Grade B AI-Researched

Botswana -- Custody Regulations Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-08-17 Updated: 2026-04-22 Author: SearXNG+LLM Version 1 Sources cited in: English (1)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

Botswana has made significant strides in regulating virtual assets with the promulgation of the Virtual Assets Act, 2022. This Act provides the foundational legal framework, placing the regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), including those offering custody services, under the purview of the Non-Bank Financial Institutions Regulatory Authority (NBFIRA).

It's important to note that while the Act provides the broad framework, detailed, granular regulations covering every specific aspect of custody (like explicit cold storage mandates or detailed qualified custodian definitions) are often developed through secondary legislation, directives, or guidelines issued by the regulatory authority. As of early 2024, NBFIRA is actively working on implementing the Act.

Here's a breakdown based on the Virtual Assets Act, 2022 and general regulatory principles:


Botswana Cryptocurrency/Digital Asset Custody Regulations

Primary Legislation:

  • Virtual Assets Act, 2022 (Act No. 19 of 2022, published in the Botswana Government Gazette on 27th May 2022)

Regulatory Authority:

  • Non-Bank Financial Institutions Regulatory Authority (NBFIRA)

1. Custodial License Requirements

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022 mandates licensing for all Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) operating in Botswana. "Custody or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets" is explicitly defined as a VASP activity requiring a license.

Key Provisions (Virtual Assets Act, 2022):

  • Section 5: Prohibits any person from carrying on a virtual asset business or virtual assets service without a license issued by NBFIRA.
  • Section 3 (Definitions): Defines a "virtual asset service provider" (VASP) to include any person who, as a business, "provides custody or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets."
  • Sections 6-10: Outline the application process for a license, including requirements such as:
    • Application in the prescribed form.
    • Payment of prescribed fees.
    • Provision of information on the applicant's business, management, financial resources, operational plan, internal controls, risk management systems, and compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) obligations.
    • NBFIRA assesses the applicant's "fit and proper" status, ensuring the applicant and its management have the necessary integrity, competence, and financial soundness.

Specific Regulatory Reference:

  • Virtual Assets Act, 2022, Part III (Sections 5-13): Licensing of Virtual Assets Service Providers.
  • URL: While a direct public URL for the full Act from the Botswana government might require navigating their gazette archives, the Act was published in the Botswana Government Gazette Vol. LX, No. 34, G. 4032 on 27th May 2022. You can often find copies through legal information services or by direct request to NBFIRA.

2. Segregation of Client Assets Rules

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022 lays the groundwork for sound operational practices, which implicitly include the need for proper client asset management. While the Act itself might not contain highly granular rules for asset segregation, it provides NBFIRA with the power to issue such directives.

Key Provisions (Virtual Assets Act, 2022):

  • Section 15: Requires a licensed VASP to "at all times maintain adequate and appropriate systems of control and procedures for the proper administration of its affairs." This provision is broad enough to encompass requirements for client asset segregation to prevent co-mingling and protect client funds in case of VASP insolvency.
  • Section 18: Grants NBFIRA the power to issue directives and practice notes to VASPs concerning various matters, which would include detailed operational requirements like asset segregation.

It is highly probable that NBFIRA, through subsequent regulations or directives, will mandate clear segregation of client virtual assets from the VASP's proprietary assets. This is a fundamental principle in traditional financial custody and AML/CFT best practices (e.g., FATF Recommendation 15).

3. Insurance/Bonding Requirements

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022, does not explicitly mandate specific insurance or bonding requirements for VASPs.

Key Provisions (Virtual Assets Act, 2022):

  • Section 15(1)(d): Requires a VASP to "at all times maintain adequate financial resources for the proper performance of its functions." While not directly mandating insurance, adequate financial resources could implicitly cover potential liabilities.
  • Section 18: NBFIRA has the power to issue directives. It could, in the future, introduce requirements for professional indemnity insurance or specific bonding for VASPs handling client assets, especially given the risks associated with virtual assets.

As with segregation, detailed insurance requirements are often developed in subsequent regulatory instruments rather than the primary legislative act.

4. Cold Storage Mandates

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022 does not contain explicit mandates for the use of cold storage (offline storage of private keys) for virtual assets.

Key Provisions (Virtual Assets Act, 2022):

  • Section 15(1)(a): Requires a licensed VASP to "implement appropriate measures to safeguard the virtual assets under its custody or control against theft, loss, or damage."
  • Section 15(1)(b): Requires a VASP to "implement a robust information technology framework to manage risks, including cybersecurity and operational resilience."

While these provisions don't specifically name "cold storage," they clearly empower NBFIRA to require VASPs to adopt secure storage practices. Given the security benefits, NBFIRA is likely to recommend or mandate specific security measures, which could include the use of cold storage for a significant portion of client assets, through subsequent directives or guidelines. This aligns with global best practices for secure virtual asset custody.

5. Qualified Custodian Definitions

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022 defines "Virtual Asset Service Provider" and specifically includes entities providing "custody or administration of virtual assets." The Act does not create a separate category or definition for a "qualified custodian" distinct from a licensed VASP performing custody services.

Key Provisions (Virtual Assets Act, 2022):

  • Section 3 (Definitions): A "virtual asset service provider" is any person who, as a business, performs one or more of several enumerated activities, including "custody or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets."

Therefore, under Botswana law, any entity licensed by NBFIRA to provide custody services for virtual assets would effectively function as a "qualified custodian" within the regulatory framework, meeting the requirements set out by the Act and subsequent NBFIRA directives. The "qualification" comes from meeting the licensing and operational standards set by NBFIRA.

6. Any Pending Custody Legislation

The Virtual Assets Act, 2022 is the primary, relatively new legislation. While there isn't typically another Act pending specifically for custody, the implementation and detailed elaboration of the existing Act are ongoing.

Key Pending Regulatory Activity:

  • NBFIRA Directives, Regulations, and Guidelines: NBFIRA is mandated by the Act to develop and issue subsidiary legislation, directives, and guidelines to fully implement its provisions. These future instruments are expected to provide the granular detail for aspects like:
    • Specific requirements for risk management in custody (including cybersecurity, disaster recovery).
    • Detailed operational requirements (e.g., specific security measures for private keys, possibly including cold storage ratios).
    • Further clarification on client asset protection and segregation.
    • Specific capital adequacy or insurance requirements.
  • Public Consultations: NBFIRA is likely to engage in public consultations as it develops these detailed regulations, allowing industry stakeholders to provide input.

Therefore, while no new Acts are currently pending specifically for custody, the "pending" aspect lies in the development of the secondary legislation and regulatory instruments by NBFIRA, which will flesh out the specific requirements for virtual asset custody in Botswana.


In summary: Botswana has established a clear legal framework with the Virtual Assets Act, 2022, requiring all virtual asset custodians to be licensed by NBFIRA. The Act sets the stage for NBFIRA to implement comprehensive rules for safeguarding client assets, robust cybersecurity, and sound operational practices, through further detailed regulations and directives. Interested parties should monitor NBFIRA's official publications for these upcoming specific requirements.

Source Data

80%

Botswana's operative virtual-asset statute is the Virtual Assets Act, 2025 (Act No. 4 of 2025), which commenced on 24 January 2025 by Statutory Instrument No. 9 of 2025 and whose section 40 repeals the Virtual Assets Act, 2022 (Act No. 3 of 2022); the repealed 2022 Act was assented to and commenced on 25 February 2022 and was never numbered Act No. 19 of 2022, nor gazetted on 27 May 2022.

80%

Non-Bank Financial Institutions Regulatory Authority (NBFIRA)

80%

The prohibition on carrying on virtual asset business without a licence is section 9 of Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2025 (Act No. 4 of 2025), re-enacting section 9 of the repealed 2022 Act, and it requires a virtual asset service provider licence or an issuer of initial token offerings licence; section 5 of both Acts is instead the Regulatory Authority's power to request information.

80%

Botswana's Virtual Assets Act places its interpretation provisions in section 2, not section 3, section 3 being the application provision; the repealed Virtual Assets Act, 2022 defined a virtual asset service provider as a person who under an agreement, as part of a business, undertakes a virtual asset service on behalf of another person, or who is a dealer or is willing to deal on own account by buying and selling virtual assets at prices set by that person, and the Virtual Assets Act, 2025 re-enacted that definition to cure the drafting deficiency ESAAMLG identified against the FATF standard.

80%

Sections 6-10: Outline the application process for a license, including requirements such as:

80%

Application in the prescribed form.

80%

Provision of information on the applicant's business, management, financial resources, operational plan, internal controls, risk management systems, and compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) obligations.

80%

Section 11 of Botswana's Virtual Assets Act requires the Regulatory Authority to be satisfied that a licence applicant is a fit and proper person, and that a natural person applicant is resident in Botswana, before issuing a virtual asset service provider or issuer of initial token offerings licence, and the fit-and-proper test also grounds revocation of a licence already granted.

80%

Part III of Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 was headed Licensing of Virtual Asset Businesses and ran from section 8 to section 19, not from section 5 to section 13; under the Virtual Assets Act, 2025 the equivalent Part III runs from section 8 to section 21, sections 5 to 7 sitting in Part II on the functions and powers of the Regulatory Authority.

80%

Section 15 of Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 dealt with suspension or revocation of a licence without notice and imposed no systems-of-control duty; the client-asset provision was section 20, re-enacted as section 23 of the Virtual Assets Act, 2025, which requires a licence holder holding customer virtual assets to maintain in its custody a sufficient amount of each type of virtual asset to meet its obligations to the customer and to meet all prescribed financial requirements, and provides that those assets are held for the customer, are not the property of the licence holder and are not subject to the claims of the licence holder's creditors.

80%

Section 18 of Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 concerned information on the assignment and transfer of a licence or beneficial ownership and conferred no directive or practice-note power; NBFIRA's instrument-making authority comes from section 4, which lets the Regulatory Authority develop rules, guidance and codes of practice and publish notices, guidelines, bulletins and policies, while the power to make regulations vests in the Minister under section 36 of the 2022 Act and section 43 of the Virtual Assets Act, 2025, which also adds a separate rules power at section 42.

80%

Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 had no section 15(1)(d) and imposed no adequate-financial-resources duty in section 15, whose subsection (1) ran only to paragraph (c) and dealt with suspension or revocation without notice; the financial obligation on a custodian was section 20(1)(b), requiring a licence holder to meet all financial requirements as may be prescribed, and the Virtual Assets Act, 2025 adds a dedicated minimum capital requirements provision at section 27. The word insurance appears nowhere in the 2022 Act.

80%

Section 18: NBFIRA has the power to issue directives. It could, in the future, introduce requirements for professional indemnity insurance or specific bonding for VASPs handling client assets, especially given the risks associated with virtual assets.

80%

Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 has no section 15(1)(a) safeguarding duty and the quoted wording about theft, loss or damage appears nowhere in it; the safeguarding obligations are section 20, requiring a licence holder with custody of customer virtual assets to maintain a sufficient amount of each type of virtual asset to meet its obligations to the customer, and section 26, requiring a licence holder to ensure that appropriate measures are put into place for the protection of customers' virtual assets. Those provisions become sections 23 and 32 in the Virtual Assets Act, 2025.

80%

Botswana's Virtual Assets Act, 2022 contains no information-technology or cybersecurity provision and the words cyber and information technology appear nowhere in its text, section 15 being the provision on suspension or revocation of a licence without notice; the quoted robust information technology framework, cybersecurity and operational resilience wording matches Namibia's Cyber Security Rules made under the Virtual Assets Act, 2023 and published in Government Gazette 8200, Government Notice 516 of 1 September 2023.

80%

Section 3 (Definitions): A "virtual asset service provider" is any person who, as a business, performs one or more of several enumerated activities, including "custody or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets."

80%

NBFIRA Directives, Regulations, and Guidelines: NBFIRA is mandated by the Act to develop and issue subsidiary legislation, directives, and guidelines to fully implement its provisions. These future instruments are expected to provide the granular detail for aspects like:

80%

Botswana's Cybersecurity Bill, 2025 was a bill and imposed nothing; it was enacted as the Cybersecurity Act, 2025 (Act No. 21 of 2025), whose commencement is by ministerial notice, and it creates no virtual-asset custody, client-asset or disaster-recovery obligation on virtual asset service providers, whose custody duties come from section 23 of the Virtual Assets Act, 2025 and whose only Botswana-specific technology guidance is NBFIRA's AML/CFT Guidance Note of 10 March 2025.

80%

Detailed operational requirements (e.g., specific security measures for private keys, possibly including cold storage ratios).

80%

Further clarification on client asset protection and segregation.

80%

Specific capital adequacy or insurance requirements.

80%

Public Consultations: NBFIRA is likely to engage in public consultations as it develops these detailed regulations, allowing industry stakeholders to provide input.

3 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

References

This article was generated by SearXNG+LLM .

Primary Sources

nbfira.org.bw. (n.d.). NBFIRA Website. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://www.nbfira.org.bw/

Edit History

2026-04-22 — auto-publish-pipeline: reviewed — Auto-promoted to review: grade C
2026-08-17 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade B

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →