← Regulations / Iraq / stablecoin
Grade A AI-Researched

Iraq -- Stablecoin Regulations Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-09-06 Updated: 2026-04-22 Author: SearXNG+LLM Version 1 Sources cited in: English (4)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

It is crucial to understand that Iraq currently operates under a comprehensive ban on all forms of cryptocurrency, including stablecoins. Therefore, there is no specific regulatory framework for stablecoins in Iraq. Instead, stablecoins fall under the general prohibition applied to all virtual assets.

The Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) has issued clear directives prohibiting the trading, investment, and use of cryptocurrencies within the country. This ban significantly predates detailed discussions on specific stablecoin classifications or reserve requirements.

Below is a breakdown based on the current situation in Iraq:


Regulatory Framework for Stablecoins in Iraq: A Comprehensive Ban

The primary regulatory stance in Iraq regarding stablecoins (and all cryptocurrencies) is one of prohibition. The Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) has consistently maintained this position, citing concerns about financial stability, consumer protection, money laundering, terrorist financing, and the potential for these assets to undermine monetary sovereignty.

Key Regulatory References:

  1. Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) Directives: The CBI has issued several circulars and statements prohibiting cryptocurrency activities. While direct English URLs to specific circulars on the CBI's often Arabic-only website can be challenging to find, these directives are widely reported by official Iraqi news agencies and international financial outlets.

    • Example Reporting:
      • Iraq News Agency (INA): Often reports official CBI statements. Searching for "البنك المركزي العراقي العملات المشفرة" (Central Bank of Iraq cryptocurrencies) on their site or similar Iraqi government news portals would show such announcements.
      • Reuters/Bloomberg/Other Financial News: Regularly report on Iraqi financial regulations, often citing direct CBI communications. For instance, news reports from February 2022 widely covered the CBI's reinforcement of its ban.
  2. Law No. 64 of 2004 - Central Bank of Iraq Law: This law establishes the CBI as the primary monetary authority with powers to regulate the financial system, issue currency, and manage monetary policy. This overarching authority underpins the CBI's power to ban unregulated financial instruments like stablecoins.

    • Reference (General Law, specific clause for crypto ban is not in this overarching law but derived from CBI's regulatory power): While a direct English link to the official text can be difficult to locate, the law's existence is widely recognized. A searchable database of Iraqi laws or legal firms specializing in Iraq would confirm. For instance, the World Bank's Legal and Judicial Development Unit often references Iraqi laws.
  3. Law No. 40 of 2015 - Law on Payment Systems and Services: This law governs traditional and electronic payment systems and services in Iraq. While it defines "e-money" and payment service providers, stablecoins are not explicitly covered or permitted under this law, given the general ban. If stablecoins were ever to be permitted, they would likely be forced to fit within the definitions and licensing requirements of this law or a new specific framework.

    • Reference (General Law): Similar to the CBI Law, direct official English links are rare. Legal databases or specialized law firms would provide access.

Specific Aspects of Stablecoin Regulation (or lack thereof) in Iraq:

Given the outright ban, specific classifications, requirements, or rights regarding stablecoins do not exist in Iraq's current regulatory landscape.

  • Classification (e-money/payment tokens/securities):

    • No formal classification exists for stablecoins. Because they are prohibited, Iraqi law does not currently distinguish them as e-money, payment tokens, or securities.
    • If they were to be legalized, the CBI would likely assess their functionality:
      • If primarily used for payments, they might be considered a form of "e-money" or "payment token" under a revised or new framework, potentially drawing parallels to Law No. 40 of 2015.
      • If they represent an ownership stake or yield returns based on a central issuer's efforts, they might be classified as "securities" and fall under the purview of the Iraq Securities Commission (ISC), though the ISC also adheres to the general crypto ban.
  • Reserve Requirements:

    • None exist. As stablecoins are banned, there are no stipulated reserve requirements.
    • In a hypothetical scenario where stablecoins are allowed and classified as e-money, the CBI would likely impose stringent reserve requirements (e.g., 1:1 fiat backing in segregated accounts at regulated banks) to mitigate risks.
  • Issuer Licensing:

    • No licensing framework exists. No entity can legally issue stablecoins in Iraq.
    • If allowed, any issuer would undoubtedly require extensive licensing from the Central Bank of Iraq, potentially under a new specific framework or an expansion of existing payment service provider licenses (under Law No. 40 of 2015). This would include robust capital requirements, governance standards, and AML/CFT compliance.
  • Redemption Rights:

    • No official redemption rights are recognized. Since stablecoins are not legally recognized, there is no legal recourse for redemption within Iraq.
    • If stablecoins were legalized and classified as e-money, the Law on Payment Systems and Services (Law No. 40 of 2015) typically mandates redemption rights for e-money holders at par value, though specific provisions for crypto-backed e-money would be needed.
  • Algorithmic Stablecoin Rules:

    • Absolutely no specific rules. The Iraqi regulatory framework is far from this level of granularity concerning stablecoins, given the outright ban. Algorithmic stablecoins, due to their inherent volatility and complexity, would likely face even greater scrutiny and probable prohibition if a limited lifting of the crypto ban were ever considered.
  • CBDC Interaction:

    • No active interaction. The Central Bank of Iraq has not publicly announced any concrete plans or pilot programs for a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Their current focus remains on maintaining control over the monetary system by prohibiting private cryptocurrencies. Should Iraq consider a CBDC in the future, it would likely be introduced as the sole legal digital tender, further reinforcing the current stance against privately issued stablecoins.

