On-shore VASP in Tanzania
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Tanzania with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Customer Due Diligence (CDD) under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), 2006 — collect and verify full name, date of birth, residential address, nationality, and national ID for natural persons; collect registration number, address, directors, and beneficial ownership for legal entities.
- Beneficial ownership identification and verification required for all customers.
- Ongoing monitoring of customer transactions to detect unusual or suspicious activity.
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, customers from high-risk FATF jurisdictions, complex/large transactions, new anonymous technologies, and cross-border virtual asset transfers.
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) Tanzania — report promptly without delay any known or suspected transactions involving proceeds of crime, money laundering, or terrorism financing.
- No tipping-off prohibition — VASPs and employees must not disclose STR submissions to customers or third parties.
- Record-keeping for a minimum of 5 years after business relationship ends or transaction date, covering all identification data, business correspondence, transaction records (dates, amounts, asset types, addresses), and STR records.
Key Restrictions
- Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Tanzania — the Bank of Tanzania has prohibited financial institutions from facilitating crypto transactions.
- There is no specific licensing regime for VASPs; operators face significant legal uncertainty and enforcement risk under the existing general financial services and payment systems framework.
- Any fiat-crypto exchange activity may be classified as unauthorized money transmission or payment processing under the National Payment Systems Act, 2015 (BOT-administered), requiring a license that is not currently available for crypto.
- Custodial services lack any specific regulatory framework — no segregation mandates, cold storage requirements, or insurance/bonding rules exist.
- A local entity (locally incorporated, with physical office and local management) is almost certainly required — no foreign-entity-only operation is feasible.
Key Risks
- High enforcement risk — BoT has publicly maintained a ban on crypto transactions by financial institutions and warned the public against dealing in crypto, creating active legal exposure for any on-shore VASP.
- Regulatory ambiguity — no specific VASP licensing law exists; operators would be operating in a legal gray area with potential for shutdown, penalties, or criminal liability under general financial services regulation.
- Lack of formal prohibition does not equal permission — the absence of a licensing framework means no lawful path to operate, increasing the risk of regulatory enforcement action.
- Reputational and PR risk — operating in a jurisdiction where the central bank has explicitly warned against crypto use may attract negative attention from regulators and the public.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Tanzania has no virtual-asset licensing regime: as at 21 August 2026 there is no VASP licence class, no minimum-capital floor, no application process, no fee schedule, no register and no licensed firm. Tanzanian law does nevertheless define the terms — the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act No. 2 of 2022, assented 23 February 2022, in force 8 March 2022) inserted definitions of "virtual asset" and "virtual asset service provider" into section 3 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423, without attaching any obligation to them. The Bank of Tanzania's public notices of 12 and 29 November 2019, issued under sections 26 and 27 of the Bank of Tanzania Act, 2006 (Act No. 4 of 2006, Cap. 197) and the Foreign Exchange Act, 1992, remain the operative central-bank position, and ESAAMLG rated Tanzania Partially Compliant with Recommendation 15 in its 1st Enhanced Follow-Up Report of September 2022.
Current Stance (Implied): While formal prohibition may not be explicit in specific crypto legislation, the lack of a regulatory framework and the BOT's historical cautious stance on unregulated financial activities mean that operating an unlicensed crypto business could face significant legal uncertainty and potential challenges under existing general financial laws.
Exchanges: If an exchange facilitates the exchange of fiat currency for cryptocurrencies, or vice versa, it might be seen as engaging in money transmission or payment processing activities.
Custody Providers: If a provider holds significant assets on behalf of clients, it could potentially be viewed through the lens of trust services or asset management, which are typically regulated.
The National Payment Systems Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2015) licenses payment systems under section 7, payment instruments under section 17 and the issuance of electronic money under section 26, and its text contains no reference to virtual assets, cryptocurrency or digital currency. Its definition of electronic money requires "monetary value as represented by a claim on its issuer, that is electronically stored in an instrument or device, issued against receipt of funds of an amount not lesser in value than the monetary value issued" and redeemable in cash, which excludes virtual assets. A Bank of Tanzania payment-system, payment-instrument or electronic-money licence therefore reaches the fiat payment leg only and is not a virtual-asset licence, and the Bank of Tanzania has licensed no virtual-asset service provider under this or any other statute.
Tanzania's anti-money-laundering statute is the Anti-Money Laundering Act, originally Act No. 12 of 2006 and consolidated as Cap. 423 R.E. 2022, administered by the Financial Intelligence Unit established under it. Banks, financial institutions, cash dealers and the designated non-financial businesses and professions set out at section 3 paragraphs (a) to (i) are reporting persons and owe customer due diligence, record-keeping and suspicious-transaction reporting duties. Virtual asset service providers appear nowhere in that list, so the Tanzanian AML perimeter does not reach them, and the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Regulations, 2023, G.N. No. 853E of 22 November 2023, made under section 29 of Cap. 423, contain no virtual-asset provision.
Virtual asset service providers are not reporting persons in Tanzania and owe no statutory customer due diligence, transaction-monitoring, record-keeping or suspicious-transaction reporting duty to the Financial Intelligence Unit. The Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act No. 2 of 2022, assented 23 February 2022, in force 8 March 2022) inserted definitions of "virtual asset" and "virtual asset service provider" into section 3 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423, but left the reporting-person list at paragraphs (a) to (i) unchanged, and the Minister has published no Gazette notice under paragraph (j) designating the category. The Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Regulations, 2023, G.N. No. 853E of 22 November 2023, carry no virtual-asset reference, and ESAAMLG rates Tanzania Partially Compliant with Recommendation 15. Tanzania has definitions without obligations.
Highly Likely: For any regulated financial service, a local presence (e.g., a locally incorporated entity, physical office, local management) is typically a prerequisite in Tanzania. This would almost certainly be a requirement for any future crypto licensing.
Evidence fact tz.licensing.bank-of-tanzania-bot not found (may have been renamed).
Role: The central bank responsible for monetary policy, financial sector regulation (including payment systems), and financial stability. Any future crypto framework is highly likely to involve the BOT, especially concerning stablecoins or payment-related virtual assets.
Tanzania prescribes no minimum capital, paid-up share capital or liquid-capital requirement for virtual-asset business, because no virtual-asset licence class exists to attach one to. The Bank of Tanzania's dated press-release and public-notice index carries no virtual-asset licensing notice through 8 June 2026, and ESAAMLG's mutual evaluation of June 2021 records that Tanzania neither licenses nor registers virtual asset service providers and has designated no supervisor for them, rating Recommendation 15 Partially Compliant.
Tanzania's principal AML statute is the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423 (Act No. 12 of 2006, R.E. 2023, commenced 1 July 2007), which imposes obligations on the class of 'reporting person' defined in section 3 paragraphs (a) to (j); the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act No. 2 of 2022, in force 8 March 2022) inserted definitions of 'virtual asset' and 'virtual asset service provider' into section 3 but left virtual asset service providers outside that class, which only a notice published in the Gazette by the Minister under paragraph (j) can extend.
Tanzania's operative AML subsidiary legislation is the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, 2022 (Government Notice No. 397 of 3 June 2022), amended by the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Regulations, 2023 (Government Notice No. 853E of 22 November 2023); regulation 30 of GN No. 397 revoked the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Regulations, 2012 (GN No. 289 of 2012), and neither the 2022 regulations nor the 2023 amendment mentions virtual assets or virtual asset service providers.
Evidence fact tz.aml.identification-and-verification-of-customers not found (may have been renamed).
Beneficial Ownership: Identifying and verifying the identity of the ultimate beneficial owner(s) of the virtual assets or the entity, ensuring that the VASP knows who ultimately owns or controls the funds/assets.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring the business relationship and transactions undertaken by the customer to ensure that they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring for unusual or suspicious activities.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Applying EDD for higher-risk situations, which may include:
Tanzania imposes no suspicious-transaction reporting duty on virtual asset service providers: section 18 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423 R.E. 2023 (section 17 in the R.E. 2022 numbering) binds only a "reporting person", and the section 3 definition of reporting person, at paragraphs (a) to (j), names banks and financial institutions, cash dealers, accountants, real estate agents, auditors, tax advisers, dealers in precious stones, works of art or metals, trust and company service providers, motor vehicle dealers, clearing and forwarding agents, advocates and notaries, pension fund managers, securities market intermediaries, financial leasing entities, microfinance service providers and auctioneers, but no virtual asset service provider, even though section 3 has defined both "virtual asset" and "virtual asset service provider" since the Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2022 (Act No. 2 of 2022) came into force on 8 March 2022.
