← Regulations / Kenya / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in Kenya

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Kenya with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • CDD/EDD: Verify customer identities and UBOs; apply enhanced due diligence for high-risk relationships (cross-border VA activities) — per POCAMLA standards applied to VASPs.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Report suspicious activities involving virtual assets to the Financial Reporting Centre (FRC) promptly.
  • Record-keeping: Retain transaction records, customer data, and verification documents for at least 7 years (per POCAMLA).
  • AML/CFT compliance program required under the VASP Act 2025 and Draft VASP Regulations 2026.
  • The SaaS operator (custodian) bears primary AML obligations as the VASP; white-label clients' AML obligations depend on whether they are themselves regulated entities or end users.

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain a VASP license under the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 and comply with Draft VASP Regulations 2026.
  • Must maintain asset segregation (e.g., 30% of customer stablecoin funds in Kenyan banks).
  • Must have a physical office in Kenya (local entity required).
  • Must comply with CBK oversight if the wallet interfaces with fiat/payment systems.
  • CMA may assert jurisdiction if custodial services involve securities-like crypto assets or tokenized securities.
  • Worldcoin/Tools for Humanity enforcement precedent shows severe penalties (HM) for unauthorized biometric data processing — relevant to any custodial model involving identity verification.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory framework is nascent — VASP Act passed Nov 2025, Draft Regulations still being finalized (2026). Uncertainty around implementation timelines and supervisory interpretation.
  • CBK has a hostile stance toward virtual currencies in formal banking (historical warnings); custodial models interfacing with fiat face bank access risk.
  • DCI Crypto Fraud Unit is actively pursuing enforcement — over 500 cases in 3 years; high-profile arrests create reputational and legal risk for custodians.
  • BitPesa precedent (service termination by Safaricom/M-PESA) demonstrates practical risk of payment-rail access being cut off for crypto-related activity.
  • Tax treatment by KRA on crypto income/custody fees is not fully clarified in the still-evolving regulatory framework.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 80% confidence

Kenya's Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 is Act No. 20 of 2025; it received presidential assent on 15 October 2025, was published in Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 173 (Acts No. 20) on 21 October 2025 and commenced on 4 November 2025, and its implementing regulations were gazetted as Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026 on 22 July 2026.

licensing 80% confidence

The Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026 stopped being a draft on 22 July 2026, when they were gazetted as Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026 in Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 185; they run to 151 regulations in fifteen parts and six schedules and impose licensing, capital, AML/CFT/CPF, cybersecurity, custody, market-conduct and stablecoin reserve duties that are now in force.

licensing 80% confidence

Virtual Asset Service Providers Bill 2025: https://www.afriwise.com/blog/kenya-now-has-a-crypto-law-virtual-asset-service-providers-vasp-bill-2025

licensing 80% confidence

Draft National Policy on VAs and VASPs: https://newsite.treasury.go.ke/sites/default/files/Notices/DRAFT-NATIONAL-POLICY-ON-VAs-AND-VASPs.pdf

licensing 80% confidence

Virtual asset service providers licensed in Kenya must perform customer due diligence before onboarding a client under regulation 32 of the Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026, carried out in accordance with the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, and the Second Schedule to the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 makes every virtual asset service provider a reporting institution under that Act.

licensing 85% confidence

The Second Schedule to Kenya's Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 amends the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act so that the definition of reporting institution expressly includes a virtual asset service provider, which places Kenyan virtual asset service providers under the suspicious transaction reporting duty owed to the Financial Reporting Centre with effect from the Act's commencement on 4 November 2025.

licensing 80% confidence

Kenyan virtual asset service providers must keep a record of both client and own transactions for not less than seven years from the date of the transaction under section 44(2) of the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025, repeated at regulations 22(1)(b) and 26(3) of Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026, and must give the regulator online read-only real-time access to those records under section 44(1).

licensing 80% confidence

Kenya's financial intelligence unit is the Financial Reporting Centre, established under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, which receives and analyses suspicious transaction reports; AML/CFT/CPF supervision and enforcement for virtual asset service providers is carried out by the Central Bank of Kenya and the Capital Markets Authority under section 32 of the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025.

licensing 80% confidence

The Capital Markets Authority licenses and supervises virtual asset exchanges, virtual asset brokers, virtual asset investment advisers, virtual asset managers, virtual asset offering providers conducting initial coin offerings, tokenisation providers and token issuance platforms under the First Schedule to the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025, and section 11(3)(fb) of the Capital Markets Act now requires it to regulate virtual asset service providers.

licensing 80% confidence

The Central Bank of Kenya licenses virtual asset wallet providers, virtual asset payment processors and stablecoin issuance under the First Schedule to the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025, and section 4A(1)(dc) of the Central Bank of Kenya Act now empowers it to license and supervise virtual asset service providers; virtual asset exchanges are licensed by the Capital Markets Authority and fall outside the Central Bank's perimeter.

licensing 80% confidence

The Capital Markets Authority licenses virtual asset exchanges, brokers, investment advisers, managers, initial-coin-offering providers, tokenisation providers and token issuance platforms under the First Schedule to the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025; the implementing rules stopped being drafts on 22 July 2026, when the Virtual Asset Service Providers Regulations, 2026 were gazetted as Legal Notice No. 134 of 2026 in Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 185.

licensing 80% confidence

The Central Bank of Kenya licenses virtual asset wallet providers, virtual asset payment processors and stablecoin issuance under the First Schedule to the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025, and section 4A(1)(dc) of the Central Bank of Kenya Act now empowers it to license and supervise virtual asset service providers; virtual asset exchanges are licensed by the Capital Markets Authority and fall outside the Central Bank's perimeter.

licensing 80% confidence

Kenya's 3 per cent digital asset tax under section 12F of the Income Tax Act, introduced by section 10 of the Finance Act 2023 from 1 September 2023, was repealed and replaced from 1 July 2025 by excise duty at 10 per cent of the excisable value of fees charged on virtual asset transactions, which the provider collects and remits to the Commissioner on or before the twentieth day of the following month; the Virtual Asset Service Providers Act, 2025 made no tax amendment.

enforcement 100% confidence

The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner issued suo motu determination ODPC/COMP/1394/2023 on 6 September 2023 against Worldcoin Foundation, Tools for Humanity and Tools for Humanity GmbH over biometric iris data collected in Kenya; the general penalty in section 73 of the Data Protection Act, No. 24 of 2019 is a fine not exceeding three million shillings or imprisonment not exceeding ten years or both, while the Data Commissioner's administrative penalty notice under sections 62 and 63 is capped at five million shillings or one per cent of an undertaking's preceding annual turnover, whichever is lower.

enforcement 100% confidence

Entity targeted: Bitpesa (operating through Lipsha Consortium Limited). Violation type: Operating money remittance business via Bitcoin without CBK authorization; AML/KYC non-compliance due to cryptocurrency anonymity. Penalty amount: None specified (service termination, not direct fine).

enforcement 90% confidence

Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) Crypto Fraud Unit: Handled over 500 crypto-related cases in past three years; dozens of arrests in 2024. High-profile busts in Nairobi and Nakuru targeted scams worth $119,000, $100,000, and $30,000 (no named entities or penalties detailed). Losses totaled $43.3 million in 2024 scams.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS providers are permitted under the new VASP Act 2025, but require a VASP license, a local physical office, AML/CFT compliance (CDD, STR, 7-year record-keeping), asset segregation (e.g., 30% stablecoin reserves in Kenyan banks), and must navigate CBK oversight on fiat interfaces and a fledgling regulatory framework still being finalized via 2026 draft regulations.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?