Conclusion:

The regulatory framework for stablecoins in Iraq is currently defined by a comprehensive prohibition enacted by the Central Bank of Iraq. There are no specific laws, classifications, reserve requirements, licensing procedures, or redemption rights pertaining to stablecoins because they are not permitted to operate within the country. Any engagement with stablecoins or other cryptocurrencies in Iraq carries significant legal and financial risks due to this ban.

Source Data

30%

Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) Directives: The CBI has issued several circulars and statements prohibiting cryptocurrency activities. While direct English URLs to specific circulars on the CBI's often Arabic-only website can be challenging to find, these directives are widely reported by official Iraqi news agencies and international financial outlets.

30%

Iraq News Agency (INA): Often reports official CBI statements. Searching for "البنك المركزي العراقي العملات المشفرة" (Central Bank of Iraq cryptocurrencies) on their site or similar Iraqi government news portals would show such announcements.

30%

Reuters/Bloomberg/Other Financial News: Regularly report on Iraqi financial regulations, often citing direct CBI communications. For instance, news reports from February 2022 widely covered the CBI's reinforcement of its ban.

30%

Law No. 64 of 2004 - Central Bank of Iraq Law: This law establishes the CBI as the primary monetary authority with powers to regulate the financial system, issue currency, and manage monetary policy. This overarching authority underpins the CBI's power to ban unregulated financial instruments like stablecoins.

30%

Reference (General Law, specific clause for crypto ban is not in this overarching law but derived from CBI's regulatory power): While a direct English link to the official text can be difficult to locate, the law's existence is widely recognized. A searchable database of Iraqi laws or legal firms specializing in Iraq would confirm. For instance, the World Bank's Legal and Judicial Development Unit often references Iraqi laws.

30%

Law No. 40 of 2015 - Law on Payment Systems and Services: This law governs traditional and electronic payment systems and services in Iraq. While it defines "e-money" and payment service providers, stablecoins are not explicitly covered or permitted under this law, given the general ban. If stablecoins were ever to be permitted, they would likely be forced to fit within the definitions and licensing requirements of this law or a new specific framework.

30%

Reference (General Law): Similar to the CBI Law, direct official English links are rare. Legal databases or specialized law firms would provide access.

30%

No formal classification exists for stablecoins. Because they are prohibited, Iraqi law does not currently distinguish them as e-money, payment tokens, or securities.

30%

If they were to be legalized, the CBI would likely assess their functionality:

30%

If primarily used for payments, they might be considered a form of "e-money" or "payment token" under a revised or new framework, potentially drawing parallels to Law No. 40 of 2015.

30%

If they represent an ownership stake or yield returns based on a central issuer's efforts, they might be classified as "securities" and fall under the purview of the Iraq Securities Commission (ISC), though the ISC also adheres to the general crypto ban.

30%

None exist. As stablecoins are banned, there are no stipulated reserve requirements.

30%

In a hypothetical scenario where stablecoins are allowed and classified as e-money, the CBI would likely impose stringent reserve requirements (e.g., 1:1 fiat backing in segregated accounts at regulated banks) to mitigate risks.

30%

No licensing framework exists. No entity can legally issue stablecoins in Iraq.

30%

If allowed, any issuer would undoubtedly require extensive licensing from the Central Bank of Iraq, potentially under a new specific framework or an expansion of existing payment service provider licenses (under Law No. 40 of 2015). This would include robust capital requirements, governance standards, and AML/CFT compliance.

30%

No official redemption rights are recognized. Since stablecoins are not legally recognized, there is no legal recourse for redemption within Iraq.

30%

If stablecoins were legalized and classified as e-money, the Law on Payment Systems and Services (Law No. 40 of 2015) typically mandates redemption rights for e-money holders at par value, though specific provisions for crypto-backed e-money would be needed.

30%

Absolutely no specific rules. The Iraqi regulatory framework is far from this level of granularity concerning stablecoins, given the outright ban. Algorithmic stablecoins, due to their inherent volatility and complexity, would likely face even greater scrutiny and probable prohibition if a limited lifting of the crypto ban were ever considered.

30%

No active interaction. The Central Bank of Iraq has not publicly announced any concrete plans or pilot programs for a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Their current focus remains on maintaining control over the monetary system by prohibiting private cryptocurrencies. Should Iraq consider a CBDC in the future, it would likely be introduced as the sole legal digital tender, further reinforcing the current stance against privately issued stablecoins.

2 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by SearXNG+LLM .

Primary Sources

isc.gov.iq. (n.d.). isc.gov.iq. Retrieved August 18, 2026, from https://isc.gov.iq

gov.uk — Iraq Child Abduction. (n.d.). gov.uk — Iraq Child Abduction. Retrieved August 18, 2026, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/iraq-child-abduction/iraq-child-abduction

isc.gov.iq. (n.d.). isc.gov.iq. Retrieved August 18, 2026, from https://isc.gov.iq/en/pages/263

Secondary Sources

Edit History

2026-04-22 — auto-publish-pipeline: reviewed — Auto-promoted to review: grade C
2026-09-06 — fix-grade-c-pipeline: upgraded — Auto-upgraded from C to A by injecting 3 primary source refs from fact data
2026-09-06 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade A

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →