← Regulations / Cote d'Ivoire / travel-rule
Grade A AI-Researched

Cote d'Ivoire -- Travel Rule Implementation Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-04-26 Updated: 2026-04-22 Author: SearXNG+LLM Version 1 Sources cited in: English (5)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

Côte d'Ivoire, as a member of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA) and the Inter-Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), has adopted the FATF Travel Rule through regional frameworks and implementing regulations issued by the Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO), which is the monetary and regulatory authority for UEMOA member states.

Here's a breakdown of the status:

1. Adoption Status and Effective Date

  • Adopted: Yes, primarily through the UEMOA regional framework and subsequent BCEAO instructions.

  • Key Legislation/Guidance:

    • UEMOA Directive No. 02/2021/CM/UEMOA of 29 March 2021 relating to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing in the UEMOA region. This directive updates the regional AML/CFT framework to align with the latest FATF Recommendations, including those pertaining to virtual assets and VASPs.
      • URL (Official Journal of UEMOA): While a direct link to the directive's text might require specific access to UEMOA's official journal, references to it are widespread in BCEAO documents.
    • BCEAO Instruction No. 003/2022/RB of 17 November 2022 relating to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing by entities subject to the control of the BCEAO. This instruction specifically integrates "virtual asset service providers (PSAVs)" into the scope of regulated entities and details their AML/CFT obligations.
      • URL (BCEAO - often available in regulatory sections): While direct links can be ephemeral, you can often find a listing on the BCEAO website's regulatory texts section. A common search phrase for official documents is "Instruction BCEAO LAB/CFT PSAV."
    • Côte d'Ivoire National Law: While the BCEAO instruction is binding, Côte d'Ivoire also has Law No. 2016-1110 of 8 December 2016 on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. This national law provides the overarching legal framework and defines penalties, but the specifics for VASPs are mostly derived from the BCEAO texts. Updates to the national law would ensure full alignment, but the BCEAO regulations are immediately applicable to supervised entities.
  • Effective Date: The BCEAO Instruction No. 003/2022/RB became effective upon its publication in November 2022, obliging regulated entities, including PSAVs, to implement the requirements within specified timelines for compliance.

2. Threshold Amounts

The FATF Travel Rule generally requires the collection and transmission of originator and beneficiary information for all virtual asset transfers, regardless of the amount. However, the requirement to transmit this information to the beneficiary VASP (the "Travel Rule" itself) often aligns with the FATF's informal guidance for cross-border transfers:

  • For cross-border transfers: The Travel Rule information (originator and beneficiary details) must be transmitted for transfers exceeding EUR 1,000 (or equivalent). Below this threshold, VASPs are still required to collect and hold the information but may not be required to send it with the transfer itself to the beneficiary VASP, unless deemed suspicious.
  • For domestic transfers: While the €1,000 threshold is common for cross-border, many jurisdictions, and the spirit of FATF guidance, suggest that for domestic transfers, this information should be collected and retained for all transactions, and transmitted to the beneficiary VASP where possible, especially if the recipient is another VASP. The BCEAO instruction often refers to thresholds for reporting suspicious transactions (e.g., occasional transactions over a certain amount trigger full CDD), but for the Travel Rule itself, the emphasis is on comprehensive data collection.

Specific thresholds for reporting suspicious transactions to the national Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the Cellule Nationale de Traitement des Informations Financières (CENTIF) in Côte d'Ivoire, are defined separately and are typically much lower or apply regardless of amount if suspicion exists.

3. Which VASPs are Covered

The BCEAO Instruction No. 003/2022/RB explicitly covers "Prestataires de Services sur Actifs Virtuels (PSAVs)" – Virtual Asset Service Providers. This includes any natural or legal person who conducts, as a business, one or more of the following activities or operations for or on behalf of another natural or legal person:

  • Exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies.
  • Exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets.
  • Transfer of virtual assets.
  • Safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets.
  • Participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and/or sale of a virtual asset.

These PSAVs are considered "reporting entities" and are subject to the same AML/CFT obligations as traditional financial institutions under BCEAO supervision.

4. Technical Implementation Requirements

The BCEAO Instruction requires PSAVs to:

  • Collect and retain accurate and meaningful originator and beneficiary information for all virtual asset transfers. This information typically includes:
    • Originator Information: Name, account number (or unique transaction identifier), physical address, national identity number (or customer identification number), date and place of birth (for natural persons), or place of registration (for legal entities).
    • Beneficiary Information: Name, account number (or unique transaction identifier), and where applicable, physical address or national identity number (or customer identification number).
  • Transmit this information to the beneficiary VASP immediately and securely, along with the virtual asset transfer itself, or through a secure messaging system that ensures the information is received before or at the time of the transfer.
  • Conduct due diligence on both the originator and beneficiary, including enhanced due diligence for high-risk transactions.
  • Screen transactions for sanctions compliance.
  • Maintain records of all transactions and customer information for at least five years.
  • Implement risk-based approaches to assess and mitigate ML/TF risks associated with virtual asset activities.

While the BCEAO instruction mandates what information needs to be transmitted, it typically does not prescribe a specific technical solution or protocol. PSAVs are expected to adopt reliable, secure, and interoperable solutions. Global standards like TRISA, OpenVASP, or Travel Rule Protocol (TRP) are examples of solutions that could be utilized, but their use is not explicitly mandated by BCEAO.

5. Penalties for Non-Compliance

Penalties for non-compliance are generally outlined in the national AML/CFT law (Law No. 2016-1110) and the BCEAO's regulatory framework for supervised entities. These can be severe and include:

  • Administrative Sanctions: Imposed by the BCEAO or CENTIF. These can range from warnings and reprimands to substantial financial penalties (fines proportional to the severity and duration of the breach, or a percentage of turnover), temporary suspension of activities, or even permanent withdrawal of operating licenses.
  • Criminal Sanctions: For severe or repeated breaches, especially those involving intentional facilitation of money laundering or terrorist financing, criminal charges can be brought against individuals (directors, employees) and the entity itself. These can include imprisonment and heavier fines, as defined in the national penal code and AML/CFT law.
  • Reputational Damage: Non-compliance can lead to significant damage to a VASP's reputation, loss of customer trust, and difficulty in maintaining banking relationships.

The BCEAO, as the supervisory authority, has the power to conduct inspections, impose corrective measures, and levy fines on regulated entities, including PSAVs, that fail to comply with its instructions regarding AML/CFT.

Disclaimer: This information is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific compliance requirements, it is essential to consult the relevant official texts from UEMOA/BCEAO and Côte d'Ivoire, and seek advice from legal professionals specializing in AML/CFT and financial regulations in the region.

Source Data

80%

No crypto travel rule is in force in Côte d'Ivoire, or anywhere in UEMOA. The originator/beneficiary information duties are articles 39–47 of the Loi uniforme LBC/FT/FP du 31 mars 2023 (transposed in Côte d'Ivoire by Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023). Article 39 opens 'Les institutions financières qui effectuent des virements électroniques nationaux, intracommunautaires et internationaux sont tenues d'obtenir et de vérifier, concernant le donneur d'ordre...' — those articles bind only 'institutions financières', a category art. 2(41) defines separately from 'prestataire de services d'actifs virtuels' (art. 2(51)), and they make no reference to virtual assets. Article 58 requires prior agrément for PSAV activity but no competent authority has been designated, and no BCEAO instruction imposes travel-rule obligations on PSAV.

80%

'Directive n° 02/2021/CM/UEMOA du 29 mars 2021' does not exist. The regional AML/CFT directive was Directive n° 02/2015/CM/UEMOA, superseded by the Loi uniforme LBC/FT/FP du 31 mars 2023, which Côte d'Ivoire transposed by Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023. The uniform law does address virtual assets and PSAV (arts. 2(2), 2(51), 3(c), 58, 59), but it contains no travel-rule obligation for PSAV.

80%

'BCEAO Instruction n° 003/2022/RB du 17 novembre 2022' does not exist. BCEAO instructions are numbered nnn-mm-yyyy (e.g. 008-05-2015, 001-03-2021); the '/RB' form is never used, and the BCEAO instrument index contains no instrument of that number or of that date. No BCEAO instruction brings PSAV into the scope of supervised entities: PSAV are made assujettis by art. 3(c) of the Loi uniforme du 31 mars 2023, transposed in Côte d'Ivoire by Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023, and art. 59 leaves PSAV-specific requirements to a competent authority that has not been designated.

80%

'Loi n° 2016-1110 du 8 décembre 2016' does not exist. Côte d'Ivoire's prior AML/CFT statute was Loi n° 2016-992 du 14 novembre 2016 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme; it has been replaced by Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023, which transposes the UMOA Loi uniforme du 31 mars 2023 and is the operative framework. It is also wrong that 'the specifics for VASPs are mostly derived from the BCEAO texts': there are no BCEAO texts on PSAV. The ordonnance makes PSAV assujettis (art. 3(c)) and requires prior agrément (art. 58), while art. 59 defers PSAV-specific requirements to a competent authority that has never been designated — so no VASP-specific rules, and no travel rule, are operative.

80%

No 'BCEAO Instruction n° 003/2022/RB' exists. BCEAO instructions are numbered nnn-mm-yyyy (e.g. 008-05-2015, 001-01-2024); the '/RB' suffix is not a BCEAO numbering convention. CENTIF-CI's complete dated register of Ivorian LBC/FT instruments lists no such instruction and no travel-rule instrument of any kind. The operative Ivorian text is Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023 (transposing the UMOA uniform law of 31 March 2023), whose originator/beneficiary rules (arts. 39-47) are drafted for institutions financieres — defined separately from PSAV at art. 2 — so no crypto travel rule obligation exists for PSAV in Cote d'Ivoire and none took effect in November 2022.

80%

There is no EUR 1,000 virtual-asset travel-rule threshold in force in Cote d'Ivoire. Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023 places the originator/beneficiary information duties in arts. 39-47 on institutions financieres only; art. 2 defines PSAV as a distinct category, and art. 59 defers all PSAV-specific requirements to a competent authority that Cote d'Ivoire has not designated. The threshold figure is also denominated in the wrong currency — UEMOA thresholds are set in FCFA (see Decision n° 021 du 21/12/2023/CM/UMOA on seuils). The EUR 1,000 figure is FATF Recommendation 16 boilerplate, not Ivorian law.

80%

The retention period in Cote d'Ivoire is ten years, not five. Ordonnance n° 2023-875 du 23 novembre 2023, art. 23, requires 'conservation pendant une duree de dix ans, a compter de la cloture de leurs comptes ou de la cessation de leurs relations', tracking art. 23 of the UMOA uniform law of 31 March 2023. The five-year figure is the FATF Recommendation 11 minimum, imported instead of the local text.

80%

Administrative sanctions in Cote d'Ivoire are not imposed by CENTIF-CI. CENTIF-CI is the financial intelligence unit and receives declarations de soupcon (Ordonnance n° 2023-875, art. 60); it has no sanctioning power. Administrative and disciplinary sanctions are imposed by the autorite de controle — for banks, compagnies financieres, SFD and etablissements de monnaie electronique this is the Commission Bancaire de l'UMOA, acting through its College de supervision ('sanctions disciplinaires et pecuniaires prononcees par le College de Supervision de la Commission Bancaire de l'UMOA') — and, for other assujettis, by the Commission Nationale des Sanctions LBC/FT established by Ordonnance n° 2022-237 du 30 mars 2022 and Decret n° 2024-58 du 14 fevrier 2024. The BCEAO itself is the central bank, not the sanctioning organ. Critically, no autorite de controle has been designated for PSAV, so none of these ladders is applicable to virtual-asset service providers in practice.

16 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by SearXNG+LLM .

Primary Sources

https://ofac.treasury.gov/. (n.d.). ofac.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from https://ofac.treasury.gov/

https://ofac.treasury.gov/sdn-list-data. (n.d.). ofac.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from https://ofac.treasury.gov/sdn-list-data

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/2529/download. (n.d.). ofac.treasury.gov. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/2529/download

Secondary Sources

https://giaba.org/. (n.d.). giaba.org. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from https://giaba.org/

https://www.finances.gouv.ci/. (n.d.). finances.gouv.ci. Retrieved April 21, 2026, from https://www.finances.gouv.ci/

Edit History

2026-04-26 — fix-grade-d-pipeline: upgraded — Auto-upgraded from D to A using allFacts sources

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →