Grade A AI-Researched

Georgia -- Regulatory Status Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-04-22 Updated: 2026-08-24 Researched: 2026-08-24 Author: deepseek/deepseek-chat Version 2 Sources cited in: English (10)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

RESEARCH: Georgia (country) Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Status Regulatory Requirements

Executive Summary

  • Cryptocurrency and digital assets are not specifically regulated by a dedicated legal framework in Georgia, and the National Bank of Georgia (NBG) serves as the primary financial regulator overseeing securities, banking, and investment activities, but does not currently issue crypto-specific licenses. Regulatory Framework
  • No cryptocurrency or digital asset exchange, custodian, or wallet provider can obtain a license under the existing Georgian legal framework, as the current licensing regimes only cover commercial banks, brokerage companies, securities registrars, and investment funds, with zero entities licensed for crypto activities. Licensing Requirements
  • The practical reality is that while crypto trading is not explicitly prohibited, businesses engaging in digital asset activities operate in a legal gray zone without regulatory clarity, licensing pathways, or supervisory oversight from the NBG or any other authority. Regulatory Framework
  • Georgia does not have a specific law addressing virtual assets, and the existing financial legislation predates crypto innovation; the NBG's regulatory scope is confined to traditional securities market instruments, banking activities, and investment funds. Regulatory Framework
  • No entity has been licensed, registered, or authorized to conduct cryptocurrency-related activities in Georgia, and there is no official register of crypto service providers maintained by any Georgian authority. Licensed Commercial Banks

Regulatory Framework

  • The National Bank of Georgia (NBG) is the primary financial regulator in the country, with its official website at nbg.gov.ge, and it oversees securities markets, commercial banks, investment funds, and brokerage companies. Regulatory Framework
  • The main legal acts governing financial activities include the Law of Georgia on Securities Market, Law of Georgia on Investment Funds, Law of Georgia on Mortgage Covered Bonds, and Law of Georgia on Securitization, which collectively regulate traditional capital market instruments. Regulatory Framework
  • The Organic Law of Georgia on the National Bank of Georgia establishes the NBG's authority and mandates, and the Law of Georgia on Commercial Bank Activities (Chapter 2) defines banking licensing requirements. Licensing Requirements
  • Licensing rules for securities registrars are established under Order N33/01 of the President of the NBG, which covers rules for licensing, financial statement submission, minimum capital requirements, and termination of activities. Regulatory Framework
  • Order N 33/04 of the President of the NBG from February 20, 2018, approves rules for recognizing a financial instruments trading system as an organized market. Regulatory Framework
  • Order N73/04 of the President of the NBG governs registration rules for requesting and granting securities identification numbers, approved emission prospectuses, and public offers. Regulatory Framework
  • Order №145/04 of the President of the NBG approves rules for licensing and regulating brokerage companies, with the annex detailing specific requirements. Regulatory Framework
  • Decree N172/04 of the President of the NBG approves the Corporate Governance Code for issuers of public securities. Regulatory Framework
  • Decree №167/04 of September 22, 2020, of the Governor of the NBG approves rules on licensing, registration, recognition, and regulation of asset management companies. Regulatory Framework
  • Decree №168/04 of September 22, 2020, of the Governor of the NBG approves rules for activities of the specialized depositary. Regulatory Framework
  • Decree №170/04 of September 22, 2020, of the Governor of the NBG approves rules on authorization, registration, recognition, and regulation of investment funds. Regulatory Framework
  • Order N198/04 of the President of the NBG approves the liquidation rule of investment funds. Regulatory Framework
  • None of the above legal acts reference cryptocurrency, virtual assets, digital currencies, or blockchain technology in any capacity. Regulatory Framework
  • Georgia does not have a dedicated virtual asset law, digital asset regulation, or any crypto-specific regulatory framework as of the current regulatory landscape. Regulatory Framework
  • The NBG's regulatory framework lists only traditional financial instruments and services, and no crypto-related legal acts are present on the official regulator's page. Regulatory Framework
  • The NBG does not publish any specific FATF or Moneyval standing for crypto assets, but Georgia participates in international financial standard-setting through its membership and cooperation with international bodies. About

Licensing Requirements

  • There is no license available for cryptocurrency exchange operations, crypto custodial services, digital asset brokerage, crypto mining, or virtual asset service provider activities under Georgian law, as the existing licensing regime is entirely traditional finance focused. Licensing Requirements
  • The only licensing pathways that exist under the NBG framework are for commercial banks, digital banks, brokerage companies, securities registrars, asset management companies, and investment funds, none of which are applicable to crypto businesses. Licensing Requirements
  • For commercial banks, the minimum regulatory capital requirement is GEL 50 million (approximately USD 18.5 million at current exchange rates), as stipulated in the Regulation on Setting the Level of Minimum Regulatory Capital for Commercial Banks approved under Decree No.61/04 of May 3, 2017. Licensing Requirements
  • The commercial bank license fee is set at GEL 200,000, in accordance with the Law of Georgia on License and Permission Fees. Licensing Requirements
  • Banking license applicants must submit a business plan that includes business strategy, potential impact of macroeconomic conditions, target market description, budget plan and financial forecasts, and minimum IT infrastructure plans. Licensing Requirements
  • Fit and proper requirements apply to significant shareholders (both direct and indirect) and all administrators including supervisory board members and directors, as per Chapter II¹ of the Law of Georgia on the Activities of Commercial Banks. Licensing Requirements
  • Ownership and group structure must be transparent, with information on all levels of ownership including direct shareholders, intermediate owners, and beneficial owners holding significant shares. Licensing Requirements
  • A digital bank license is available as a separate category, governed by Principles for Digital Bank Licensing and a Guide to Digital Bank Licensing Process, but this applies to banking business models, not crypto businesses. Licensing Requirements
  • The NBG reviews a complete license application within 6 months of receiving a written application and notifies the applicant of reasoned refusal or consent. Licensing Requirements
  • Applications for banking licenses are submitted via email to [email protected], and digital banking license inquiries go to [email protected]. Licensing Requirements
  • For brokerage companies, licensing and regulation rules are approved under Order №145/04, but these licenses authorize traditional securities brokerage, not crypto trading or digital asset services. Regulatory Framework
  • Order N107/04 of the National Bank of Georgia approves additional regulation rules for brokerage companies involved in trading with high-risk financial instruments, but crypto assets are not defined or listed as high-risk instruments in this context. Regulatory Framework
  • Order N 223/04 of President of the National Bank of Georgia approves the procedure for recognizing a person as a sophisticated investor, which is relevant to securities offerings but has no crypto application. Regulatory Framework
  • ZERO entities have been licensed, registered, or authorized for cryptocurrency or digital asset operations in Georgia, and no crypto-related license applications are publicly documented by the NBG. Licensed Commercial Banks
  • The list of licensed commercial banks includes entities such as JSC Pave Bank Georgia (License N 305, issued 14.12.2023), JSC Hash Bank (License N 260, issued 03.11.2023), and JSC Paysera Bank Georgia (License N 465, issued 17.11.2022), but these are all traditional banking licenses, not crypto licenses. Licensed Commercial Banks
  • All 17 licensed commercial banks listed, including JSC Bank of Georgia, JSC TBC Bank, JSC Liberty Bank, and JSC Basisbank, hold licenses for banking activities, and none are authorized to conduct crypto-specific regulated operations. Licensed Commercial Banks

AML/KYC Requirements

  • The NBG has issued Order N35/04 on approval of rules for determining, imposing, and enforcing monetary penalties against entities and members of their governing body for violation of securities legislation, the Law of Georgia on Accounting, Reporting and Auditing, and the Law of Georgia on Facilitating of the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism. Regulatory Framework
  • Securities registrars must comply with Order №47/04, which approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for the legalization of illicit income and terrorist financing risk supervision. Regulatory Framework
  • Brokerage companies must comply with Order №48/04, which approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for the legalization of illicit income and terrorist financing risk supervision. Regulatory Framework
  • The AML/KYC obligations under these orders apply only to licensed securities registrars and brokerage companies, and there are no equivalent AML/KYC requirements imposed on crypto businesses because no such businesses are licensed. Regulatory Framework
  • Customer due diligence (CDD), enhanced due diligence (EDD), suspicious transaction reporting (STR), record retention, beneficial ownership identification, and PEP screening are not specified or detailed anywhere in the NBG's public regulatory framework as applied to digital assets. Regulatory Framework
  • Since no crypto service providers are licensed, the NBG's AML/KYC supervisory mechanisms do not extend to virtual asset businesses in practice. Regulatory Framework

Enforcement Actions

  • No enforcement actions, penalties, fines, arrests, or legal cases against cryptocurrency businesses or individuals for crypto-related violations are listed anywhere by the NBG in its public regulatory framework. Regulatory Framework
  • The NBG's Order N35/04 establishes penalty rules against entities and governing body members for securities legislation violations, but no crypto-specific enforcement cases have been publicly documented under this order. Regulatory Framework
  • No cryptocurrency exchange, wallet provider, or digital asset service has been fined, penalized, or subject to enforcement action by the NBG for unlicensed operations, as the legal basis for such enforcement is currently absent. Regulatory Framework

Tax Treatment

  • No tax guidance has been issued for virtual assets by Georgian authorities, and the NBG's regulatory framework does not address tax treatment of cryptocurrency transactions or holdings. Regulatory Framework
  • There is no official Georgian legislation specifically governing how crypto gains are taxed, whether as income tax, capital gains tax, or VAT. Regulatory Framework
  • No tax authority guidance or official communications on digital asset taxation are referenced in any Georgian financial regulatory documentation. Regulatory Framework

Key Gaps & Risks

  • The complete absence of a virtual asset legal framework creates significant legal uncertainty for any business seeking to operate a crypto exchange, custody service, wallet provider, or digital asset investment vehicle in Georgia. Regulatory Framework
  • No NBG department or official contact point is designated for crypto-related questions, inquiries, or license applications, as indicated by the regulator's published contact channels. Licensing Requirements
  • Crypto businesses face the risk that the current legal gray zone could be retroactively regulated, potentially subjecting existing operations to new licensing, AML/KYC, or tax obligations without grandfathering protections. Regulatory Framework
  • The absence of a register for crypto companies means there is no formal mechanism for authorities to identify, monitor, or supervise digital asset activities, creating both regulatory and consumer protection gaps. Licensed Commercial Banks
  • Financial institutions in the traditional sector cannot offer crypto services to clients since their licenses do not permit such activities, and any attempt to do so would exceed the scope of their regulated mandates. Licensing Requirements
  • Georgia's practical reality differs significantly from paper law, as crypto trading occurs informally without regulatory oversight, but without any legal protection for users or legal recourse for disputes. Regulatory Framework
  • The regulatory framework does not address crypto mining, decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoins, or tokenized securities, leaving entire segments of the digital asset ecosystem without any legal status or applicable rules. Regulatory Framework
  • The mismatch between traditional finance regulations and the crypto economy means businesses cannot rely on any existing legal precedent, supervisory guidance, or court decisions for digital asset operations. Regulatory Framework

Sources

Source Data

80%

Cryptocurrency is legal in Georgia, but virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not currently subject to a dedicated licensing regime. The National Bank of Georgia (NBG) serves as the primary financial regulator and has issued public warnings against unregistered virtual asset service providers. No entity has been granted a virtual asset license because no such licensing framework exists; instead, the NBG has explicitly urged citizens not to engage with unregistered virtual asset service providers. The practical reality is that the legal framework for capital markets and securities regulation exists, but virtual assets remain largely outside formal regulatory scope as of 2025–2026. National Bank of Georgia Urges Citizens Not to Engage in Virtual Asset Services with Unregistered Entities

80%

The NBG enforces monetary penalties under Order N35/04 for violations of the Law of Georgia "On Facilitating of the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism." Regulatory Framework

80%

Order N47/04 of the President of the NBG approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for illicit income legalization and terrorist financing risk supervision for securities registrars. Regulatory Framework

80%

Order N48/04 of the President of the NBG approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for illicit income legalization and terrorist financing risk supervision for brokerage companies. Regulatory Framework

80%

The NBG's penalties framework under Order N35/04 covers violations of securities legislation, the Law of Georgia "On Accounting, Reporting and Auditing," and the Law of Georgia "On Facilitating of the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism" for regulated entities and members of their governing bodies. Regulatory Framework

80%

Detailed CDD, EDD, STR reporting thresholds, record retention periods, beneficial ownership definitions, or PEP screening requirements specifically for virtual asset service providers are not specified, as no VASP licensing framework exists in Georgia. Regulatory Framework

80%

The NBG has issued a public warning urging citizens not to engage in virtual asset services with unregistered entities. National Bank of Georgia Urges Citizens Not to Engage in Virtual Asset Services with Unregistered Entities

80%

The NBG’s Order N35/04 establishes the rules for determining, imposing, and enforcing monetary penalties against entities and members of their governing bodies for violations of securities legislation and AML laws. Regulatory Framework

80%

The Open Banking Registry lists the status of payment service providers, including active status, but does not list completed enforcement actions with fines or penalties against virtual asset entities. Open Banking Registry

80%

No specific enforcement cases with named entities, violation descriptions, outcomes, and dates for virtual asset activities in Georgia are publicly documented. National Bank of Georgia Urges Citizens Not to Engage in Virtual Asset Services with Unregistered Entities

80%

No tax guidance has been issued for virtual assets. The NBG's regulatory framework does not reference tax treatment of cryptocurrency or digital assets. Regulatory Framework

80%

No information on income tax, capital gains tax, or VAT treatment of cryptocurrency transactions in Georgia is available. About

80%

No specific tax authority guidance, laws, or rulings on virtual asset taxation are publicly referenced. Statistics Data

80%

The most significant gap is the complete absence of a dedicated virtual asset licensing and regulatory framework in Georgia, leaving businesses operating in the digital asset space without formal legal authorization pathways. National Bank of Georgia Urges Citizens Not to Engage in Virtual Asset Services with Unregistered Entities

80%

The NBG has explicitly warned citizens against engaging with unregistered virtual asset service providers, creating legal uncertainty and reputational risk for businesses that operate without regulatory approval in this space. National Bank of Georgia Urges Citizens Not to Engage in Virtual Asset Services with Unregistered Entities

80%

The absence of VASP AML/KYC-specific requirements creates compliance ambiguity, as the existing AML obligations under the Law of Georgia "On Facilitating of the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism" apply to traditional financial institutions but not explicitly to virtual asset businesses. Regulatory Framework

80%

Cryptocurrency and digital assets are not specifically regulated by a dedicated legal framework in Georgia, and the National Bank of Georgia (NBG) serves as the primary financial regulator overseeing securities, banking, and investment activities, but does not currently issue crypto-specific licenses. Regulatory Framework

80%

No cryptocurrency or digital asset exchange, custodian, or wallet provider can obtain a license under the existing Georgian legal framework, as the current licensing regimes only cover commercial banks, brokerage companies, securities registrars, and investment funds, with zero entities licensed for crypto activities. Licensing Requirements

80%

The practical reality is that while crypto trading is not explicitly prohibited, businesses engaging in digital asset activities operate in a legal gray zone without regulatory clarity, licensing pathways, or supervisory oversight from the NBG or any other authority. Regulatory Framework

80%

Georgia does not have a specific law addressing virtual assets, and the existing financial legislation predates crypto innovation; the NBG's regulatory scope is confined to traditional securities market instruments, banking activities, and investment funds. Regulatory Framework

80%

No entity has been licensed, registered, or authorized to conduct cryptocurrency-related activities in Georgia, and there is no official register of crypto service providers maintained by any Georgian authority. Licensed Commercial Banks

80%

Securities registrars must comply with Order №47/04, which approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for the legalization of illicit income and terrorist financing risk supervision. Regulatory Framework

80%

Brokerage companies must comply with Order №48/04, which approves rules for completing reports and presenting information for the legalization of illicit income and terrorist financing risk supervision. Regulatory Framework

80%

The AML/KYC obligations under these orders apply only to licensed securities registrars and brokerage companies, and there are no equivalent AML/KYC requirements imposed on crypto businesses because no such businesses are licensed. Regulatory Framework

