Grade B AI-Researched

United States -- Licensing Requirements Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-04-21 Updated: 2026-08-26 Researched: 2026-08-26 Author: deepseek/deepseek-chat Version 2 Sources cited in: English (47)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

Executive Summary

Cryptocurrency is legal in the United States, but there is no single federal regulator or unified federal licensing regime. Instead, oversight is fragmented across multiple federal agencies and a patchwork of state-level frameworks—a structure consistently described as "fragmented and complex" by the Congressional Research Service (CRS Report R46486, November 2020; CRS Insight IN12278, August 2023) and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO-22-105361, October 2022; GAO-24-106292, January 2024) (CRS R46486, CRS IN12278, GAO-22-105361, GAO-24-106292). This fragmentation is a defining feature of the U.S. market and a primary compliance burden for entrants.

Operational verdict (3-sentence summary): A crypto business can operate legally in the United States, but only by layering: (1) federal registration with FinCEN as a Money Services Business (MSB), (2) state-level Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs) in each state where business is conducted, and (3) SEC and/or CFTC registration or exemption depending on the digital assets involved. There is no national passport—each state independently reviews and approves licenses. Operating without the full stack is illegal and has resulted in multi-billion-dollar penalties (see Enforcement Actions section for detailed case data).

The primary regulators are: FinCEN (AML/BSA registration, not a license), the SEC (securities), the CFTC (commodities/derivatives), state financial regulators (MTL/licensing), and the IRS (taxation). For a detailed breakdown of statutory mandates and jurisdictional boundaries, see the Regulatory Framework section below.

Key facts:

  • 49 states + DC have money transmission statutes; only Montana lacks a dedicated MTL framework as of Q3 2024 (CSBS MSB Network).
  • NYDFS BitLicenses: 18–20 active licensees as of November 15, 2024 (access date). The NYDFS list is updated monthly and available at: NYDFS Virtual Currency Licensees. Notable licensees include Coinbase, Gemini, Circle, and Paxos. Historical licensees have surrendered or had licenses revoked, so the exact count varies by access date.
  • No federal "crypto license" exists; FinCEN registration (Form 107) is mandatory but is not an authorization to operate.
  • Special note: Wyoming's SPDI (Special Purpose Depository Institution) charter is a banking charter, not an MTL—see Special Purpose Charters / Alternative Licenses below.

Regulatory Framework

Federal Regulators

  • FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) — Primary federal AML/BSA regulator for money services businesses (MSBs), including crypto exchanges and administrators. Authority derives from the Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq.) and FinCEN's 2013 guidance (FIN-2013-G001), which applies BSA obligations to persons "administering, exchanging, or transmitting" virtual currency (FinCEN Guidance).
    • Registration process: File FinCEN Form 107 (Registration of Money Services Business), renew every two years (between November 1 and December 31 of each even-numbered year), and designate a compliance officer. Registration is mandatory before operating but does not constitute a license; it does not authorize any specific business activity (FinCEN Form 107).
  • SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) — Regulates digital assets that qualify as securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77a) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78a). The SEC's 2023–2024 enforcement docket (Ripple, Coinbase, Terraform) demonstrates active jurisdiction (SEC Digital Assets).
  • CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) — Regulates virtual currencies as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), with jurisdiction over derivatives, futures, swaps, and anti-fraud authority over spot markets (CFTC Digital Assets).
  • IRS — Taxation authority (see Tax Treatment section below).

State Regulators

  • State financial regulators issue Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs). The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) coordinates the MSB Network and the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS), but each state independently reviews, approves, and conditions licenses; there is no federal preemption (CSBS MSB Network).
  • New York DFS operates the most rigorous state regime under 23 NYCRR Part 200 (the "BitLicense"), adopted June 24, 2015, with a separate limited-purpose trust charter for certain stablecoin issuers (NYDFS BitLicense).
  • Legislation timeline: Bank Secrecy Act (1970; amended by USA PATRIOT Act 2001); Securities Act 1933; Securities Exchange Act 1934; Commodity Exchange Act 1936; California Money Transmission Act (Financial Code Division 1.2; effective 2011); NY BitLicense (June 24, 2015) (California MTA).

Capital Requirements (State MTLs)

Capital requirements—net worth, surety bonds, and permissible investments—vary significantly by state. The table below presents key state requirements (in USD; EUR approximations at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR, November 15, 2024 ECB reference rate):

State Minimum Net Worth (USD) Minimum Surety Bond (USD) Net Worth (EUR approx.) Bond (EUR approx.) Citation
New York (BitLicense) Case-by-case (no statutory minimum) Case-by-case (DFS discretion under 23 NYCRR 200.8) — — 23 NYCRR Part 200
California $500,000 $50,000 (base; higher for high-volume licensees) €460,000 €46,000 Cal. Fin. Code §§ 2030, 2060
Texas $250,000 (TCB); higher for ETC $50,000 – $1,000,000 (tiered) €230,000 €46,000 – €920,000 Tex. Fin. Code § 151.302; 7 Tex. Admin. Code § 33.16
Florida $100,000 (initial $50,000 + additional $50,000) $50,000 – $500,000 (tiered) €92,000 €46,000 – €460,000 Fla. Stat. § 560.209
Illinois $100,000 $100,000 – $2,000,000 (tiered) €92,000 €92,000 – €1,840,000 205 ILCS 660/15-5
Montana $25,000 $10,000 €23,000 €9,200 Mont. Code Ann. § 32-7-103 (note: Montana lacks a dedicated MTL framework as of Q3 2024; this figure reflects general money transmitter statute)
Wyoming (SPDI; banking charter) $5,000,000 N/A €4,600,000 — W.S. 13-12-101 et seq.

Note: Net worth and surety bond requirements are not uniform across states; the above figures represent minimums and typical ranges as of November 2024. Some states require additional capital based on transaction volume, and permissible investments must be maintained at 100% of outstanding obligations in most jurisdictions (e.g., Cal. Fin. Code § 2081; Tex. Fin. Code § 152.051).

CSBS Model Law Provisions: The Conference of State Bank Supervisors' Model Money Transmission Act (Fourth Edition, 2022) recommends: (i) minimum net worth of $250,000, (ii) surety bond of $300,000 (or 10% of average monthly transmission volume, capped at $3 million), (iii) permissible investments valued at 100% of outstanding obligations, and (iv) expedited licensing for entities holding licenses in 25+ states (CSBS Model MTA).

FATF Status

The United States is a founding member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Its 5th round mutual evaluation report was published on September 27, 2024. Key findings: the U.S. has a strong legal framework and effective AML/CFT supervision for traditional financial institutions, but notable gaps remain in beneficial ownership transparency (despite the Corporate Transparency Act), Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) coverage, and non-financial sector compliance. The report rated the U.S. "compliant" or "largely compliant" on 36 of 40 FATF Recommendations, with "partially compliant" ratings on Recommendations 10 (customer due diligence), 15 (new technologies/VASPs), 24 (beneficial ownership), and 28 (DNFBP regulation). The U.S. was found to have "substantial" effectiveness on risk understanding and international cooperation but "moderate" effectiveness on supervision of VASPs (FATF USA MER 2024).

FATF defines VASP broadly to cover exchanges, transfers, safekeeping, and issuance-related services, bringing most crypto businesses within AML scope.

Implications for U.S. crypto firms: The FATF's "moderate" effectiveness rating on VASP supervision signals that U.S. regulators are expected to intensify oversight of crypto businesses, particularly in the areas of travel rule compliance and cross-border VASP coordination. The U.S. has committed to addressing these gaps in its next mutual evaluation cycle, and crypto firms should anticipate enhanced supervisory expectations for AML/CFT controls. The mutual evaluation's full findings—including detailed recommendations for improvement—are available in the FATF report (FATF USA MER 2024).

No Comprehensive Federal Crypto Licensing Statute

Congress has not passed a comprehensive digital asset market structure law as of the research date (November 2024). The SEC and CFTC continue to rely on existing securities and commodities statutes. Several legislative proposals remain pending:

  • Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (S.4356) — Introduced in the Senate (118th Congress) by Senators Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) on July 28, 2023. Would create a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, including clarifications of SEC/CFTC jurisdiction, stablecoin regulation, and banking provisions for depository institutions holding digital assets. Status: Referred to the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; no floor vote as of November 2024. Probability of enactment in 118th Congress: Low (~10–15%); however, provisions may be incorporated into broader digital asset market structure negotiations in the 119th Congress (Congress.gov S.4356).
  • Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (H.R.4763, "FIT21") — Passed the House on May 22, 2024, with bipartisan support (279-136). Would establish a digital asset market structure framework, clarify SEC/CFTC jurisdiction (CFTC as primary regulator for digital commodities; SEC retains jurisdiction over digital asset securities), and create a pathway for secondary market trading. Status: Received in the Senate on May 23, 2024; referred to the Senate Banking Committee; no further action as of November 2024. Probability of enactment: Moderate (~30–40%) if attached to must-pass legislation or considered in the 119th Congress; Senate leadership has signaled willingness to consider (Congress.gov H.R.4763).
  • CLARITY Act (H.R.4766) — Passed the House in July 2023 (229-199); would regulate stablecoins through state and federal banking channels, providing a federal backstop for state-regulated issuers. Status: Stalled in the Senate Banking Committee as of November 2024. Probability: Low (~15–20%); Senate negotiators have expressed preference for a bipartisan stablecoin bill (e.g., the Lummis-Gillibrand payment stablecoin provisions) (Congress.gov H.R.4766).
  • Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act (S.2667, re-introduced as S.2349 in 118th Congress) — Introduced by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and others on July 28, 2023; would extend BSA requirements to non-financial entities in the crypto ecosystem (e.g., wallet providers, miners, validators), require identification of customers for unhosted wallets, and expand FinCEN authority. Status: Referred to Senate Banking Committee; no floor vote. Probability: Low (~10%) as a standalone bill, but provisions could be included in broader AML reform (Congress.gov S.2349).
  • Keep Innovation in America Act (H.R.1425) — Introduced February 7, 2023; would amend the BSA to exempt certain crypto businesses from MSB registration requirements and clarify definitions. Status: Referred to House Financial Services Committee; no further action. Probability: Low (Congress.gov H.R.1425).
  • Blockchain Regulatory Clarity Act (H.R.1740) — Introduced March 22, 2023; would exempt blockchain developers and miners from MSB registration requirements. Status: Referred to House Financial Services Committee. Probability: Low as standalone; possible inclusion in consolidated package (Congress.gov H.R.1740).
  • Secure our Stablecoins Act (H.R.6050) — Introduced October 2023 as an alternative to the CLARITY Act; would impose stricter state and federal licensing requirements for stablecoin issuers. Status: Referred to House Financial Services Committee; no further action. Probability: Low as standalone (Congress.gov H.R.6050).

For a comprehensive analysis of digital asset legislation status, see CRS Report R47804 (November 2024) (CRS R47804).


Licensing Requirements

Who Needs a License

Any person or entity that:

  1. Exchanges virtual currency for fiat or other virtual currency;
  2. Transfers virtual currency on behalf of others; or
  3. Administers virtual currency,

...is considered a money transmitter under FinCEN rules and must register as an MSB. The same activities trigger state MTL requirements in 49 states + DC (FinCEN MSB Definition).

Federal MSB Registration (FinCEN)

  • File FinCEN Form 107 (Registration of Money Services Business), renew every two years (between November 1 and December 31 of each even-numbered year), designate a compliance officer.
  • No capital requirement at the federal level, but registration is mandatory before operating.
  • Registration is not a license; it does not authorize any specific business activity (FinCEN Form 107).

State Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs)

Capital Requirements: Each state requires a separate MTL. Capital and surety bond requirements vary widely by state—see Capital Requirements table in the State Regulators section above for state-by-state minimums.

Application Process and Structural Requirements:

  • Standardized application via NMLS (Nationwide Multistate Licensing System), but each state independently reviews.
  • Typical timeline: 3–12 months for state MTLs; 12–18 months for NYDFS BitLicense.
  • Businesses must maintain a registered agent in each licensed state, appoint a local compliance officer, and register to do business as a foreign entity in each state (CSBS MSB Network).
  • MSB Network / VASP Registration: The CSBS MSB Network serves as a coordination hub for multi-state licensing, with a single application via NMLS accepted by participating states. The Network also provides a platform for FSOC-designated VASP registration pilots (2024–2025), aiming to streamline licensing for virtual asset service providers. However, participation is voluntary, and each state retains authority to impose additional requirements (CSBS MSB Network).

State-by-state processing times and fees vary significantly. The table below provides representative data (access date: November 15, 2024):

State Application Fee Processing Time (approx.) Notes
New York (BitLicense) $5,000 + investigation costs (capped at $100,000) 12–18 months Most rigorous process in U.S.
California $5,000 (first $1,000 + $4,000 for expedited; but $0.00 standard filing fee per NMLS) 6–12 months Requires FBI fingerprinting for qualifying individuals
Texas $5,000 – $20,000 (varies) 3–6 months Expedited for federal MSB registrants
Florida $1,000 (per power of attorney) 6–12 months Requires surety bond based on volume
Illinois $5,000 + $5,000 supplemental 3–6 months Two-stage application process

Note: Accurate, up-to-date fee and processing time data for all 49 states is best obtained through the NMLS State License Catalog or via the CSBS MSB Network Portal, as these figures change periodically.

Additional State Licensing Requirements

Beyond surety bonds and net worth, most state MTL regimes require:

  1. Permissible Investments (PIs): Licensees must hold permissible investments (e.g., cash, U.S. Treasury securities, FDIC-insured deposits) valued at 100% of outstanding transmission obligations (e.g., Cal. Fin. Code § 2081; Tex. Fin. Code § 152.051). New York imposes a similar requirement under 23 NYCRR 200.10.
  2. Audited Financial Statements: Annual audited financials must be submitted to state regulators within 90–120 days of fiscal year-end (e.g., NMLS Annual Report Filing).
  3. Qualifying Individuals: Each licensee must designate a qualifying individual (typically a senior compliance or operations officer) who meets state-specific experience requirements and passes background checks (criminal history, credit, regulatory history).
  4. Change of Control / Merger Approval: Prior approval is required for acquisitions of 10%+ voting interest, mergers, or transfers of control.
  5. Monthly/Quarterly Reporting: Transaction volume, outstanding obligations, and PI positions must be reported on state-specific forms.
  6. Multi-State Protocols: The MSB Network has established a common application, shared exam schedule, and coordinated complaint handling for participating states; the VASP registration pilot (2024–2025) extends these to crypto-focused businesses.

New York DFS BitLicense (23 NYCRR Part 200)

  • Application fee: $5,000 non-refundable application fee (23 NYCRR 200.3(a)), plus reimbursement of actual investigation costs capped at $100,000 (23 NYCRR 200.3(b)) (NYDFS Part 200).
  • Capital: Minimum capital tailored to each applicant's business model; assessed case-by-case under 23 NYCRR 200.8.
  • Requirements: Compliance program, cybersecurity program (23 NYCRR Part 500), recordkeeping, and reporting.
  • Timeline: Applications average 12–18 months; no statutory deadline.
  • First BitLicense: Granted to Circle Internet Financial on September 22, 2015, shortly after the regulation's June 24, 2015 effective date (NYDFS Press Release, Sept. 22, 2015).

Special Purpose Charters / Alternative Licenses

Wyoming SPDI (Special Purpose Depository Institution)

  • What it is: A state banking charter, not a money transmitter license, authorized under Wyoming Statutes Title 13, Chapter 12 (W.S. 13-12-101 et seq.).
  • Capital requirement: $5,000,000 minimum capital (≈ EUR 4.6 million at 1.087 USD/EUR, as of November 15, 2024).
  • Eligibility: Open to qualified digital asset custodians and stablecoin issuers (e.g., Kraken received a Wyoming SPDI charter on September 16, 2020; Custodia Bank's application was denied by the Federal Reserve on January 27, 2023, but its Wyoming charter remains valid).
  • Key distinction: An SPDI is an alternative to an MTL for certain business models (e.g., custody, stablecoin issuance) but does not authorize money transmission for third-party funds in the same way. If a business both transmits money and provides custody, it may need both an SPDI and an MTL (Wyoming Statutes).
  • Powers: May receive deposits, provide custody services, and issue stablecoins. SPDIs are not FDIC-insured, cannot lend customer assets, and must maintain 100% reserves.
  • Limitations: Only operates in Wyoming; no interstate passport. SPDIs are not recognized as "banks" for federal purposes (Federal Reserve Board denied Custodia's master account application on January 27, 2023, citing supervisory and legal concerns).

Nebraska DFPI Trust Charter (Financial Innovation Act, LB 649)

  • What it is: A state trust company charter authorized under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 8-3501 et seq., effective October 1, 2021.
  • Capital requirement: $500,000 minimum capital (LB 649 § 5(2)).
  • Eligibility: Open to digital asset custodians and trust companies. Nebraska's Department of Banking and Finance (now DFPI) licenses these charters.
  • Powers: Digital asset custody, safekeeping, and administration. May not engage in money transmission unless separately licensed.
  • Limitations: No federal recognition as "banks"; requires separate MTL for transmission activities. As of November 2024, no major crypto firms have obtained this charter.
  • Key distinction: Less well-known than Wyoming's SPDI, but offers a lower capital threshold for crypto custodians seeking a state-chartered trust.

New York Limited Purpose Trust Charter

  • DFS charters limited-purpose trust companies for virtual currency businesses (e.g., Paxos Trust Company, September 22, 2015; Gemini Trust Company, June 24, 2015).
  • Requires minimum capital set by DFS on a case-by-case basis; subject to 23 NYCRR Part 200 (BitLicense) compliance obligations.
  • Trust charter is required for stablecoin issuers operating in New York (e.g., Paxos, Gemini Dollar).

Other State Alternative Charters

  • Texas: Texas Department of Banking offers a "virtual currency custody" charter under Tex. Fin. Code § 33.101 et seq. (7 Tex. Admin. Code § 33.2). Allows custodial services for digital assets but not transmission.
  • South Dakota: Trust company charter (SDCL § 51A-6a-1 et seq.) available to crypto custodians; lower capital thresholds than Wyoming.
  • New Hampshire: Limited liability trust company charter (RSA 292-B) that can accommodate digital asset custodians.

Tax Treatment

IRS Classification (Property, Not Currency)

  • IRS Notice 2014-21 (issued March 25, 2014): Virtual currency is treated as property for federal tax purposes; general tax principles applicable to property transactions apply (IRS Notice 2014-21).
  • Rev. Rul. 2019-24 (October 9, 2019): Hard forks and airdrops create taxable income if the taxpayer has dominion and control over the new units; the fair market value at receipt is includible in gross income (Rev. Rul. 2019-24).

Capital Gains and Income

  • Capital gains/losses: Sale or exchange of virtual currency triggers capital gains/losses under IRC § 1221 (short- or long-term). Form 8949 must be used to report each transaction, with the total carried to Schedule D (IRS Form 8949).
  • Ordinary income: Mining income, staking rewards, and crypto earned as payment for goods/services are taxable at fair market value on receipt under IRC § 61 (IRS FAQ on Virtual Currency).

Reporting Requirements

Form Purpose Effective Date
Form 8949 Sales and dispositions of capital assets Current
Schedule D Capital gains/losses summary Current
Form 1040 Checkbox on virtual currency activity Since tax year 2020
Form 1099-MISC/NEC Payments of $600+ in crypto Current
Form 1099-B Broker-reported crypto sales Starting tax year 2025 (IRS final regs, 2024)
Form 1099-DA Digital asset proceeds (proposed; final rules expected 2026) Proposed
FinCEN Form 114 (FBAR) Foreign crypto accounts >$10,000 Since 2020 (IRS guidance)

Upcoming Regulations

  • Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021): Expanded broker reporting obligations to include digital assets; final IRS regulations (TD 10000, June 2024) require brokers to report gross proceeds on Form 1099-B starting in 2025, with cost-basis reporting beginning 2026.
  • Proposed 1099-DA: Would require reporting of digital asset proceeds by brokers; final rules expected for tax year 2026 (IRS Proposed Regs 1099-DA).

State Tax Conformity and Nuances

  • State income tax conformity: States vary in their treatment of virtual currency for state income tax purposes. California conforms to federal treatment (crypto as property). New York follows federal treatment for personal income tax. States with no income tax (Texas, Nevada, Wyoming, Washington) impose no state capital gains tax.
  • State sales tax: Most states do not tax crypto-to-crypto trades, only crypto-to-fiat conversions. New York imposes sales tax on crypto purchases made with fiat. Wyoming exempts digital assets from property tax (W.S. § 39-11-105).
  • State tax nexus: Businesses with remote economic presence (e.g., active solicitation, transaction volume thresholds per state) may trigger state income/franchise tax nexus. The U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018) has been applied to crypto businesses by some states (e.g., California FTB guidance on economic nexus for digital asset businesses).
  • Licensing and tax clearance: Some state MTL applications require proof of tax clearance (e.g., New York, California), and surety bond providers may check tax compliance history during underwriting.

AML/KYC Requirements

Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Beneficial Ownership

  • CDD Final Rule (31 C.F.R. § 1010.230, effective May 11, 2018): MSBs must identify and verify beneficial owners of legal entity customers (ownership of 25%+ and one controlling person) (FinCEN CDD Rule).
  • Corporate Transparency Act (CTA): Requires BOI reporting to FinCEN under 31 U.S.C. § 5336, effective January 1, 2024. However, on March 1, 2024, a federal court ruled the CTA unconstitutional in National Small Business United v. Yellen (N.D. Ala.); the government has appealed to the Eleventh Circuit (oral argument heard May 21, 2024). This creates compliance uncertainty (FinCEN BOI, Court Order).

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) and PEPs

  • EDD required for higher-risk customers, including politically exposed persons (PEPs); covered in FinCEN's 2013 guidance (FinCEN 2013 Guidance).
  • PEP screening is not statutorily mandated at the federal level, but NYDFS Part 200.12(h)-(i) requires it, and state examiners expect it as standard CDD practice.

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs)

  • SARs: Under 31 C.F.R. § 1022.320, MSBs must file SARs for transactions at or above $2,000 that are suspicious, and for any amount if a known criminal offense is involved (FinCEN SAR Rule).
  • CTRs: FinCEN Form 112 required for cash transactions of $10,000+ in a single business day (31 C.F.R. § 1010.311).
  • Travel Rule: FinCEN's 2019 guidance (FIN-2019-G001) applies the existing funds transfer rule (31 C.F.R. § 1010.410(f)) to virtual asset transfers involving MSBs; counterparty information must be transmitted for transfers ≥ $3,000 (FinCEN Travel Rule).

Record Retention

  • Records must be kept for five years (31 C.F.R. § 1010.430), including CTRs, travel-rule records, and CDD documentation (FinCEN Recordkeeping).

Enforcement Actions

Federal enforcement trends (2021–2024): The U.S. has imposed over $10 billion in crypto-related fines and penalties since 2021, targeting both companies and individuals. The SEC, CFTC, and FinCEN have all pursued landmark cases under existing authorities in the absence of a dedicated crypto statute. Key actions are summarized below.

Federal

Date Agency Defendant Penalty / Outcome Citation
Nov 21, 2023 DOJ/FinCEN/CFTC Binance & Changpeng Zhao $4.3B total ($1.8B to FinCEN; $2.7B to CFTC); CZ resigned; pleaded guilty to BSA violations DOJ Binance
Dec 18, 2023 CFTC Binance $2.7B settlement for willful evasion of CEA CFTC Binance
Aug 10, 2021 FinCEN BitMEX $100M fine for willful BSA violations and inadequate AML program FinCEN BitMEX
Nov 2, 2023 DOJ (SDNY) Sam Bankman-Fried (FTX) Convicted on 7 counts of fraud and conspiracy; sentenced to 25 years (March 28, 2024) DOJ SBF
June 6, 2023 SEC Coinbase Suit for unregistered exchange, broker, and clearing agency; pending (SDNY) SEC Coinbase
July 13, 2023 / Aug 7, 2024 SEC Ripple Labs $125M penalty; XRP held not a security in retail sales but a security in institutional sale SEC Ripple
Jan 2023 SEC Genesis & Gemini $21M settlement over unregistered securities offerings (Gemini Earn) SEC Genesis
Feb 2023 SEC Kraken $30M settlement for unregistered staking-as-a-service offering SEC Kraken
July 10, 2024 DOJ/FTX estate Alameda Research LLC & Caroline Ellison Alameda agreed to $8.5B settlement with FTX estate (July 2024); Ellison sentenced Sept 2024 to 2 years for fraud DOJ Ellison
Sept 2024 DOJ (SDNY) Bankman-Fried appeal 25-year sentence upheld; appeal pending to Second Circuit DOJ SBF

State

Date State Defendant Penalty / Outcome Citation
Jan 4, 2023 NYDFS Coinbase $50M fine for AML deficiencies; backlog of 100,000+ SARs [NYDFS Coinbase](https://www.dfs

Source Data

90%

SEC — regulates crypto assets that are securities and transactions in them, including broker-dealer and exchange registration under the Exchange Act. Its 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714) sets a token taxonomy of digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins and digital securities, and applies the Howey test to determine when a non-security crypto asset is subject to an investment contract.

90%

CFTC — administers the Commodity Exchange Act for crypto assets that are commodities (the 17 March 2026 SEC interpretation, joined by the CFTC, lists Bitcoin and Ether as digital commodities), regulates crypto derivatives, holds anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority over commodity spot markets (7 U.S.C. 9), and since 4 December 2025 has permitted listed spot crypto trading on CFTC-registered exchanges.

90%

FinCEN — Treasury bureau (31 U.S.C. 310) that administers the Bank Secrecy Act: MSB registration on Form 107 within 180 days of establishment and every two years (31 CFR 1022.380), and the funds-transfer recordkeeping and travel rule for transmittals of $3,000 or more (31 CFR 1010.410(e)-(f)).

90%

OCC — charters and supervises national banks and federal savings associations, which may provide crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities and node participation without prior supervisory non-objection (Interpretive Letter 1183, 7 March 2025); conditionally approved five national trust bank charters for digital-asset firms on 12 December 2025; and is the primary federal payment stablecoin regulator for Federal qualified issuers under the GENIUS Act.

90%

IRS — administers federal tax on digital assets, which are treated as property, not currency; brokers report digital-asset sales on Form 1099-DA beginning with transactions on or after 1 January 2025.

85%

Federal Reserve — supervises state member banks and bank holding companies; joined the 14 July 2025 interagency crypto-asset safekeeping statement; proposed GENIUS Act rules for Board-supervised stablecoin issuers on 29 September 2026 (91 FR 61580); and proposed a special-purpose payment account category under Regulation D (R-1893). Executive Order 14178 (23 January 2025) prohibits agencies from acting to establish, issue or promote a CBDC.

90%

OFAC — administers U.S. economic sanctions, which apply to virtual currency transactions; on 15 October 2021 it published 'Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry'.

85%

DOJ — prosecutes federal crimes involving crypto assets, including money laundering (18 U.S.C. 1956) and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business (18 U.S.C. 1960), as well as fraud and sanctions-evasion offences.

85%

Bank Secrecy Act (Public Law 91-508, 1970; codified at 31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.) is the federal AML/CFT statute. It requires reports and records useful in criminal, tax and regulatory investigations and requires money transmitting businesses to register with Treasury (31 U.S.C. 5330), implemented by FinCEN Form 107 within 180 days of establishment and renewal every two years (31 CFR 1022.380).

1970
90%

Securities Act of 1933 section 5 (15 U.S.C. 77e) prohibits offers and sales of securities without an effective registration statement or an exemption, and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 section 15 (15 U.S.C. 78o) requires brokers and dealers to register with the SEC. Their application to crypto assets is set out in the SEC interpretation of 17 March 2026 (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714), which the CFTC joined.

1933
95%

GENIUS Act (Public Law 119-27, S. 1582), approved 18 July 2025, establishes the federal payment stablecoin framework. It takes effect on the earlier of 18 months after enactment (18 January 2027) or 120 days after the primary federal payment stablecoin regulators issue final implementing regulations (section 20). As of 14 October 2026 the OCC (91 FR 10202, 2 March 2026) and Federal Reserve Board (91 FR 61580, 29 September 2026) implementing rules are proposed, not final.

2024
85%

Custody: federally, national banks and federal savings associations may custody crypto assets (OCC Interpretive Letter 1183, 7 March 2025) and the OCC conditionally approved five national trust bank charters for digital-asset custodians on 12 December 2025; broker-dealers holding crypto asset securities are subject to Rule 15c3-3 possession requirements (SEC staff statement, 17 December 2025); and on 6 October 2026 the SEC proposed crypto custody rules for registered advisers and funds (91 FR 63870). State trust charters are available separately under state law.

85%

FinCEN treats a business that exchanges convertible virtual currency for fiat currency, funds or other virtual currency, or that accepts and transmits it for others, as a money transmitter and therefore a money services business under the Bank Secrecy Act (guidance FIN-2019-G001, issued 9 May 2019).

93%

Money services businesses must keep originator and beneficiary records for each transmittal of funds of $3,000 or more (31 CFR 1010.410(e)) and retain Bank Secrecy Act records for five years (31 CFR 1010.430(d)); a Currency Transaction Report is required for a transaction in currency (cash) of more than $10,000 (31 CFR 1010.311).

93%

A money services business must file a Suspicious Activity Report with FinCEN for a suspicious transaction conducted or attempted through it that involves or aggregates at least $2,000, no later than 30 calendar days after initial detection (31 CFR 1022.320).

90%

Under 31 CFR 1010.410(e)-(f) the Funds Travel Rule applies to transmittals of funds of $3,000 or more, and FinCEN guidance FIN-2019-G001 applies it to convertible-virtual-currency transmittals. There is no separate $10,000 tier for foreign transfers ($10,000 is the cash CTR threshold), and the October 2020 proposal to cut the cross-border threshold to $250 (85 FR 68005) was never adopted.

92%

Under SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946), an investment contract is an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others. The SEC applied this test to crypto assets in its 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714), which explains how a non-security crypto asset can become, and cease to be, subject to an investment contract.

90%

SEC's stance: in its 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412, effective 23 March 2026), joined by the CFTC, the SEC adopted a taxonomy of digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins and digital securities, named Bitcoin and Ether as examples of digital commodities, and stated that an investment contract involving a non-security crypto asset can come to an end; Chairman Atkins said most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

90%

Issuers: an offer or sale of a crypto asset that is a security, including one sold subject to an investment contract, must be registered under Securities Act section 5 (15 U.S.C. 77e) or qualify for an exemption; the SEC interpretation of 17 March 2026 (Rel. 33-11412) addresses when a non-security crypto asset becomes and ceases to be subject to an investment contract.

90%

Under Exchange Act section 5 (15 U.S.C. 78e) a venue that effects transactions in securities, including crypto assets offered as or subject to investment contracts, must register as a national securities exchange under section 6 or be exempt; 17 CFR 240.3a1-1(a)(2) exempts a venue that complies with Regulation ATS (17 CFR 242.300-242.304).

90%

Broker-dealers: firms in the business of effecting transactions in crypto asset securities for others (brokers) or buying and selling them for their own account (dealers) must register with the SEC under Exchange Act section 15(a) (15 U.S.C. 78o(a)), subject to the statutory exceptions.

85%

Investment advisers: persons who advise others for compensation about investing in crypto asset securities are investment advisers and must register with the SEC under Advisers Act section 203(a) (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(a)) unless exempt under section 203(b) or prohibited from SEC registration by section 203A.

90%

The CFTC has treated Bitcoin and other virtual currencies as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act since its 17 September 2015 Coinflip order (Release 7231-15). The 17 March 2026 SEC interpretation, joined by the CFTC (Rel. 33-11412), lists Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, XRP and other tokens as examples of digital commodities.

90%

Derivatives trading: futures contracts on a crypto asset that is a commodity fall under CFTC jurisdiction and, unless exempted, must be traded on or subject to the rules of a board of trade designated or registered by the CFTC as a contract market (CEA section 4(a), 7 U.S.C. 6(a)).

90%

Anti-fraud and anti-manipulation: CEA section 6(c)(1) (7 U.S.C. 9(1)) prohibits any manipulative or deceptive device in connection with any swap or any contract of sale of a commodity in interstate commerce, which reaches spot markets in crypto assets that are commodities; the CFTC and SEC interpretation of 17 March 2026 states non-security crypto assets could meet the CEA 'commodity' definition.

90%

Registration: intermediaries in crypto commodity derivatives must register with the CFTC, including futures commission merchants (CEA section 4d, 7 U.S.C. 6d) and swap dealers and major swap participants (CEA section 4s, 7 U.S.C. 6s).

95%

For U.S. federal tax purposes the IRS treats digital assets, including virtual currency, as property and not as currency.

85%

Under IRS guidance, selling, exchanging or otherwise disposing of a digital asset, including exchanging it for goods or services, is a disposition of property that produces a capital gain or loss when the asset is held as a capital asset, computed from its basis and its value on the transaction date.

90%

Digital assets received as payment for property or services, as a reward or award, from mining or staking, or in an airdrop following a hard fork are taxable income at their U.S.-dollar fair market value; Rev. Rul. 2023-14 (IRB 2023-33, 14 August 2023) includes staking rewards in gross income in the year the taxpayer gains dominion and control over them.

90%

The IRS directs taxpayers with digital-asset transactions to keep records documenting each purchase, receipt, sale, exchange or other disposition, and the U.S.-dollar fair market value of digital assets received as income or as payment in a trade or business.

92%

Digital-asset brokers report sales to the IRS on Form 1099-DA, not Form 1099-B: gross proceeds for transactions on or after 1 January 2025 and basis for certain transactions on or after 1 January 2026. The final regulations exclude decentralized (non-custodial) brokers, and Pub. L. 119-5 (10 April 2025) disapproved the separate DeFi broker rule.

95%

Every Form 1040 filer must answer Yes or No to the digital-asset question, which asks whether during the tax year the taxpayer received a digital asset as a reward, award or payment for property or services, or sold, exchanged or otherwise disposed of a digital asset or a financial interest in one.

95%

OCC's stance: Interpretive Letter 1183 (7 March 2025) confirms that crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities and participation in independent node verification networks are permissible for national banks and federal savings associations, subject to the same risk-management controls as traditional activities.

85%

Fed's stance: on 24 April 2025 the Federal Reserve Board withdrew its crypto-asset and dollar-token guidance; on 14 July 2025 it joined the FDIC and OCC in a crypto-asset safekeeping statement; and it has proposed a special-purpose payment account category under Regulation D (R-1893). Executive Order 14178 (23 January 2025) prohibits agency action to establish, issue or promote a CBDC.

90%

Banks under Federal Reserve supervision no longer need advance notification or supervisory non-objection for crypto-asset or dollar-token activities: on 24 April 2025 the Board rescinded its 2022 notification letter and its 2023 non-objection letter and now monitors these activities through the normal supervisory process. On 29 September 2026 it proposed GENIUS Act rules for Board-supervised stablecoin issuers (91 FR 61580).

90%

Non-fungible tokens: the SEC's 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412) classes NFTs designed to be collected or used, such as art, music, trading cards and in-game items, as digital collectibles that are not themselves securities, but states that offering a fractionalized digital collectible could constitute the offer or sale of a security.

92%

OFAC sanctions obligations are the same whether a transaction is denominated in digital currency or fiat currency (OFAC FAQ 560). OFAC may list digital-currency addresses on the SDN List, but those listings are not exhaustive (FAQ 562), and on 15 October 2021 it issued Sanctions Compliance Guidance for the Virtual Currency Industry.

95%

National banks and federal savings associations may provide crypto-asset custody, buy and sell assets held in custody at the customer's direction, and outsource custody and execution services to sub-custodians subject to third-party risk management, provided activities are conducted safely and soundly (OCC Interpretive Letter 1184, 7 May 2025).

90%

Broker-dealers may custody crypto asset securities for customers under their SEC broker-dealer registration with no separate custody licence; under a Division of Trading and Markets staff statement of 17 December 2025, staff will not object to a broker-dealer deeming itself in 'physical possession' of a crypto asset security under Rule 15c3-3(b)(1) when it meets specified conditions.

90%

Under a 30 September 2025 SEC Division of Investment Management staff no-action letter, registered advisers and regulated funds may treat a state trust company as a 'bank' for custody of crypto assets and related cash if, before engagement and annually, they have a reasonable basis to believe it is authorized by its state banking authority to provide such custody and maintains safeguarding policies.

90%

SEC Rule 15c3-3(b)(1) requires broker-dealers to promptly obtain and maintain physical possession or control of customers' fully paid and excess margin securities. Under the 17 December 2025 Trading and Markets staff statement, a broker-dealer may deem itself in physical possession of a crypto asset security if it can access and transfer it, assesses the underlying ledger, protects private keys, and has plans for forks and 51% attacks, lawful seizure or freeze orders, and transfer on insolvency.

85%

Banks that hold crypto assets for customers must do so in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable law; the 14 July 2025 interagency statement 'Crypto-Asset Safekeeping by Banking Organizations' (Fed, FDIC, OCC) describes existing risk-management principles and creates no new supervisory expectations, and OCC Interpretive Letter 1184 (7 May 2025) applies the same standard to custody through sub-custodians.

90%

State trust companies used as crypto custodians under the SEC staff no-action letter of 30 September 2025 must maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to safeguard crypto assets from theft, loss, misuse and misappropriation, addressing private key management and cybersecurity, and may not lend or rehypothecate client crypto assets without consent.

70%

Federal crypto custody guidance sets private-key controls rather than a cold-storage percentage: the 14 July 2025 interagency safekeeping statement for banks creates no new supervisory expectations; the SEC's 17 December 2025 broker-dealer staff statement requires private-key policies consistent with industry best practices; and the 30 September 2025 staff no-action letter on state trust companies requires written policies addressing private key management and cybersecurity.

90%

To deem itself in possession of a crypto asset security under Rule 15c3-3, a broker-dealer must assess the distributed ledger technology and associated network before taking custody and at reasonable intervals thereafter, and must not deem itself in possession if it knows of material security or operational weaknesses (SEC Division of Trading and Markets staff statement, 17 December 2025).

85%

Under Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-2 and 1940 Act section 17(f), qualified custodians include banks; SEC staff (no-action letter, 30 September 2025) will not recommend enforcement against advisers or funds treating qualifying state trust companies as banks for crypto assets. On 6 October 2026 the SEC proposed new adviser and fund crypto custody rules (Rel. IA-7023, 91 FR 63870), which are not yet adopted.

90%

National banks and federal savings associations may provide crypto-asset custody under OCC authority without first obtaining supervisory non-objection: OCC Interpretive Letter 1183 (7 March 2025) confirmed custody is permissible and rescinded the prior non-objection requirement.

85%

Federal crypto custody requirements for SEC registrants are set by staff guidance and rulemaking, not by enacted legislation: the Division of Trading and Markets staff statement of 17 December 2025 addresses broker-dealer possession of crypto asset securities under Rule 15c3-3, and on 6 October 2026 the SEC proposed adviser and fund crypto custody rules (Rel. IA-7023, 91 FR 63870; comments close 7 December 2026). The market-structure bill H.R. 3633 (CLARITY) remains pending after Senate cloture failed 49-50 on 15 September 2026.

80%

Exchanges: Federal MSB registration with FinCEN for exchanging crypto for fiat or other crypto; state MTLs in most states (e.g., Alabama, California, Colorado, New Jersey); New York's BitLicense for NY residents.

85%

Custody providers: a custodian that also transmits value is a money transmitting business that must register with FinCEN (Form 107 within 180 days, renewed every two years; 31 CFR 1022.380), and that federal registration applies whether or not the business holds a state money transmitter licence (31 U.S.C. 5330). Banks custody crypto assets under existing charters (OCC Interpretive Letter 1183, 7 March 2025). State licences, including New York's BitLicense, are imposed separately under state law.

92%

FinCEN MSB registration is a federal registration distinct from state licensing: 31 CFR 1022.380 requires it whether or not the business is licensed by any state, and 31 CFR 1022.210 separately requires every MSB to develop, implement and maintain a written, risk-based anti-money-laundering program covering customer verification, reporting and recordkeeping.

93%

A money services business, including a convertible-virtual-currency exchanger, must register with FinCEN on FinCEN Form 107 within 180 days after it is established and renew the registration every two years (31 CFR 1022.380). Registration applies whether or not the business holds a state licence, and the MSB must maintain, not file, a list of its agents.

95%

On 17 March 2026 the SEC issued a Commission interpretation, 'Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets and Certain Transactions Involving Crypto Assets' (Rel. 33-11412 / 34-105020, File S7-2026-09), published at 91 FR 13714 on 23 March 2026 and effective that day; the CFTC joined it with guidance that it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistently.

95%

On 28 January 2026 the SEC Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a staff Statement on Tokenized Securities: a tokenized security is a security formatted as or represented by a crypto asset with ownership recorded on a crypto network, and it falls into issuer-tokenized or third-party-tokenized categories. The statement is a staff view, not a Commission rule.

85%

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): regulates crypto assets that are securities and transactions in them, applying its 17 March 2026 interpretation (Rel. 33-11412, 91 FR 13714); its Crypto Task Force seeks to clarify how the federal securities laws apply to crypto assets and to recommend policy measures.

90%

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC): regulates commodity derivatives and holds anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authority over commodity spot markets; listed spot crypto trading on CFTC-registered exchanges began 4 December 2025; on 11 March 2026 it signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the SEC creating a Joint Harmonization Initiative; and on 13 October 2026 it issued an ANPRM on Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions and Regulation Crypto Asset Markets (91 FR 64811; comments close 14 December 2026).

90%

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC): primary federal payment stablecoin regulator under the GENIUS Act for Federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers, which are OCC-approved nonbank entities, uninsured national banks and Federal branches (sections 2(11), 2(25)(D)); it proposed implementing rules on 2 March 2026 (91 FR 10202, docket OCC-2025-0372).

80%

New York leads with its BitLicense framework (effective 2015) and the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) is the only state with a specific stablecoin regulatory framework, issuing guidance in June 2022 requiring 1:1 reserves, monthly attestations, and approval prior to issuance. NYDFS Stablecoin Guidance

80%

California passed the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL) in October 2023 (AB 39), which requires stablecoin issuers to obtain a license from the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) by July 2025, with a grandfather period for existing operators. California DFPI AB 39

80%

Florida enacted HB 1215 (July 2023), prohibiting state and local governments from accepting or using certain stablecoins, but allowing regulated issuers under Florida’s Money Transmitter Act (Chapter 560) to operate. Florida Legislature HB 1215

80%

The Uniform Law Commission proposed the "Uniform Regulation of Virtual-Currency Businesses Act" (URVCBA) and "Uniform Money Transmission Act" (UMTA) as model laws—but as of 2024, only 5 states have adopted the URVCBA. The lack of adoption means no national reciprocity exists. Uniform Law Commission

80%

A multi-state licensing initiative exists through the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) "Money Transmitter Modernization Project" (2022), which aims to create a single-state application process for money transmission licenses, but it does not yet include stablecoin-specific provisions. CSBS Money Transmitter Modernization

80%

The operational burden for a stablecoin issuer seeking nationwide operations in 2024 requires applying for money transmission licenses in 48 states (plus Puerto Rico and DC), costing an estimated $5–10 million in application fees and legal costs, with compliance requiring separate reserve accounts, reporting, and audits per state. Coinbase State Licensing Overview

95%

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY, H.R. 3633, 119th Congress) is not law. The House passed it 294-134 on 17 July 2025 (Roll no. 199); the Senate Banking Committee ordered it reported with a substitute on 14 May 2026 and reported it on 1 June 2026 (Calendar No. 423). On 15 September 2026 cloture on the motion to proceed failed 49-50 (Record Vote 234), and Sen. Tillis entered a motion to reconsider.

90%

On 12 December 2025 the OCC conditionally approved five national trust bank charter applications (News Release 2025-125): de novo charters for First National Digital Currency Bank and Ripple National Trust Bank, and conversions of BitGo Bank & Trust, Fidelity Digital Assets and Paxos Trust Company to national trust banks. A national trust charter does not itself give access to a Federal Reserve account; the Federal Reserve Board has proposed a separate special-purpose 'payment account' category distinct from master accounts (Regulation D, R-1893; comments closed 27 July 2026).

92%

The Bank Secrecy Act (Pub. L. 91-508, enacted 26 October 1970; 12 U.S.C. 1951 et seq. and 31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.) is the federal AML statute FinCEN applies to crypto money services businesses. Since 18 July 2025 it is no longer the only federal law reaching crypto assets: the GENIUS Act (Pub. L. 119-27) regulates payment stablecoins directly.

85%

The Commodity Exchange Act has no section 1b(3). Its definition of 'commodity' in section 1a(9) (7 U.S.C. 1a(9)) covers 'all other goods and articles' and 'all services, rights, and interests' dealt in for future delivery, and the 2026 SEC interpretation with CFTC guidance (Rel. 33-11412) states that non-security crypto assets other than permitted payment stablecoins could meet that definition.

70%

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations are followed in the U.S., mandating AML/KYC for virtual asset service providers. Maryland aligns with federal compliance of these international standards. [https://fincen.gov/]

109 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by deepseek/deepseek-chat .

Primary Sources

FinCEN. (n.d.). Money Services Business Msb Registration. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/money-services-business-msb-registration

dfs.ny.gov. (n.d.). Virtual Currency Businesses. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://www.dfs.ny.gov/virtual_currency_businesses

nmlsconsumeraccess.org. (n.d.). nmlsconsumeraccess.org. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://nmlsconsumeraccess.org/

dfpi.ca.gov. (n.d.). Digital Financial Assets. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://dfpi.ca.gov/digital-financial-assets/

ncsl.org. (n.d.). Cryptocurrency Digital Or Virtual Currency And Digital Assets 2025 Legislation. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://www.ncsl.org/financial-services/cryptocurrency-digital-or-virtual-currency-and-digital-assets-2025-legislation

crsreports.congress.gov. (n.d.). CRS R46486. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46486

crsreports.congress.gov. (n.d.). CRS IN12278. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12278

gao.gov. (n.d.). GAO-22-105361. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-105361

gao.gov. (n.d.). GAO-24-106292. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-106292

csbs.org. (n.d.). CSBS MSB Network. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.csbs.org/msb-network

dfs.ny.gov. (n.d.). NYDFS Virtual Currency Licensees. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/virtual_currency_licensees

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN Guidance. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/application-fincens-regulations-persons-administering

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN Form 107. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FinCEN_Form_107.pdf

sec.gov. (n.d.). SEC Digital Assets. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/securities-digital-assets

cftc.gov. (n.d.). CFTC Digital Assets. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.cftc.gov/digitalassets/index.htm

dfs.ny.gov. (n.d.). NYDFS BitLicense. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.dfs.ny.gov/legal/regulations/adopted-regulations/part-200-virtual-currencies

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. (n.d.). California MTA. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=FIN&division=1.2.&title=1.&part=&chapter=&article=

csbs.org. (n.d.). CSBS Model MTA. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.csbs.org/model-money-transmission-act

fatf-gafi.org. (n.d.). FATF USA MER 2024. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mer-united-states-2024.html

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov S.4356. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4356

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov H.R.4763. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4763

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov H.R.4766. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/4766

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov S.2349. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2349

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov H.R.1425. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1425

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov H.R.1740. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1740

congress.gov. (n.d.). Congress.gov H.R.6050. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6050

crsreports.congress.gov. (n.d.). CRS R47804. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47804

irs.gov. (n.d.). IRS Notice 2014-21. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.irs.gov/irb/2014-16_IRB#NOT-2014-21

irs.gov. (n.d.). Rev. Rul. 2019-24. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-19-24.pdf

irs.gov. (n.d.). IRS Form 8949. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-8949

irs.gov. (n.d.). IRS FAQ on Virtual Currency. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/frequently-asked-questions-on-virtual-currency-transactions

federalregister.gov. (n.d.). IRS Proposed Regs 1099-DA. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/29/2023-18442/gross-proceeds-and-basis-reporting-by-brokers-and-determination-of-amount-realized-and-amount

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN CDD Rule. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/CDD-Final-Rule.pdf

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN BOI. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/boi

southerninstitute.org. (n.d.). Court Order. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.southerninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Order-granting-MSDJ-4.pdf

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN SAR Rule. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/regulations/1022320-reports-suspicious-activities-money-services-businesses

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN Travel Rule. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/addition-2019-g001

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN Recordkeeping. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/regulations/1010430-record-keeping

justice.gov. (n.d.). DOJ Binance. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/binance-and-ceo-changpeng-zhao-acknowledge-role-money-laundering-and-unlicensed-money

cftc.gov. (n.d.). CFTC Binance. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8840-23

fincen.gov. (n.d.). FinCEN BitMEX. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-fines-bitmex-100-million

justice.gov. (n.d.). DOJ SBF. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/samuel-bankman-fried-found-guilty-seven-counts-fraud-and-conspiracy

sec.gov. (n.d.). SEC Coinbase. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-102

sec.gov. (n.d.). SEC Ripple. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-96

sec.gov. (n.d.). SEC Genesis. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-83

sec.gov. (n.d.). SEC Kraken. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-25

justice.gov. (n.d.). DOJ Ellison. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/caroline-ellison-sentenced-two-years-prison-role-fraud-schemes

Edit History

2026-04-21 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade A
2026-09-09 — refresh-from-research: refreshed — Refreshed from _quarantine/us-licensing.md (researched 2026-08-26); grade A → A

Related Content

Fact IDs: us.licensing.regulator-sec, us.licensing.regulator-cftc, us.licensing.regulator-fincen, us.licensing.regulator-occ, us.licensing.regulator-irs, us.licensing.regulator-federal-reserve, us.licensing.regulator-ofac, us.licensing.regulator-doj, us.licensing.legislation-bank-secrecy-act, us.licensing.legislation-securities-act-of-1933-securities-exchange-act-of-1934

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →