–2026; the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) maintains that the Birr is the only legal tender and has historically prohibited crypto transactions Ethiopia.

The Financial Intelligence Service (FIS) is the designated AML/CFT authority in Ethiopia, operating under the national AML/CFT policy framework, but there is no dedicated licensing regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) national anti-money laundering.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT framework is assessed by the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG), with the country remaining in enhanced follow-up due to outstanding deficiencies including those related to financial institution supervision Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

No entity has been licensed to operate as a cryptocurrency exchange or VASP in Ethiopia; the practical reality is that crypto activity operates outside formal regulatory structures and carries legal risk under existing financial laws Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Businesses considering crypto operations in Ethiopia face significant uncertainty and risk, as there is neither a pathway to compliance nor a prohibition that would provide legal clarity; the absence of a VASP regime is a critical gap highlighted by international assessors Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The Financial Intelligence Service (FIS) is Ethiopia's central authority for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, and it operates under the national AML/CFT policy framework national anti-money laundering.

The National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) serves as the central bank and financial regulator, exercising authority over banking and financial activities, including the issuance of currency and payment systems Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

The Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG) is the FATF-style regional body responsible for evaluating Ethiopia's compliance with AML/CFT standards Ethiopia.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has reviewed and endorsed Ethiopia's mutual evaluation report, making the country subject to FATF's global AML/CFT standards Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT framework includes the national AML/CFT policy, which establishes the strategic direction and institutional responsibilities for anti-money laundering efforts in the country national anti-money laundering.

The legal framework for AML/CFT in Ethiopia is described as "generally solid" by the World Bank and ESAAMLG, though implementation has been identified as an area of weakness Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

The 2015 mutual evaluation report assessed Ethiopia's compliance with the FATF Recommendations, covering areas including criminalization of money laundering, confiscation measures, and terrorist financing offenses Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT regime has been subject to multiple follow-up assessments, with the most recent technical compliance upgrades occurring in 2022 Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Ethiopia is a member of ESAAMLG and is assessed under the FATF's mutual evaluation framework, with its assessment formally adopted by ESAAMLG on 5 June 2015 Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Ethiopia remains in enhanced follow-up status due to outstanding deficiencies in technical compliance and effectiveness of its AML/CFT system Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The FATF has not listed Ethiopia as a high-risk jurisdiction, but the country's AML/CFT framework continues to require improvement according to assessors Ethiopia.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT efforts are described as "recent" but with a legal framework that is "generally solid," indicating a developing but maturing regime Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

There is no licensing regime for cryptocurrency exchanges, virtual asset service providers (VASPs), or digital asset businesses in Ethiopia as of 2025–2026 Ethiopia.

No entity has been licensed by the National Bank of Ethiopia or any other Ethiopian authority to conduct virtual asset transactions or custody services national anti-money laundering.

The financial sector in Ethiopia is subject to regulation and supervision, but virtual assets are not currently classified as financial instruments under the existing AML/CFT framework Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

No entities have actually been licensed for crypto activities in Ethiopia; the licensing framework simply does not exist for this sector Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The absence of a VASP licensing regime is a significant gap in Ethiopia's AML/CFT framework, as the FATF Recommendations require countries to regulate and supervise virtual asset service providers Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

No capital requirements, application processes, or timelines have been established for crypto or digital asset businesses, as no such licensing pathway exists national anti-money laundering.

Businesses seeking to engage in digital asset activities in Ethiopia must operate without a formal authorization framework, creating significant legal uncertainty Ethiopia.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT framework requires financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses to comply with customer due diligence (CDD) obligations, transaction monitoring, and reporting requirements, which are assessed under the FATF Recommendations Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

The national AML/CFT policy establishes the framework for identifying and assessing money laundering and terrorist financing risks, applying a risk-based approach to compliance obligations national anti-money laundering.

Ethiopia's 2015 mutual evaluation identified specific technical compliance deficiencies, with Recommendation 1 (assessing risk and applying risk-based approach) rated non-compliant and Recommendation 2 (national cooperation and coordination) rated partially compliant Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Recommendation 24, concerning transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons, was upgraded from partially compliant (PC) to largely compliant (LC) in the 2022 follow-up report, indicating progress in beneficial ownership transparency Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The money laundering offense (Recommendation 3) was rated largely compliant, and confiscation measures (Recommendation 4) and terrorist financing offense (Recommendation 5) were also rated largely compliant in the 2015 assessment Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Suspicious transaction reporting (STR), record retention, and enhanced due diligence (EDD) requirements for politically exposed persons (PEPs) are part of Ethiopia's AML/CFT obligations, though no specific provisions for virtual assets have been enacted Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Ethiopia has made "significant progress" in addressing deficiencies in technical compliance, but outstanding issues remain across other Recommendations and Immediate Outcomes Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The Financial Intelligence Service (FIS) is responsible for receiving and analyzing suspicious transaction reports and disseminating intelligence to law enforcement authorities national anti-money laundering.

The 2015 mutual evaluation report by the World Bank and ESAAMLG documented Ethiopia's AML/CFT system weaknesses and identified priority actions for improvement, but no specific enforcement actions against digital asset businesses are documented in these official sources Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

The 2022 follow-up report prepared by ESAAMLG focused on technical compliance improvements rather than enforcement outcomes, indicating that enforcement capacity remains a challenge Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Ethiopia remains in enhanced follow-up due to "outstanding deficiencies in other Recommendations as well as in the Immediate Outcomes," which includes effectiveness gaps in supervision and enforcement Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The absence of documented enforcement actions against crypto businesses should be understood in the context of the overall lack of a legal framework for virtual assets, not as confirmation of a compliant environment national anti-money laundering.

No tax guidance has been issued for virtual assets in Ethiopia.

The Ethiopian tax framework does not provide specific rules for cryptocurrency or digital asset transactions, including income tax, capital gains tax, or value-added tax treatment Ethiopia.

The national AML/CFT policy document does not address tax compliance for virtual assets, as the policy is focused on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing objectives national anti-money laundering.

Tax treatment of crypto and digital assets would need to be determined by general tax principles, but no official interpretation has been issued by Ethiopian tax authorities Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Ethiopia lacks a dedicated regulatory framework for virtual assets and virtual asset service providers, creating a significant gap in its AML/CFT system relative to FATF standards Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The absence of licensing requirements for crypto exchanges and digital asset businesses means there is no mechanism for supervision, examination, or enforcement in this sector national anti-money laundering.

Businesses operating in the digital asset space in Ethiopia face legal uncertainty and potential exposure to criminal liability under general financial laws, since crypto activity is neither explicitly legalized nor licensed Ethiopia.

The National Bank of Ethiopia's position that the Birr is the only legal tender creates fundamental tension with any crypto business model in the country Ethiopia.

Ethiopia's AML/CFT framework has been assessed as having a "generally solid" legal basis, but implementation effectiveness remains weak, with the country in enhanced follow-up status Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The 2015 mutual evaluation identified deficiencies in risk assessment (Recommendation 1 rated non-compliant) and national coordination (Recommendation 2 rated partially compliant), indicating structural gaps in the AML/CFT system Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

There is no evidence that Ethiopia has adopted the FATF's Virtual Assets Guidance or implemented measures to regulate VASPs, which represent a material gap in the country's AML/CFT framework Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

The practical reality for businesses is that crypto operations in Ethiopia are likely to face either informal prohibition or risk of regulatory action, but without a clear legal pathway for compliance, investors face substantial risk Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

The Financial Intelligence Service's policy document focuses on traditional financial institutions and does not address the unique risks posed by digital assets or decentralized finance national anti-money laundering.

Until Ethiopia enacts specific legislation for virtual assets and establishes a licensing and supervision regime, the regulatory environment for crypto businesses will remain fundamentally incomplete, with the country at risk of non-compliance with evolving FATF standards on virtual assets Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.

Ethiopia's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing

Follow-Up Report to Ethiopia's assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures

Licensing Compliance: Ensure submission of detailed AML/CFT policies in line with the FSA's January 2024 License Application Guidelines.

KYC Implementation: Conduct customer due diligence within 30 days as per February 2024 AML/CFT Guidelines, utilizing technology to streamline processes.

Monitoring and Reporting: Establish systems for ongoing transaction monitoring and report any suspicious activities under Article 3 of Income Tax Proclamation No. 957/2012.

Penalty Avoidance: Regularly review compliance programs to prevent fines such as the ETB 5 million imposed in March 2024.

Technology Adoption: Despite guidance from Shufti Pro's 2024 Technology Adoption Report indicating that 45% of Ethiopian financial institutions still rely on manual KYC processes.

Compliance Training: Ongoing training for compliance officers is essential to address evolving money laundering techniques and regulatory updates beyond 2024.

Licensing Compliance: Ensure submission of detailed AML/CFT policies in line with the FSA's January 2024 License Application Guidelines.

KYC Implementation: Conduct customer due diligence within 30 days as per February 2024 AML/CFT Guidelines, utilizing technology to streamline processes.

Monitoring and Reporting: Establish systems for ongoing transaction monitoring and report any suspicious activities under Article 3 of Income Tax Proclamation No. 957/2012.

Penalty Avoidance: Regularly review compliance programs to prevent fines such as the ETB 5 million imposed in March 2024.

Ethiopia Strengthens AML-CFT Framework Under FATF... | LinkedIn

Ethiopia AML & Sanctions Compliance · ANQA Compliance

Registration, Licensing, and Inspection of Private Recruitment Agencies for Uganda, Kenya, and Ethiopia

AML Compliance in Ethiopia: A Guide for Fintechs and Regulated...

KYC and AML Compliance in Ethiopia 2025.

(PDF) Diffusion of International Anti-Money Laundering Standards into Ethiopian Laws: Issues of Adequacy and Effectiveness

Stablecoin AML Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of the EU MiCA Framework and U.S. Regulatory Approaches to Financial Crime Prevention

KYC & AML Compliance Ethiopia | Shufti

Registration, Licensing, and Inspection of Private Recruitment Agencies for Uganda, Kenya, and Ethiopia

AML Compliance in Ethiopia: A Guide for Fintechs and Regulated...

KYC and AML Compliance in Ethiopia 2025.

Ethiopia AML & Sanctions Compliance · ANQA Compliance

Income Tax Proclamation No. 957/2012, Article 3

KYC & AML Compliance Ethiopia | Shufti

Ethiopia Strengthens AML-CFT Framework Under FATF... | LinkedIn

(PDF) Diffusion of International Anti-Money Laundering Standards into Ethiopian Laws: Issues of Adequacy and Effectiveness

Stablecoin AML Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of the EU MiCA Framework and U.S. Regulatory Approaches to Financial Crime Prevention

Not Legal Tender: Cryptocurrencies are explicitly not recognized as legal tender in Ethiopia.

NBE Public Notice on Virtual Currencies (June 11, 2022): The NBE issued a stern warning to the public against the use, trading, or mining of cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrencies are deemed illegal for transactions within Ethiopia.

The NBE highlights concerns regarding money laundering, terrorism financing, lack of consumer protection, and volatility.

It explicitly states that "any transaction carried out using such parallel markets (cryptocurrencies) is illegal."

It warns of "legal measures" against those involved in such activities.

National Bank of Ethiopia Public Notice on Virtual Currencies (June 11, 2022). While an official government portal for this specific notice isn't consistently available in English, it was widely reported by NBE's official channels and media:

Example News Source Reporting NBE's Statement: https://www.fanabc.com/english/nbe-warns-public-against-using-cryptocurrencies/ (Fanabc.com is an Ethiopian state media outlet)

Payment Systems Proclamation No. 1282/2022: This proclamation defines "payment instrument" as "any instrument or means, whether tangible or intangible, enabling the transfer of monetary value." It also defines "payment system" and "payment service." Crucially, it does not include virtual assets or cryptocurrencies among the recognized or permitted payment instruments or systems. This legislative framework solidifies the NBE's stance against crypto use for payments.

Payment Systems Proclamation No. 1282/2022. (Official text might require access to Ethiopian legal gazettes; typically available through the NBE or Ministry of Justice but not always publicly online in English readily).

The NBE's directives and public notices make it clear that the use, trading, or mining of cryptocurrencies within Ethiopia for transactional purposes is prohibited. This constitutes a de facto geographic restriction across the entire country.

Ethiopia does not maintain specific national sanctions lists related to cryptocurrency. The primary approach is a blanket prohibition on crypto activities. However, individuals or entities engaged in prohibited crypto activities could fall under general Ethiopian laws related to money laundering, illicit financial flows, or foreign exchange violations.

OFAC (U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control):

Scope: OFAC sanctions apply to U.S. persons (citizens, residents, entities, and their foreign branches), entities operating in the U.S., and sometimes foreign entities facilitating significant transactions with sanctioned persons or countries.

Sanctioned Entity Screening: VASPs must screen all customers and counterparties (originators and beneficiaries) against OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List and other relevant sanctions lists (e.g., Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List, Non-SDN Palestinian Legislative Council List).

Obligation: Block assets and prohibit transactions with individuals or entities on these lists.

Relevance to Ethiopia: If an Ethiopian individual or entity is designated by OFAC for reasons unrelated to crypto (e.g., human rights abuses, terrorism, or other illicit activities), a VASP under U.S. jurisdiction cannot engage in crypto transactions with them.

Geographic Restrictions: OFAC imposes comprehensive sanctions on certain countries (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria). VASPs cannot facilitate crypto transactions that directly or indirectly involve these jurisdictions. This means an Ethiopian VASP customer could not, for instance, send crypto to a recipient in Iran if the VASP is under OFAC jurisdiction.

Risk-Based Approach: Implement a robust sanctions compliance program tailored to their specific risks.

Know Your Customer (KYC) / Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Identify and verify the identity of customers, beneficial owners, and politically exposed persons (PEPs).

Transaction Monitoring: Monitor transactions for suspicious patterns, unusual volumes, or links to sanctioned jurisdictions/entities.

Sanctions Screening: Screen all parties to a transaction (including wallet addresses if possible and identifiable) against relevant sanctions lists.

Record-Keeping: Maintain records of due diligence and transactions.

Reporting: Report blocked property and rejected transactions to OFAC. Report suspicious activity to FinCEN (e.g., SARs).

OFAC Sanctions Programs and Information: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/office-of-foreign-assets-control-sanctions-programs-and-information

OFAC Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry (2021): https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/ofac_virtual_currency_guidance_20211015.pdf

Scope: EU sanctions apply to all persons and entities within the EU, EU nationals, and companies incorporated or constituted under the law of an EU Member State (including their branches abroad).

Sanctioned Entity Screening: VASPs under EU jurisdiction must screen against the EU Consolidated List of persons, groups, and entities subject to EU financial sanctions.

Obligation: Freeze assets and prohibit making funds or economic resources available to designated persons/entities.

Geographic Restrictions: The EU maintains sanctions regimes against various countries. VASPs must ensure they do not facilitate crypto transactions that violate these regimes.

VASP Compliance Requirements: Similar to OFAC, including KYC/CDD, transaction monitoring, screening, freezing assets, and reporting to competent authorities. The EU's Anti-Money Laundering Directives (AMLDs) specifically brought VASPs under AML/CFT obligations.

EU Financial Sanctions Map (Consolidated List): https://www.sanctionsmap.eu/#/main

EU Anti-Money Laundering (AMLDs) directives (e.g., 5th AMLD): Official Journal of the EU. For general information: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/financial-supervision-and-risk-management/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism_en

Scope: UN Security Council Resolutions create obligations for all UN member states (including Ethiopia, the U.S., and EU member states) to implement sanctions domestically.

Sanctioned Entity Screening: VASPs should screen against UN sanctions lists, particularly those related to terrorism (e.g., Al-Qaeda and ISIL sanctions lists) and proliferation (DPRK, Iran).

Obligation: Implement asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes as mandated by the UN Security Council.

VASP Compliance Requirements: Member states transpose UN sanctions into national law. VASPs must comply with their national implementation of UN sanctions, which typically mirrors the requirements for OFAC and EU sanctions (KYC, screening, monitoring, reporting).

UN Security Council Sanctions Committees: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/information

The NBE's public notice explicitly warns of "legal measures" against individuals or entities involved in illegal cryptocurrency activities. While specific crypto-focused penalty laws might not exist, prosecution would likely fall under existing statutes related to:

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) laws: If crypto activities are deemed to facilitate illicit finance.

Foreign Exchange Control Regulations: If crypto is used to circumvent official currency controls or capital outflow restrictions.

Financial Market Regulations: Operating unauthorized payment systems or financial services.

Penalties could include significant fines, imprisonment, and confiscation of assets.

OFAC: Severe civil monetary penalties (ranging from thousands to millions of dollars per violation) and potential criminal penalties (large fines and imprisonment for individuals). Reputational damage and loss of access to the U.S. financial system are also significant risks.

EU: Penalties vary by Member State but can include significant fines (e.g., up to 10% of annual turnover for companies) and imprisonment for individuals.

UN: Failure to implement UN sanctions at the national level can lead to international criticism and potential further UN action against the non-compliant state. For individuals and entities, national laws implementing UN sanctions carry similar severe penalties as OFAC and EU regimes.

Entity Targeted: The general public, financial institutions, and anyone engaging with or promoting cryptocurrencies within Ethiopia. Violation Type: Engaging in transactions with, holding, or promoting cryptocurrencies, as they are not legal tender and are explicitly prohibited. Penalty Amount: Not applicable to a general warning. For individuals, criminal penalties related to illicit financial transactions, foreign exchange violations, or fraud could apply (not specified by NBE in these warnings). Outcome: Cryptocurrencies remain illegal in Ethiopia. The NBE continues to monitor and warn against their use. Financial institutions are prohibited from facilitating crypto transactions.

Outcome: Cryptocurrencies remain illegal in Ethiopia. The NBE continues to monitor and warn against their use. Financial institutions are prohibited from facilitating crypto transactions.