Suspicious transaction reports in Tanzania are submitted to the Financial Intelligence Unit under section 18 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423 R.E. 2023 by any secure means the Unit specifies, and the Unit operates a goAML portal for that purpose, but the duty falls only on a "reporting person" as defined in section 3, and virtual asset service providers are outside that definition, so no Tanzanian virtual asset service provider owes a reporting obligation to the Unit.
Tanzania's tipping-off prohibition in section 22 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423 R.E. 2023 (section 20 in the R.E. 2022 numbering) is drafted to bind "a person" rather than only a reporting person, so it reaches anyone, including the staff of a virtual asset business, who discloses or warns a person involved in a transaction, or an unauthorised third party, that a suspicious transaction report under section 18 may be prepared, is being prepared or has been sent to the Financial Intelligence Unit; the prohibition attaches to reports made by reporting persons, and virtual asset service providers owe no reporting duty of their own because section 3 omits them from the reporting-person list.
Tanzania's anti-money-laundering record-retention period is ten years, not five: section 17(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap. 423 R.E. 2023 (section 16 in the R.E. 2022 numbering) requires every reporting person to retain records for a minimum period of ten years from the date the transaction is completed, the business relationship ends or the risk assessment is completed, and the duty binds only the reporting persons listed at paragraphs (a) to (j) of section 3, a list that omits virtual asset service providers.
Tanzania has no crypto-custodian licence and no virtual-asset service provider authorisation of any kind: the Bank of Tanzania Act, Cap. 197 creates no such category, the Bank of Tanzania's published Regulations and Guidelines registers carry no virtual-asset instrument, and the Capital Markets and Securities Authority has issued no crypto circular, so a crypto custodian in Tanzania is unlicensed and unsupervised rather than caught by general financial-service rules.
Evidence fact tz.custody.cold-storage-mandates not found (may have been renamed).
Regulator Name: Bank of Tanzania (BoT)
Entity Targeted: The general public, financial institutions, and any individuals or entities attempting to deal in, facilitate, or operate businesses involving cryptocurrencies. Violation Type: Dealing in, facilitating, or promoting instruments not recognized as legal tender; operating unauthorized financial services. Penalty Amount: Not a specific fine amount applied in a single action, but the outcome implies potential prosecution under existing financial laws for unauthorized activities.
Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Tanzania - section 26 of the Bank of Tanzania Act, Cap. 197 gives the Bank the sole right of issue and makes its notes and coins the only legal tender, and the Bank's notices of 12 and 29 November 2019 restate this - but no Tanzanian instrument prohibits financial institutions from facilitating crypto transactions, and the High Court held in Yellow Card Tanzania Limited v Nyamwero Michael Nyamwero, Commercial Case No. 12171 of 2024 (13 December 2024) that crypto trading is not illegal in Tanzania.
Evidence fact tz.enforcement.bank-of-tanzanias-stance-via not found (may have been renamed).
Entity Targeted: Any entity attempting to establish a cryptocurrency exchange, brokerage, or related service within Tanzania. Violation Type: Operating an unauthorized financial institution; providing financial services without a license. Penalty Amount: Not applicable as there are no known licensed entities to fine. The consequence would be prevention of operation or legal action. Outcome: Due to the regulatory stance, no formal licenses have been issued for cryptocurrency businesses. This means any entity attempting to operate such a business would be considered illegal from the outset. This "enforcement" is preventative and structural, rather than reactive with specific penalties.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — an on-shore VASP is not clearly permissible under current Tanzanian law due to the complete absence of a specific VASP licensing regime and the Bank of Tanzania's restrictive stance on crypto, though a locally-incorporated entity would be required if a future framework emerges; operators face high legal uncertainty and must comply with existing AML obligations under the AMLA 2006.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?