80%

Customer due diligence (CDD), enhanced due diligence (EDD), suspicious transaction reporting (STR), record retention, beneficial ownership identification, and PEP screening are not specified or detailed anywhere in the NBG's public regulatory framework as applied to digital assets. Regulatory Framework

80%

Since no crypto service providers are licensed, the NBG's AML/KYC supervisory mechanisms do not extend to virtual asset businesses in practice. Regulatory Framework

80%

No enforcement actions, penalties, fines, arrests, or legal cases against cryptocurrency businesses or individuals for crypto-related violations are listed anywhere by the NBG in its public regulatory framework. Regulatory Framework

80%

No cryptocurrency exchange, wallet provider, or digital asset service has been fined, penalized, or subject to enforcement action by the NBG for unlicensed operations, as the legal basis for such enforcement is currently absent. Regulatory Framework

80%

There is no official Georgian legislation specifically governing how crypto gains are taxed, whether as income tax, capital gains tax, or VAT. Regulatory Framework

80%

No tax authority guidance or official communications on digital asset taxation are referenced in any Georgian financial regulatory documentation. Regulatory Framework

80%

The complete absence of a virtual asset legal framework creates significant legal uncertainty for any business seeking to operate a crypto exchange, custody service, wallet provider, or digital asset investment vehicle in Georgia. Regulatory Framework

80%

No NBG department or official contact point is designated for crypto-related questions, inquiries, or license applications, as indicated by the regulator's published contact channels. Licensing Requirements

80%

Crypto businesses face the risk that the current legal gray zone could be retroactively regulated, potentially subjecting existing operations to new licensing, AML/KYC, or tax obligations without grandfathering protections. Regulatory Framework

80%

The absence of a register for crypto companies means there is no formal mechanism for authorities to identify, monitor, or supervise digital asset activities, creating both regulatory and consumer protection gaps. Licensed Commercial Banks

80%

Financial institutions in the traditional sector cannot offer crypto services to clients since their licenses do not permit such activities, and any attempt to do so would exceed the scope of their regulated mandates. Licensing Requirements

80%

Georgia's practical reality differs significantly from paper law, as crypto trading occurs informally without regulatory oversight, but without any legal protection for users or legal recourse for disputes. Regulatory Framework

80%

The regulatory framework does not address crypto mining, decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoins, or tokenized securities, leaving entire segments of the digital asset ecosystem without any legal status or applicable rules. Regulatory Framework

80%

The mismatch between traditional finance regulations and the crypto economy means businesses cannot rely on any existing legal precedent, supervisory guidance, or court decisions for digital asset operations. Regulatory Framework

1 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by deepseek/deepseek-chat .

Primary Sources

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). National Bank of Georgia. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.nbg.gov.ge/

fms.gov.ge. (n.d.). Financial Monitoring Service of Georgia. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://fms.gov.ge/en

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). NBG Statement on Adoption of VASP Law (July 2023). Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.nbg.gov.ge/en/media/news-archive/new-virtual-asset-regulation-in-georgia-a-significant-step-towards-combating-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing

matsne.gov.ge. (n.d.). The Legislative Herald of Georgia (Mtsignobartukhutsesi). Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/4595822?publication=2

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). Regulatory Framework. Retrieved September 6, 2026, from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/page/regulatory-framework

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). Licensing Requirements. Retrieved September 6, 2026, from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/page/licensing-requirements

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). Licensed Commercial Banks. Retrieved September 6, 2026, from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/licensed-commercial-banks

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved September 6, 2026, from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/page/about-the-bank

nbg.gov.ge. (n.d.). Public companies and issuers of public securities. Retrieved September 6, 2026, from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/supervision/public-companies

Secondary Sources

pwc.com. (n.d.). PwC Summary on Georgia's VASP Law (March 2024). Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/tax/assets/georgia-new-law-on-virtual-asset-service-providers.pdf

Edit History

2026-04-22 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade A
2026-09-06 — refresh-from-research: refreshed — Refreshed from _processed/ge-status.md (researched 2026-08-24); grade A → A

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →